King-Eliagh wrote:Regionals Xman, we gotta include the millions upon millions of regional viewers in the stats. Then RL gives the AFL a beltin'. Every time.


King-Eliagh wrote:Regionals Xman, we gotta include the millions upon millions of regional viewers in the stats. Then RL gives the AFL a beltin'. Every time.
xman wrote:KE, why is an even comp important?
http://www.theaustralian.com.au/sport/r ... 6525246762King-Eliagh wrote:I'd like to see your proof Xman.
Brisbane broncos were on FTA TV maybe 17 times last season. Does that sound about right. If they were on FTA TV 17 times and totaled almost 23 million viewers this means that they would have averaged 1.4 million viewers a game on metro only FTA TV (I think they were on FTA TV 17 times is that right?). That just cant be right. Therefore this total must be metro+ regionals + Foxtel games.Brisbane was the most popular team with 22.91 million viewers followed by the Bulldogs with 21.80 million and South Sydney with 19.75 million.
Collingwood were on FTA TV maybe 14 times which would suggest that they averaged about 1.7 million on FTA metro only, if the data they used was metro only. Does that look about right to you KE?Collingwood was the most watched club with 24.26 million viewers followed by Hawthorn with 22.30 million and premier Sydney with 19.83 million.
Are you suggesting the NRL got 113M from metro only?King-Eliagh wrote:I'd like to see your proof Xman.
Stewie wrote:I'd rather dominate in he 5 cities than in the country.King-Eliagh wrote:Regionals Xman, we gotta include the millions upon millions of regional viewers in the stats. Then RL gives the AFL a beltin'. Every time.
Chappelli wrote:interesting "Rugby League - on the front foot"??? If that's the case, extending the cricket metaphor, they must be playing at a short ball!!! Aussie- always King in OZ. (AFL states 45% of pop, NRL 55% of pop but come a slow 2nd in every stat)= League's just a game invented for Geordies with broken arms.
Raiderdave wrote:Chappelli wrote:interesting "Rugby League - on the front foot"??? If that's the case, extending the cricket metaphor, they must be playing at a short ball!!! Aussie- always King in OZ. (AFL states 45% of pop, NRL 55% of pop but come a slow 2nd in every stat)= League's just a game invented for Geordies with broken arms.
every stat eh
131 Million people watched RL on TV in 2012
8 Million more then that Victorian abomination C head
but is our rep season included shirt lifter ?Xman wrote:King-Eliagh wrote:Regionals Xman, we gotta include the millions upon millions of regional viewers in the stats. Then RL gives the AFL a beltin'. Every time.![]()
they include regionals dumbarse! f it was a metro comparison it wouldnt even be close!
You have no idea Whats included or what isn't! All we know is the AFL beat the NRL.Raiderdave wrote:but is our rep season included shirt lifter ?Xman wrote:King-Eliagh wrote:Regionals Xman, we gotta include the millions upon millions of regional viewers in the stats. Then RL gives the AFL a beltin'. Every time.![]()
they include regionals dumbarse! f it was a metro comparison it wouldnt even be close!
no ?
RL 131 Million
Vicky Kicky 123 Million
debate ends
Xman wrote:Raiderdave wrote:Chappelli wrote:interesting "Rugby League - on the front foot"??? If that's the case, extending the cricket metaphor, they must be playing at a short ball!!! Aussie- always King in OZ. (AFL states 45% of pop, NRL 55% of pop but come a slow 2nd in every stat)= League's just a game invented for Geordies with broken arms.
every stat eh
131 Million people watched RL on TV in 2012
8 Million more then that Victorian abomination C headprove it!
VFL's 123 Million includes all.............. VFL games playedXman wrote:You have no idea Whats included or what isn't! All we know is the AFL beat the NRL.Raiderdave wrote:but is our rep season included shirt lifter ?Xman wrote:![]()
they include regionals dumbarse! f it was a metro comparison it wouldnt even be close!
no ?
RL 131 Million
Vicky Kicky 123 Million
debate ends![]()
![]()
Well pies man showed thats rubbish didnt he Dave?Raiderdave wrote:VFL's 123 Million includes all.............. VFL games playedXman wrote:You have no idea Whats included or what isn't! All we know is the AFL beat the NRL.Raiderdave wrote:but is our rep season included shirt lifter ?
no ?
RL 131 Million
Vicky Kicky 123 Million
debate ends![]()
![]()
quite obviously![]()
RL's 131 Million is the NRL & our rep season
read it n weep ... bitch
piesman couldn't convince an eskimo into buying a heater .....Xman wrote:Well pies man showed thats rubbish didnt he Dave?Raiderdave wrote:VFL's 123 Million includes all.............. VFL games playedXman wrote:You have no idea Whats included or what isn't! All we know is the AFL beat the NRL.![]()
![]()
quite obviously![]()
RL's 131 Million is the NRL & our rep season
read it n weep ... bitch
Users browsing this forum: Ahrefs [Bot], Amazon [Bot], Bing [Bot] and 9 guests