
duuuuuuuuurrrrrrrrrhhhhhhhhhhhh
its simple maths peeps
how could it not equal a larger total
if in the event of this not being the case
theres only one world to describe such a scenario
DECLINE .....

oh so now its excuse #489Xman wrote:It doesnt automtically mean more crowds. If the NRL added another team in NZ and another in Melbourne this would devide the existing RL fans in these areas between the existing club and the new clubs. Just like some fans have gone from the swans to the giants, and from the lions to the suns.
The net result would not be more crowds, just one more game and 2 smaller crowds. In fact if the number of rounds didnt increase it would also mean less local derby games and less games in heartland states which could even drop the total audience.
However, if the total audience goes up like the AFL have seen this year, this is more fans in total, new fans that hadnt attended the games in previoua years. GROWTH! =D>
its one of numerous reasons. Of course some AFL supporters have changed from the swans to the giants, like people who live in western Sydney. Or are you suggesting their 7000 new members from WS are all new AFL fans? :DRaiderdave wrote:oh so now its excuse #489Xman wrote:It doesnt automtically mean more crowds. If the NRL added another team in NZ and another in Melbourne this would devide the existing RL fans in these areas between the existing club and the new clubs. Just like some fans have gone from the swans to the giants, and from the lions to the suns.
The net result would not be more crowds, just one more game and 2 smaller crowds. In fact if the number of rounds didnt increase it would also mean less local derby games and less games in heartland states which could even drop the total audience.
However, if the total audience goes up like the AFL have seen this year, this is more fans in total, new fans that hadnt attended the games in previoua years. GROWTH! =D>
yes because its quite feasible that the premiership winning swines have LOST support to the wooden spoon winning midgets![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
hes actually serious folks![]()
![]()
![]()
one of numerous invalid laughable excusesXman wrote:its one of numerous reasons. :DRaiderdave wrote:oh so now its excuse #489Xman wrote:It doesnt automtically mean more crowds. If the NRL added another team in NZ and another in Melbourne this would devide the existing RL fans in these areas between the existing club and the new clubs. Just like some fans have gone from the swans to the giants, and from the lions to the suns.
The net result would not be more crowds, just one more game and 2 smaller crowds. In fact if the number of rounds didnt increase it would also mean less local derby games and less games in heartland states which could even drop the total audience.
However, if the total audience goes up like the AFL have seen this year, this is more fans in total, new fans that hadnt attended the games in previoua years. GROWTH! =D>
yes because its quite feasible that the premiership winning swines have LOST support to the wooden spoon winning midgets![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
hes actually serious folks![]()
![]()
![]()
Cool, so the Suns and Giants members are all new fans of the AFL. =D>Raiderdave wrote:one of numerous invalid laughable excusesXman wrote:its one of numerous reasons. :DRaiderdave wrote:oh so now its excuse #489
yes because its quite feasible that the premiership winning swines have LOST support to the wooden spoon winning midgets![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
hes actually serious folks![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Here I will respond for Dave. This is what he would say:Xman wrote:Cool, so the Suns and Giants members are all new fans of the AFL. =D>Raiderdave wrote:one of numerous invalid laughable excusesXman wrote:its one of numerous reasons. :D![]()
![]()
![]()
piesman2011 wrote:Here I will respond for Dave. .Xman wrote:Cool, so the Suns and Giants members are all new fans of the AFL. =D>Raiderdave wrote:one of numerous invalid laughable excuses![]()
![]()
![]()
Damn I forgot theRaiderdave wrote:piesman2011 wrote:Here I will respond for Dave. .Xman wrote:Cool, so the Suns and Giants members are all new fans of the AFL. =D>
you have trouble responding legibly for yourself let alone anyone else dickhead![]()
![]()
piesman2011 wrote:Damn I forgot theRaiderdave wrote:piesman2011 wrote:Here I will respond for Dave. .
you have trouble responding legibly for yourself let alone anyone else dickhead![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
It must have been a good impersonation then.Raiderdave wrote:piesman2011 wrote:Damn I forgot theRaiderdave wrote:
you have trouble responding legibly for yourself let alone anyone else dickhead![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
you also forgot to make any sense
Touché.Xman wrote:Well that wouldn't be an impersonation of you then...
Users browsing this forum: Ahrefs [Bot], Bing [Bot] and 8 guests