They're fucked because they opted for private ownership
yes .... they could be as much as to 42 Million dollars ahead of your lot .... but they're the ones that .. F/ucked up
side splitting stuff
That'll last a few seasons only....then what happens?
yes ... they have no other sources of income ... none at all
RL SOO II 4.194 Million veiwers
RL SOO I 4.068 Million
NRL GF 3.968 Million
VFL Grand Final 3.620 Million
SOO III 3.364 Million
NRL Prelim 2.219 Million
Kangaroos V NZ 1.214 Million
That'll last a few seasons only....then what happens?
yes ... they have no other sources of income ... none at all
They'll run out , then its over.
When will the NRL learn about the dangers of private ownership?!
they'll run out wil they ?
haven't run out in the last 25 years ... but will now
RL SOO II 4.194 Million veiwers
RL SOO I 4.068 Million
NRL GF 3.968 Million
VFL Grand Final 3.620 Million
SOO III 3.364 Million
NRL Prelim 2.219 Million
Kangaroos V NZ 1.214 Million
When will the NRL learn about the dangers of private ownership?!
they'll run out wil they ?
haven't run out in the last 25 years ... but will now
Imagine relying on a fuckwit like Tinkler who's next Clive
yeah .... lucky they didn't take him at his word & had 20 million put aside if he he went under eh
geez some VFL clubs wouldn't mind having that sorta dough as back up eh ... poohfiddler ?
RL SOO II 4.194 Million veiwers
RL SOO I 4.068 Million
NRL GF 3.968 Million
VFL Grand Final 3.620 Million
SOO III 3.364 Million
NRL Prelim 2.219 Million
Kangaroos V NZ 1.214 Million
they'll run out wil they ?
haven't run out in the last 25 years ... but will now
Imagine relying on a fuckwit like Tinkler who's next Clive
yeah .... lucky they didn't take him at his word & had 20 million put aside if he he went under eh
geez some VFL clubs wouldn't mind having that sorta dough as back up eh ... poohfiddler ?
We dont have to you moron we the members own our clubs dave.They cant be taken off us and they are secure with footy income.Not owned by leagues clubs or fat millionaires,the people dave.We dont rise and fall on the backs of others,We are the AFL not the national pokie league
Imagine relying on a fuckwit like Tinkler who's next Clive
yeah .... lucky they didn't take him at his word & had 20 million put aside if he he went under eh
geez some VFL clubs wouldn't mind having that sorta dough as back up eh ... poohfiddler ?
We dont have to you moron we the members own our clubs dave.
this news just in
Poort Snortelaide post a 6.3 Million dollar loss in 2012... while the Paddle pop wions post a 2.6 Million dollar loss
along with about 7 other VFL clubs who either also finished in the red .. or cost the VFL 40 Million dollars to run in 2012
reality & you
like ships in the night
just passing by aren't yuz
RL SOO II 4.194 Million veiwers
RL SOO I 4.068 Million
NRL GF 3.968 Million
VFL Grand Final 3.620 Million
SOO III 3.364 Million
NRL Prelim 2.219 Million
Kangaroos V NZ 1.214 Million
What, Tinks stuffs up, the Knights have $20 mill in the bank, the club gets sold back for $1, the members take ownership.
What's the problem if they already have $20 mill in the bank and a competitive team on the park with one of the best coaches who's obviously been paid or he wouldn't be there, so what's the problem, if Tinks goes, the club will still be run and all that will happen is it will be sold to someone else, or the members will do their own thing.
signature removed by Admin.
User has been banned for this and similar comments.
What, Tinks stuffs up, the Knights have $20 mill in the bank, the club gets sold back for $1, the members take ownership.
What's the problem if they already have $20 mill in the bank and a competitive team on the park with one of the best coaches who's obviously been paid or he wouldn't be there, so what's the problem, if Tinks goes, the club will still be run and all that will happen is it will be sold to someone else, or the members will do their own thing.
The members take ownership? Now they are stuffed!
King-Eliagh: ...I believe [RL] is popular in all the other states and territories, bar tasmania.
Audit proves Nathan Tinkler made good on promises to Newcastle Knights
MILLIONAIRE Nathan Tinkler's troubled empire is set to be boosted by a $10 million windfall next week with an independent financial audit of the Newcastle Knights poised to finally end immediate speculation over his ownership of the club.
Knights officials claim the audit proves Tinkler has honoured all terms and conditions of his 2011 takeover of the club, with the document to go before a meeting of the Knights Members' board tomorrow morning for ratification.
"It's pretty clear-cut - everything Nathan said he would deliver on he has and the audit spells it all out," Knights CEO Matt Gidley said. "There's been a lot of speculation surrounding all this but there was never really any dramas from our point of view. We are just focused now on the season ahead.
"No one should doubt Nathan's commitment to the club and to Newcastle. To raise $10 million in sponsorship and his commitment to junior development and the Newcastle league - it speaks for itself."
The audit, conducted by Crosbie Warren Sinclair, is understood to confirm Tinkler has made good on his promise to guarantee the club sponsorship of $10 million last year in addition to providing funding of $2.5 million for junior development and $300,000 for the running of the Newcastle Rugby League and working capital for the day-to- day running of the club.
A $20 million bank guarantee provided by Tinkler was another cornerstone of the takeover agreement and a safeguard should Tinkler default on any of his commitments.
Tinkler will pocket almost half of that on January 31 with the guarantee to revert to $10.3 million on that date provided the audit is rubber-stamped by the Members' club at tomorrow's meeting.
Members' club chairman Nick Dan took possession of the audit last Friday but refused to speculate on the outcome of the meeting.
He did confirm that he has already sought clarification from the auditors on a couple of points in the document.
"I've asked a few questions of the auditors already and I've asked my board to get back to me before the meeting if they have any queries," Dan said yesterday.
LINK
Well that settles that. Newcastle rolling in it
"The Victorian game may be the best game of football, but if it is so manifestly superior, one would fancy it could plead its own cause, and not require advertising like a quack pill."
