piesman2011 wrote:ParraEelsNRL wrote:$25 million, are you fully ********, or pretty much just below full blown retardation?
Where the fuck do you Vfl fans get $25 Million from?
25 million comes for 100 million take away 75 million for the naming rights (which was how much the NRL got last time). So some are figuring that the media rights are worth 25 million.
No not testy at all, I can handle trolls who are funny and original to get a laugh, I just can't stand full blown liars who instead of trolling for the fun of it, they decide to go on a crusade and post any irrelevant garbage as possible.Xman wrote:Someones a bit testy today...ParraEelsNRL wrote:$5 million a year aye Xtard?
I'd love to see a link where the NRL will be getting $5 million a year for their online rights, back it up with some facts boggerboy or admit you're nothing but a lying piece of shit.
Naaaaa, you can't admit anything, you're a pathetic fraud.
Whats wrong Parra?
Telstra were already paying the NRL 75M over 5 years for the naming rights. Now theyre paying 100M for naming and media rights. Thats 25M for media rights isnt it? =D>
Go back and look at the media releases that were released about 22nd August when the original deal was done. You will see that Fox bought in that deal the media rights for Tablets to their 5 games. Either those rights are worth a good amount or the media rights to the NRL are not worth much. The only other possibility is that the naming rights are worth less today then the 75 million the NRL got for them 5 years ago. (NRL just got 100 million for naming rights + the rest of the media/phone/online rights). I could be wrong but I think I am at least being logical.ParraEelsNRL wrote:piesman2011 wrote:Most of the media rights was packaged away to fox already so it is impossible to stay how much the media rights were sold for. Its all a bit of smoke and mirrors trying to make their deal look bigger then it really is. But having said that it is still going to be the second biggest deal for Sports TV/media rights in Australia and only a little off the first placed rights.
Prove it, should be easy so go for it mr knows everything about RL from what clubs make to when the eels ceo takes a dump.
Yep, youre testy..got your period?ParraEelsNRL wrote:No not testy at all, I can handle trolls who are funny and original to get a laugh, I just can't stand full blown liars who instead of trolling for the fun of it, they decide to go on a crusade and post any irrelevant garbage as possible.Xman wrote:Someones a bit testy today...ParraEelsNRL wrote:$5 million a year aye Xtard?
I'd love to see a link where the NRL will be getting $5 million a year for their online rights, back it up with some facts boggerboy or admit you're nothing but a lying piece of shit.
Naaaaa, you can't admit anything, you're a pathetic fraud.
Whats wrong Parra?
Telstra were already paying the NRL 75M over 5 years for the naming rights. Now theyre paying 100M for naming and media rights. Thats 25M for media rights isnt it? =D>
As I said, you're a fraud.
piesman2011 wrote:Go back and look at the media releases that were released about 22nd August when the original deal was done. You will see that Fox bought in that deal the media rights for Tablets to their 5 games. Either those rights are worth a good amount or the media rights to the NRL are not worth much. The only other possibility is that the naming rights are worth less today then the 75 million the NRL got for them 5 years ago. (NRL just got 100 million for naming rights + the rest of the media/phone/online rights). I could be wrong but I think I am at least being logical.ParraEelsNRL wrote:piesman2011 wrote:Most of the media rights was packaged away to fox already so it is impossible to stay how much the media rights were sold for. Its all a bit of smoke and mirrors trying to make their deal look bigger then it really is. But having said that it is still going to be the second biggest deal for Sports TV/media rights in Australia and only a little off the first placed rights.
Prove it, should be easy so go for it mr knows everything about RL from what clubs make to when the eels ceo takes a dump.
Naming rights was already 75M over 5 years. What does that leave Parra?ParraEelsNRL wrote:And how stupid can you be, Telstra is paying $100 million for naming rights and 3 exclusive game compared to all games last year and the years before, how the fuck does that equate to $5 million a season?
Ahhh, so when you said 200M you meant with naming rights included?ParraEelsNRL wrote:I said $200 m at least, even mr fraud quoted that, so hop am I wrong when I'm already half way there with a more expensive part to be sold still?
desperate much?Xman wrote:Ahhh, so when you said 200M you meant with naming rights included?ParraEelsNRL wrote:I said $200 m at least, even mr fraud quoted that, so hop am I wrong when I'm already half way there with a more expensive part to be sold still?
So what you are saying is that the 75 million last time was for the naming rights + the media rights ok that makes sense I guess. Now that you have explained that you can stop sooking. I assumed that the 75 million was for for the naming rights (it has been reported as such on this thread) only a link would be goodParraEelsNRL wrote:piesman2011 wrote:Go back and look at the media releases that were released about 22nd August when the original deal was done. You will see that Fox bought in that deal the media rights for Tablets to their 5 games. Either those rights are worth a good amount or the media rights to the NRL are not worth much. The only other possibility is that the naming rights are worth less today then the 75 million the NRL got for them 5 years ago. (NRL just got 100 million for naming rights + the rest of the media/phone/online rights). I could be wrong but I think I am at least being logical.ParraEelsNRL wrote:
Prove it, should be easy so go for it mr knows everything about RL from what clubs make to when the eels ceo takes a dump.
I've looked you pathetic sook and I have read it numerous times, just because you and your ******** mates here never got past comprehension isn't my fucking fault.
What about last time, it has nothing to do with this time.piesman2011 wrote:So what you are saying is that the 75 million last time was for the naming rights + the media rights ok that makes sense I guess. Now that you have explained that you can stop sooking. I assumed that the 75 million for for the naming rights only a link would be goodParraEelsNRL wrote:piesman2011 wrote:Go back and look at the media releases that were released about 22nd August when the original deal was done. You will see that Fox bought in that deal the media rights for Tablets to their 5 games. Either those rights are worth a good amount or the media rights to the NRL are not worth much. The only other possibility is that the naming rights are worth less today then the 75 million the NRL got for them 5 years ago. (NRL just got 100 million for naming rights + the rest of the media/phone/online rights). I could be wrong but I think I am at least being logical.
I've looked you pathetic sook and I have read it numerous times, just because you and your ******** mates here never got past comprehension isn't my fucking fault.
Telstra and ARLC to set up media unit under sponsorship and rights deal
by: Mitchell Bingemann
From: The Australian
December 12, 2012 2:26PM
TELSTRA and the Australian Rugby League Commission will set up their own media unit to report on the NRL after the two entities signed a sponsorship and digital rights partnership worth more than $100 million.
Under the five-year deal Telstra has agreed to double the $90 million it is believed to have paid the ARLC in 2007. In return it gains the exclusive broadcast rights to stream live rugby league matches to mobile phones and tablets regardless of their carrier.
This means that customer on Optus and Vodafone mobile networks will be able to access NRL matches on smartphones and tablets but will likely have to pay a subscription fee to Telstra.
Telstra would not disclose the commercial value of the contract but ARLC chairman John Grant said the deal was worth “double” in cash and contra to their previous deal.
“We have agreed with Telstra not to disclose the full value of that contract however we do acknowledge that it is double what we got in the last contract rights period. So it’s a very significant lift to the bottom line and it’s a very significant opportunity to build for the future through a digital platform,”
The deal will see Telstra also acquire naming rights to the Premiership and Sunday Football, operation of the NRL website and related team sites, the official NRL app and the official NRL fantasy games.
In a move reminiscent of the AFL establishing its own online media division, Telstra and the ARLC today announced they too would set up their own media unit and employ journalists to report on NRL matches and the goings on within the sport. The NRL media unit will also stream exclusive post game access and press conferences to mobile and tablet devices.
“We’re going to push a few boundaries I think and I think it’s very exciting,” said Telstra chief executive David Thodey.
Fox Sports, which has rights for the other five NRL matches every week, gained the internet protocol television (IPTV) and tablet rights for the matches it will broadcast when the ARLC signed its five-year, $1.05 billion agreement with Fox and Nine in August. Telstra plans to stream those matches granted to Fox Sports through the telco’s own IPTV system, the T-Box.
“Over twelve years Telstra has been a key partner at every level of the game and we are delighted they have extended their commitment to rugby league,” interim ARLC chief executive Shane Mattiske said.
“This extended partnership will see a significant investment in innovation that will deeply engage more fans than ever before in the excitement of rugby league.”
