Guilty of what? Using legal supplements?Raiderdave wrote:& after hes found to be guiltyXman wrote:And unlike the NRL the AFL will actually wait for Hird to defend himself rather than believing a guy like Dank
unlike the NRL
the VFL will wheel this out of its punishment drawer ... a wet one of these for a darn good thrashing
VFL .. soft on drugs
when this karmicahel is found guilty & he willXman wrote:Guilty of what? Using legal supplements?Raiderdave wrote:& after hes found to be guiltyXman wrote:And unlike the NRL the AFL will actually wait for Hird to defend himself rather than believing a guy like Dank
unlike the NRL
the VFL will wheel this out of its punishment drawer ... a wet one of these for a darn good thrashing
VFL .. soft on drugs
Oh dear, what a naughty boy!
For taking a legal supplement? They better start rounding up every NRL player in the game then.Raiderdave wrote:piesman2011 wrote:So Neil Mitchell could argue that James Hird has broken an AFL code of ethics. Hird right now would be quaking in his boots about that fine he might get from the AFL for that one.Rabbit wrote:http://www.3aw.com.au/Neil_Mitchell_Blog
And today I have been through the AFL drug code. There is a very strong argument that is does cover James Hird, and in fact any official of a club.On this, the AFL drug code is unequivocal in that it applies to officials. Page eight says it applies to officials. Page five describes what an official is: “An official means coach, trainer, manager etc.”
a fine ?
if he were in the NRL he'd be run out of the game for life ....
this being the difference between these organisations
one is full of integrity & a sense of what is acceptable behaviour & what needs to be eradicated
the other
is the VFL
What's he guilty of? He's not bound by the WADA restrictions. He is no longer a pro athlete. It's not an illegal drug. You can buy it just about anywhere.Raiderdave wrote:when this karmicahel is found guilty & he willXman wrote:Guilty of what? Using legal supplements?Raiderdave wrote:& after hes found to be guilty
unlike the NRL
the VFL will wheel this out of its punishment drawer ... a wet one of these for a darn good thrashing
VFL .. soft on drugs
Oh dear, what a naughty boy!
the crap I will inflict on you will be epic , you delusional twat
piesman2011 wrote:For taking a legal supplement? They better start rounding up every NRL player in the game then.Raiderdave wrote:piesman2011 wrote:So Neil Mitchell could argue that James Hird has broken an AFL code of ethics. Hird right now would be quaking in his boots about that fine he might get from the AFL for that one.
a fine ?
if he were in the NRL he'd be run out of the game for life ....
this being the difference between these organisations
one is full of integrity & a sense of what is acceptable behaviour & what needs to be eradicated
the other
is the VFL
http://bestbuysupplements.com.au/muscle ... p1255.htmlRaiderdave wrote:piesman2011 wrote:For taking a legal supplement? They better start rounding up every NRL player in the game then.Raiderdave wrote:
a fine ?
if he were in the NRL he'd be run out of the game for life ....
this being the difference between these organisations
one is full of integrity & a sense of what is acceptable behaviour & what needs to be eradicated
the other
is the VFL
marcus says its legal
you say its legal
hes a dumb khunt
you're dumber
with you 2 saying he has nothing to worry about
he should be calling a priest to administer the last rights
Add that to the dodgy behaviour of shutting out club doctors, and Danks and other Essendon club personnels expressed concerns and we have a 98%chance ol Hirdy boy is a crook of the highest order, desperate to 'win at all costs'.
[-o< [-o< 
xman wrote:KE, why is an even comp important?
King-Eliagh wrote:Today's news suggests Hirdy boy was taking supplements which are illegal for use amongst players.
Whatta Coach!
Xman I can picture you now kneeling against your bed before going to sleep last night...
[-o<
Dear God...and Andrew Demitriou, please, please help our coach James Hird get through this. I dont care if he's done wrong, its important for the AFL and the sport for ol golden boy James Hird to be innocent, even if he's as guilty as can be. I've ignorantly taught my kids he's a pillar of society and I've already said I dont care what Hirdy has done in regards to his personal drug use to the folks down at Talking Footy. I'm in a really tough spot here God and Andrew [-o< please, please make all this go away
Xman's wife who'd just come out of the shower and overheard him while standing in the doorway:
News flash. Coach takes supplements illegal for players......King-Eliagh wrote:Today's news suggests Hirdy boy was taking supplements which are illegal for use amongst players.
Whatta Coach!
Xman I can picture you now kneeling against your bed before going to sleep last night...
[-o<
Dear God...and Andrew Demitriou, please, please help our coach James Hird get through this. I dont care if he's done wrong, its important for the AFL and the sport for ol golden boy James Hird to be innocent, even if he's as guilty as can be. I've ignorantly taught my kids he's a pillar of society and I've already said I dont care what Hirdy has done in regards to his personal drug use to the folks down at Talking Footy. I'm in a really tough spot here God and Andrew [-o< please, please make all this go away
Xman's wife who'd just come out of the shower and overheard him while standing in the doorway:
xman wrote:KE, why is an even comp important?
Not quite. Rabbit found an article in which the author claimed (lets make sure i use his words) he could "argue a case " that coaches fall under the same rules as players according to AFL rules (not a WADA rule) Since then we have heard crickets on that, with every other journalist saying that he didnt fall under the WADA rules.King-Eliagh wrote:Rabbit found that the coach is under the same regs as the players.
And the coach shut out the club doctor.
And club staff have insinuated he's a dodgy dodgy fella.
Add it all up and keep on prayin Xman
Richard Ings from ASADA claimed Hird had NOT breached WADA or AFL policy, even if he had taken the substances Dank claimed. Of course Hird is denying this anyway, and deserves to have his say. But Coaches are allowed to take substances that are banned for players. That makes perfect sense given many common and important medications are in that categorie, like sudafed, ventolin, amongst others. What coaches are not allowed to do is supply banned substances to players or encourage them to take banned substances.King-Eliagh wrote:Rabbit found that the coach is under the same regs as the players.
And the coach shut out the club doctor.
And club staff have insinuated he's a dodgy dodgy fella.
Add it all up and keep on prayin Xman
Xman wrote:Richard Ings from ASADA claimed Hird had NOT breached WADA or AFL policy, even if he had taken the substances Dank claimed. Of course Hird is denying this anyway, and deserves to have his say. But Coaches are allowed to take substances that are banned for players. That makes perfect sense given many common and important medications are in that categorie, like sudafed, ventolin, amongst others. What coaches are not allowed to do is supply banned substances to players or encourage them to take banned substances.King-Eliagh wrote:Rabbit found that the coach is under the same regs as the players.
And the coach shut out the club doctor.
And club staff have insinuated he's a dodgy dodgy fella.
Add it all up and keep on prayin Xman
Get your facts right dumbarse
I'll take my advice from presently serving ASADA officials , for unlike Hirdy's ol mate Richard Ing .. I hear he's an Essenminda fan tooXman wrote:Except he knows a shit lot more than you
