That's the point dumbarse! Owners shouldn't have to fund their club if they are self sufficient!Raiderdave wrote:Xman wrote:It highlighted the fact that news forked out 60 odd million in 5 years. Why would they do that if the storm were self sufficient?Raiderdave wrote:and yet you seem to know they lose 12m every year based on nothing more then an article which clearly states .. the 12m is expenditure ... not a loss
I mean .. what sort of fuckwit are you ?![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Storm .... self sufficient![]()
![]()
![]()
all it said was news supplies funds for their costs
well of course they do
who else would ?![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
marcus .. what a tool![]()

If a teams revenue is supplied by sponsorships, gate receipts, memberships and the league grant they don't need funds from an owner!

The storm needed 65m in 5 years! Why? Because they have few supporters, crowds, sponsors, or members! :D