but but butStewie wrote:Port didn't have 22 FTA games nationwide fuckstick. 22 into the local market, but not nation wide. If the nRL was smart and not all about maximising TV $, you too could have had 22 arse Raiders games into the local market, and may have actually posted a profit off your minuscule $10m budgetRaiderdave wrote:Stewie wrote:This. How are the Raiders supposed to grow their brand when they are only on FTA TV once a year? As the nRL is all about TV ratings and not the fans, this problem won't be going away anytime soon and the poor club will continue to make losses even with a minuscule budget.
we had 2 games on FTA in 2012 & posted a 3.4 Million dollar profit
Raiders rich with no exposure
powerfailure pennyless with plenty
Poort Powerfailure had .. 22... & posted a 6.3 Million dollar loss
gee
imagine if those the numb of games for the Raiders was 22
& it was 2 for Poort Poweroutage ?
Raiders rich with even with no exposure
poweroutage .. pennyless even with plenty of exposure