Fight Club - Football Club Memberships

Which is the best football code? Here you can have it out with other football fans.
Locked
User avatar
Raiderdave
Coach
Coach
Posts: 16700
Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2011 1:10 pm
Team: Canberra
Location:
Has thanked: 0
Been liked: 0

Re: AFL vs NRL (Memberships in 2013)

Post by Raiderdave »

Stewie wrote:
Raiderdave wrote:
Stewie wrote:
This. How are the Raiders supposed to grow their brand when they are only on FTA TV once a year? As the nRL is all about TV ratings and not the fans, this problem won't be going away anytime soon and the poor club will continue to make losses even with a minuscule budget.

we had 2 games on FTA in 2012 & posted a 3.4 Million dollar profit

Raiders rich with no exposure
powerfailure pennyless with plenty :wink:
Poort Powerfailure had .. 22... & posted a 6.3 Million dollar loss

gee :-k

imagine if those the numb of games for the Raiders was 22
& it was 2 for Poort Poweroutage ?

8-[


:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
Port didn't have 22 FTA games nationwide fuckstick. 22 into the local market, but not nation wide. If the nRL was smart and not all about maximising TV $, you too could have had 22 arse Raiders games into the local market, and may have actually posted a profit off your minuscule $10m budget :lol:
but but but :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

Raiders rich with even with no exposure
poweroutage .. pennyless even with plenty of exposure

:lol: :lol: :lol:
RL SOO II 4.194 Million veiwers
RL SOO I 4.068 Million
NRL GF 3.968 Million
VFL Grand Final 3.620 Million
SOO III 3.364 Million
NRL Prelim 2.219 Million
Kangaroos V NZ 1.214 Million

Sookerwhos V Japan 238K :lol:
User avatar
Xman
Coach
Coach
Posts: 13919
Joined: Wed Dec 28, 2011 7:09 pm
Team: Essendon
Location:
Has thanked: 0
Been liked: 0

Re: AFL vs NRL (Memberships in 2013)

Post by Xman »

Rich with the lowest budget of either code.....lol
King-Eliagh: ...I believe [RL] is popular in all the other states and territories, bar tasmania.
User avatar
Raiderdave
Coach
Coach
Posts: 16700
Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2011 1:10 pm
Team: Canberra
Location:
Has thanked: 0
Been liked: 0

Re: AFL vs NRL (Memberships in 2013)

Post by Raiderdave »

Stewie wrote:
Raiderdave wrote:
QueenslandISAFL wrote:
do you really want those crappy numbers displayed though :cool: :cool:
yeah .... sorta like do VFL clubs want their crappy financial results displayed :lol: :lol: :lol:
Imagine the profits that AFL clubs would be posting if they all had a tiny budget like the Raiders? To think the Raiders can't even make a fucking profit still... :lol: :lol: :lol:

61 Million my club turned over last year
double your tin pot club's :wink:

& we posted a profit ..... 4 times powerfailures


Poort can'tpaythe bills
struggling to survive



Raiders ..... posting multi million dollar profits & on easy street =D> =D> =D> =D>
RL SOO II 4.194 Million veiwers
RL SOO I 4.068 Million
NRL GF 3.968 Million
VFL Grand Final 3.620 Million
SOO III 3.364 Million
NRL Prelim 2.219 Million
Kangaroos V NZ 1.214 Million

Sookerwhos V Japan 238K :lol:
User avatar
Raiderdave
Coach
Coach
Posts: 16700
Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2011 1:10 pm
Team: Canberra
Location:
Has thanked: 0
Been liked: 0

Re: AFL vs NRL (Memberships in 2013)

Post by Raiderdave »

Xman wrote:
Rich with the lowest budget of either code.....lol

Rich ... with profits in the top 3 in either code cockhead :wink:
RL SOO II 4.194 Million veiwers
RL SOO I 4.068 Million
NRL GF 3.968 Million
VFL Grand Final 3.620 Million
SOO III 3.364 Million
NRL Prelim 2.219 Million
Kangaroos V NZ 1.214 Million

Sookerwhos V Japan 238K :lol:
User avatar
Xman
Coach
Coach
Posts: 13919
Joined: Wed Dec 28, 2011 7:09 pm
Team: Essendon
Location:
Has thanked: 0
Been liked: 0

Re: AFL vs NRL (Memberships in 2013)

Post by Xman »

Raiderdave wrote:
Xman wrote:
Rich with the lowest budget of either code.....lol

Rich ... with profits in the top 3 in either code cockhead :wink:
:lol: :lol: they aren't the sports clubs profits! Theyre the business arms. The club loses hundreds of thousands despite nearly 50% funding from grants! :lol:
King-Eliagh: ...I believe [RL] is popular in all the other states and territories, bar tasmania.
Stewie
Coach
Coach
Posts: 2771
Joined: Tue Oct 02, 2012 1:03 pm
Team: Port Adelaide Football Club
Location:
Has thanked: 0
Been liked: 0

Re: AFL vs NRL (Memberships in 2013)

Post by Stewie »

Raiderdave wrote:
Stewie wrote:
Raiderdave wrote:
yeah .... sorta like do VFL clubs want their crappy financial results displayed :lol: :lol: :lol:
Imagine the profits that AFL clubs would be posting if they all had a tiny budget like the Raiders? To think the Raiders can't even make a fucking profit still... :lol: :lol: :lol:

61 Million my club turned over last year
double your tin pot club's :wink:

& we posted a profit ..... 4 times powerfailures


Poort can'tpaythe bills
struggling to survive



Raiders ..... posting multi million dollar profits & on easy street =D> =D> =D> =D>
The football sector of the Raiders posted a $200k loss on a $10m budget. The football dept is obviously ignored by the Raiders, if their other businesses make so much money. Weird isn't it, a football club that doesn't care about the football club! They would prefer their pokies rooms to be fuller than their trophy cabinet (if they even have one).
Raiderdave wrote:

7K is a tremendous turnout
Image
User avatar
Raiderdave
Coach
Coach
Posts: 16700
Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2011 1:10 pm
Team: Canberra
Location:
Has thanked: 0
Been liked: 0

Re: AFL vs NRL (Memberships in 2013)

Post by Raiderdave »

Stewie wrote:
Raiderdave wrote:
Stewie wrote:
Imagine the profits that AFL clubs would be posting if they all had a tiny budget like the Raiders? To think the Raiders can't even make a fucking profit still... :lol: :lol: :lol:

61 Million my club turned over last year
double your tin pot club's :wink:

& we posted a profit ..... 4 times powerfailures


Poort can'tpaythe bills
struggling to survive



Raiders ..... posting multi million dollar profits & on easy street =D> =D> =D> =D>
The football sector of the Raiders posted a $200k loss on a $10m budget. The football dept is obviously ignored by the Raiders, if their other businesses make so much money. Weird isn't it, a football club that doesn't care about the football club! They would prefer their pokies rooms to be fuller than their trophy cabinet (if they even have one).
the Canberra Raiders RLFC PTY LTD posted a 3.4 Million dollar profit
they have more cash then they know what to do with ... does my club have :wink:
hence them entering the property development business to make tens of millions more


meanwhile poort pennyless
can barely afford loo paper in its office toilets :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

I somehow think poort wheresmedough will struggle to see out this current TV deal
RIP Poweroutage :cool:
RL SOO II 4.194 Million veiwers
RL SOO I 4.068 Million
NRL GF 3.968 Million
VFL Grand Final 3.620 Million
SOO III 3.364 Million
NRL Prelim 2.219 Million
Kangaroos V NZ 1.214 Million

Sookerwhos V Japan 238K :lol:
User avatar
Raiderdave
Coach
Coach
Posts: 16700
Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2011 1:10 pm
Team: Canberra
Location:
Has thanked: 0
Been liked: 0

Re: AFL vs NRL (Memberships in 2013)

Post by Raiderdave »

Xman wrote:
Raiderdave wrote:
Xman wrote:
Rich with the lowest budget of either code.....lol

Rich ... with profits in the top 3 in either code cockhead :wink:
:lol: :lol: they aren't the sports clubs profits! Theyre the business arms. The club loses hundreds of thousands despite nearly 50% funding from grants! :lol:

funny :-k
the name on the bank account is ..... The Canberra Raiders RLFC :wink:
RL SOO II 4.194 Million veiwers
RL SOO I 4.068 Million
NRL GF 3.968 Million
VFL Grand Final 3.620 Million
SOO III 3.364 Million
NRL Prelim 2.219 Million
Kangaroos V NZ 1.214 Million

Sookerwhos V Japan 238K :lol:
Stewie
Coach
Coach
Posts: 2771
Joined: Tue Oct 02, 2012 1:03 pm
Team: Port Adelaide Football Club
Location:
Has thanked: 0
Been liked: 0

Re: AFL vs NRL (Memberships in 2013)

Post by Stewie »

Raiderdave wrote:
Stewie wrote:
Raiderdave wrote:

61 Million my club turned over last year
double your tin pot club's :wink:

& we posted a profit ..... 4 times powerfailures


Poort can'tpaythe bills
struggling to survive



Raiders ..... posting multi million dollar profits & on easy street =D> =D> =D> =D>
The football sector of the Raiders posted a $200k loss on a $10m budget. The football dept is obviously ignored by the Raiders, if their other businesses make so much money. Weird isn't it, a football club that doesn't care about the football club! They would prefer their pokies rooms to be fuller than their trophy cabinet (if they even have one).
the Canberra Raiders RLFC PTY LTD posted a 3.4 Million dollar profit
they have more cash then they know what to do with ... does my club have :wink:
hence them entering the property development business to make tens of millions more


meanwhile poort pennyless
can barely afford loo paper in its office toilets :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

I somehow think poort wheresmedough will struggle to see out this current TV deal
RIP Poweroutage :cool:
Why does the football dept have such a small budget? Why don't they care about them? Is it because they know the actual football team isn't worth the investment? I guess no one would want to pour money into a club that makes a $200k loss on a $10m tiny budget. :lol:
Raiderdave wrote:

7K is a tremendous turnout
Image
User avatar
Raiderdave
Coach
Coach
Posts: 16700
Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2011 1:10 pm
Team: Canberra
Location:
Has thanked: 0
Been liked: 0

Re: AFL vs NRL (Memberships in 2013)

Post by Raiderdave »

Stewie wrote:
Raiderdave wrote:
Stewie wrote:
The football sector of the Raiders posted a $200k loss on a $10m budget. The football dept is obviously ignored by the Raiders, if their other businesses make so much money. Weird isn't it, a football club that doesn't care about the football club! They would prefer their pokies rooms to be fuller than their trophy cabinet (if they even have one).
the Canberra Raiders RLFC PTY LTD posted a 3.4 Million dollar profit
they have more cash then they know what to do with ... does my club have :wink:
hence them entering the property development business to make tens of millions more


meanwhile poort pennyless
can barely afford loo paper in its office toilets :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

I somehow think poort wheresmedough will struggle to see out this current TV deal
RIP Poweroutage :cool:
Why does the football dept have such a small budget? Why don't they care about them? Is it because they know the actual football team isn't worth the investment? I guess no one would want to pour money into a club that makes a $200k loss on a $10m tiny budget. :lol:

the Raiders have made the finals 8 times in the last 15 years
their football dept gets results , making the Football budget irrelevant because the company's overall bottom line is so very healthy .... if ever there was a decline in football revenue it can be easily covered ... no sponsor
no problem
no TV exposure
no problem

many other clubs in both codes cannot claim the same security
all their eggs in the one basket
like poor ol poort shitzhispants ..... their football dept is a dogs breakfast
spends too much
earns too little

no back ups


& this equals


gooonnnneeeeeeeeeeeeee.................................... :cool:
RL SOO II 4.194 Million veiwers
RL SOO I 4.068 Million
NRL GF 3.968 Million
VFL Grand Final 3.620 Million
SOO III 3.364 Million
NRL Prelim 2.219 Million
Kangaroos V NZ 1.214 Million

Sookerwhos V Japan 238K :lol:
Stewie
Coach
Coach
Posts: 2771
Joined: Tue Oct 02, 2012 1:03 pm
Team: Port Adelaide Football Club
Location:
Has thanked: 0
Been liked: 0

Re: AFL vs NRL (Memberships in 2013)

Post by Stewie »

Raiderdave wrote:
Stewie wrote:
Raiderdave wrote:
the Canberra Raiders RLFC PTY LTD posted a 3.4 Million dollar profit
they have more cash then they know what to do with ... does my club have :wink:
hence them entering the property development business to make tens of millions more


meanwhile poort pennyless
can barely afford loo paper in its office toilets :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

I somehow think poort wheresmedough will struggle to see out this current TV deal
RIP Poweroutage :cool:
Why does the football dept have such a small budget? Why don't they care about them? Is it because they know the actual football team isn't worth the investment? I guess no one would want to pour money into a club that makes a $200k loss on a $10m tiny budget. :lol:

the Raiders have made the finals 8 times in the last 15 years
their football dept gets results , making the Football budget irrelevant because the company's overall bottom line is so very healthy .... if ever there was a decline in football revenue it can be easily covered ... no sponsor
no problem
no TV exposure
no problem

many other clubs in both codes cannot claim the same security
all their eggs in the one basket
like poor ol poort shitzhispants ..... their football dept is a dogs breakfast
spends too much
earns too little

no back ups


& this equals


gooonnnneeeeeeeeeeeeee.................................... :cool:
Wow, the administration doesn't give a crap about the football dept. If they poured a few million more into it, maybe they would get some real success. But they have other interests instead. A football club that doesn't even put the football club first... only in the nRL. :lol:
Raiderdave wrote:

7K is a tremendous turnout
Image
pookus
Seniors
Seniors
Posts: 460
Joined: Tue Apr 10, 2012 4:24 pm
Team: North Melbourne
Location:
Has thanked: 0
Been liked: 0

Re: AFL vs NRL (Memberships in 2013)

Post by pookus »

Stewie wrote:
Raiderdave wrote:
Stewie wrote:
the Canberra Raiders RLFC PTY LTD posted a 3.4 Million dollar profit
they have more cash then they know what to do with ... does my club have :wink:
hence them entering the property development business to make tens of millions more


meanwhile poort pennyless
can barely afford loo paper in its office toilets :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

I somehow think poort wheresmedough will struggle to see out this current TV deal
RIP Poweroutage :cool:
Why does the football dept have such a small budget? Why don't they care about them? Is it because they know the actual football team isn't worth the investment? I guess no one would want to pour money into a club that makes a $200k loss on a $10m tiny budget. :lol:

the Raiders have made the finals 8 times in the last 15 years
their football dept gets results , making the Football budget irrelevant because the company's overall bottom line is so very healthy .... if ever there was a decline in football revenue it can be easily covered ... no sponsor
no problem
no TV exposure
no problem

many other clubs in both codes cannot claim the same security
all their eggs in the one basket
like poor ol poort shitzhispants ..... their football dept is a dogs breakfast
spends too much
earns too little

no back ups


& this equals


gooonnnneeeeeeeeeeeeee.................................... :cool:
Wow, the administration doesn't give a crap about the football dept. If they poured a few million more into it, maybe they would get some real success. But they have other interests instead. A football club that doesn't even put the football club first... only in the nRL. :lol:[/quote]

Its a pokie club that fields a football team as a hobby. :lol: :lol: :lol:
Stewie
Coach
Coach
Posts: 2771
Joined: Tue Oct 02, 2012 1:03 pm
Team: Port Adelaide Football Club
Location:
Has thanked: 0
Been liked: 0

Re: AFL vs NRL (Memberships in 2013)

Post by Stewie »

pookus wrote:
Stewie wrote:
Raiderdave wrote:
the Canberra Raiders RLFC PTY LTD posted a 3.4 Million dollar profit
they have more cash then they know what to do with ... does my club have :wink:
hence them entering the property development business to make tens of millions more


meanwhile poort pennyless
can barely afford loo paper in its office toilets :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

I somehow think poort wheresmedough will struggle to see out this current TV deal
RIP Poweroutage :cool:
Why does the football dept have such a small budget? Why don't they care about them? Is it because they know the actual football team isn't worth the investment? I guess no one would want to pour money into a club that makes a $200k loss on a $10m tiny budget. :lol:

the Raiders have made the finals 8 times in the last 15 years
their football dept gets results , making the Football budget irrelevant because the company's overall bottom line is so very healthy .... if ever there was a decline in football revenue it can be easily covered ... no sponsor
no problem
no TV exposure
no problem

many other clubs in both codes cannot claim the same security
all their eggs in the one basket
like poor ol poort shitzhispants ..... their football dept is a dogs breakfast
spends too much
earns too little

no back ups


& this equals


gooonnnneeeeeeeeeeeeee.................................... :cool:
Wow, the administration doesn't give a crap about the football dept. If they poured a few million more into it, maybe they would get some real success. But they have other interests instead. A football club that doesn't even put the football club first... only in the nRL. :lol:[/quote]

Its a pokie club that fields a football team as a hobby. :lol: :lol: :lol:[/quote]
It seems most of Canberra know this, hence the Raiders tiny fan base.
Raiderdave wrote:

7K is a tremendous turnout
Image
Stewie
Coach
Coach
Posts: 2771
Joined: Tue Oct 02, 2012 1:03 pm
Team: Port Adelaide Football Club
Location:
Has thanked: 0
Been liked: 0

Re: AFL vs NRL (Memberships in 2013)

Post by Stewie »

Carlton cracked 35,000 today.
Raiderdave wrote:

7K is a tremendous turnout
Image
User avatar
Raiderdave
Coach
Coach
Posts: 16700
Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2011 1:10 pm
Team: Canberra
Location:
Has thanked: 0
Been liked: 0

Re: AFL vs NRL (Memberships in 2013)

Post by Raiderdave »

Stewie wrote:
Raiderdave wrote:
Stewie wrote:
the Canberra Raiders RLFC PTY LTD posted a 3.4 Million dollar profit
they have more cash then they know what to do with ... does my club have :wink:
hence them entering the property development business to make tens of millions more


meanwhile poort pennyless
can barely afford loo paper in its office toilets :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

I somehow think poort wheresmedough will struggle to see out this current TV deal
RIP Poweroutage :cool:
Why does the football dept have such a small budget? Why don't they care about them? Is it because they know the actual football team isn't worth the investment? I guess no one would want to pour money into a club that makes a $200k loss on a $10m tiny budget. :lol:

the Raiders have made the finals 8 times in the last 15 years
their football dept gets results , making the Football budget irrelevant because the company's overall bottom line is so very healthy .... if ever there was a decline in football revenue it can be easily covered ... no sponsor
no problem
no TV exposure
no problem

many other clubs in both codes cannot claim the same security
all their eggs in the one basket
like poor ol poort shitzhispants ..... their football dept is a dogs breakfast
spends too much
earns too little

no back ups


& this equals


gooonnnneeeeeeeeeeeeee.................................... :cool:
If they poured a few million more into it, maybe they would get some real success. [/quote]

so the amount poort powerfailure pour into their club dickhead ... that much more ?

&

we'd be broke like poort poweroutage

& also

have no real success like poort lightacandle

8-[
:-k
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

no thanks

we'd rather be building to a premiership & be wealthy too :wink: , instead of heading down the toilet S bend like yr mob :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
RL SOO II 4.194 Million veiwers
RL SOO I 4.068 Million
NRL GF 3.968 Million
VFL Grand Final 3.620 Million
SOO III 3.364 Million
NRL Prelim 2.219 Million
Kangaroos V NZ 1.214 Million

Sookerwhos V Japan 238K :lol:
Locked

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Ahrefs [Bot], Amazon [Bot], Bing [Bot] and 5 guests