I could easily have Fox and FTA on in my house at the same time with that argument....Xman wrote:Theyre simulcast you moron!
One takes viewers from the other! Of course you add them together for the total audience. You can't watch both at once.
As pies said, both AFL games shown nationally have achieved audiences over 1.15m, and thats despite Perth ratings dropping by half. =D>
Ahhh what?eelofwest wrote:I could easily have Fox and FTA on in my house at the same time with that argument....Xman wrote:Theyre simulcast you moron!
One takes viewers from the other! Of course you add them together for the total audience. You can't watch both at once.
As pies said, both AFL games shown nationally have achieved audiences over 1.15m, and thats despite Perth ratings dropping by half. =D>
Sorry Xman the facts do not lie, NRL Number 1 on FTA and FOXTEL........need to take that silver and be a good sport.............
I would like to see you try and prove that the AFL rates higher on FTA or FOX....................................................whats that you cant........................thought so.........Xman wrote:Ahhh what?eelofwest wrote:I could easily have Fox and FTA on in my house at the same time with that argument....Xman wrote:Theyre simulcast you moron!
One takes viewers from the other! Of course you add them together for the total audience. You can't watch both at once.
As pies said, both AFL games shown nationally have achieved audiences over 1.15m, and thats despite Perth ratings dropping by half. =D>
Sorry Xman the facts do not lie, NRL Number 1 on FTA and FOXTEL........need to take that silver and be a good sport.............
The ratings are one or the other, not how many channels are you watching at the same time!
Foxtel ratings are taken in 1 minute sections. If youre watching FTA youre not watching foxtel so youre not counted in the foxtel ratings.
Any other excuses because that ones a shocker!
Its like me saying the AFL win by only counting metro, which they do of course. You rightly claim that only includes 2/3rds of your audience. Well given the AFL is shown on both FTA and Fox simultaneously then FTA is only 75% of our total figure.eelofwest wrote:I would like to see you try and prove that the AFL rates higher on FTA or FOX....................................................whats that you cant........................thought so.........Xman wrote:Ahhh what?eelofwest wrote:I could easily have Fox and FTA on in my house at the same time with that argument....
Sorry Xman the facts do not lie, NRL Number 1 on FTA and FOXTEL........need to take that silver and be a good sport.............
The ratings are one or the other, not how many channels are you watching at the same time!
Foxtel ratings are taken in 1 minute sections. If youre watching FTA youre not watching foxtel so youre not counted in the foxtel ratings.
Any other excuses because that ones a shocker!
well of course we are eelseelofwest wrote:I could easily have Fox and FTA on in my house at the same time with that argument....Xman wrote:Theyre simulcast you moron!
One takes viewers from the other! Of course you add them together for the total audience. You can't watch both at once.
As pies said, both AFL games shown nationally have achieved audiences over 1.15m, and thats despite Perth ratings dropping by half. =D>
Sorry Xman the facts do not lie, NRL Number 1 on FTA and FOXTEL........need to take that silver and be a good sport.............
2 points eelseelofwest wrote:Pies no AFL game yet has got past 1m on FTA this year.....piesman2011 wrote:Been two AFL games already that have gone past 1.1 million out of 3 games. Do you ever get sick of being wrong.Raiderdave wrote:pretty good number in Perth too considering the 4.30 kickoff
but yes
a minimum 1.1 Million
bigger then any Vicky Kicky game for this round ... WITH foxtel added
silver
its now a way of life for them
Now when you add the simulcasting then yes but FTA alone and you boys are way of the NRL benchmark on FTA and FOX.
Yes but a ratings box will only read 1 at a time.eelofwest wrote:I could easily have Fox and FTA on in my house at the same time with that argument....Xman wrote:Theyre simulcast you moron!
One takes viewers from the other! Of course you add them together for the total audience. You can't watch both at once.
As pies said, both AFL games shown nationally have achieved audiences over 1.15m, and thats despite Perth ratings dropping by half. =D>
Sorry Xman the facts do not lie, NRL Number 1 on FTA and FOXTEL........need to take that silver and be a good sport.............
What i am crazy for thinking that the NRL rates higher on FTA and FOX then the AFL, care to prove otherwise Pies????? Don't worry ill wait.......piesman2011 wrote:Yes but a ratings box will only read 1 at a time.eelofwest wrote:I could easily have Fox and FTA on in my house at the same time with that argument....Xman wrote:Theyre simulcast you moron!
One takes viewers from the other! Of course you add them together for the total audience. You can't watch both at once.
As pies said, both AFL games shown nationally have achieved audiences over 1.15m, and thats despite Perth ratings dropping by half. =D>
Sorry Xman the facts do not lie, NRL Number 1 on FTA and FOXTEL........need to take that silver and be a good sport.............
Look though the australian article again eels your sounding a bit crazy here.
Iv'e changed it but to 1116.piesman2011 wrote:Blues v richmond 682+ 252+ 226 = 1160
