Raiderdave wrote:2009 downXman wrote:wrong...Raiderdave wrote:
so did the swines ..... for the 4th year in a row
2010 down
2011 down
2012 down
so thats .... 1 2 3 4.........
the only one wrong here .... is you

How'd that work for ya?

Raiderdave wrote:2009 downXman wrote:wrong...Raiderdave wrote:
so did the swines ..... for the 4th year in a row
2010 down
2011 down
2012 down
so thats .... 1 2 3 4.........
the only one wrong here .... is you
Milling around everywhere but the games!King-Eliagh wrote:Viewers watching RL on tv in melbourne increased quite significantly as far as I know. And on my frequent travels to melbourne over the past years I cant help but notice the growing number of storm supporters milling about at pubs, train stations and other venues. It's good to see and melbourne is big enough for both codes. Embrace it stewie, like thousands and thousands of other melbournians are doing, god blessum :DStewie wrote:Really? Their average crowd went down this year, despite making the prelims last year and having another succeful year this yearKing-Eliagh wrote:RL is building in melbourne and it sickens you poor bastards to death
I wonder how it makes you feel slowly seeing the integration of RL in the city? The population of men growing muscular, necks disappearing, toughness increasing, and on field biffo being conducted![]()
Embrace it folks, its there to stay :D
Funny how your avoiding the storms support and claiming SOO.King-Eliagh wrote:TV viewers Xman. On several nights this year more than one in ten households across the entire city...(you know what 'across' means right?Xman wrote:Please provide evidence for this growth. The storms crowd averages suggest they havent grown at all despite them playing in 5 of the last 8 NRL GF's. Notice how the Lions crowds almost doubled in their succesful era. For the Storm to be on par they should have an average crowd of 24k. Not to mention Melbourne is twice the size of Brisbane.King-Eliagh wrote:RL is building in melbourne and it sickens you poor bastards to death
I wonder how it makes you feel slowly seeing the integration of RL in the city? The population of men growing muscular, necks disappearing, toughness increasing, and on field biffo being conducted![]()
Embrace it folks, its there to stay :D
Theres some facts for ya) loved their RL. Additionally melbourne storm crowds have increased since they entered the league as has tv viewing, considerably :D
Its growing big time and it sickens you poor bastards. Embrace it Xman, its there and growing whether you like it or not :D
xman wrote:KE, why is an even comp important?
SOO may be growing in popularity but the Storm are failing to win support despite huge success. That suggests SOO is a good concept but overall RL and the NRL is not of any interest to Melbourne.King-Eliagh wrote:Ahh I said RL is building in melbourne. SOO is not RL?
You silly silly twat Xman!
Think --- Consider --- and then post Xman
at least we have something that works in your codes capitalXman wrote:SOO may be growing in popularity but the Storm are failing to win support despite huge success. That suggests SOO is a good concept but overall RL and the NRL is not of any interest to Melbourne.King-Eliagh wrote:Ahh I said RL is building in melbourne. SOO is not RL?
You silly silly twat Xman!
Think --- Consider --- and then post Xman
xman wrote:KE, why is an even comp important?
Raiderdave wrote:at least we have something that works in your codes capitalXman wrote:SOO may be growing in popularity but the Storm are failing to win support despite huge success. That suggests SOO is a good concept but overall RL and the NRL is not of any interest to Melbourne.King-Eliagh wrote:Ahh I said RL is building in melbourne. SOO is not RL?
You silly silly twat Xman!
Think --- Consider --- and then post Xman
when you get something that works in ours .... drop us a line
xman wrote:KE, why is an even comp important?
hmmm, a team with more members and crowds than ANY Sydney NRL team, hows that?Raiderdave wrote:at least we have something that works in your codes capitalXman wrote:SOO may be growing in popularity but the Storm are failing to win support despite huge success. That suggests SOO is a good concept but overall RL and the NRL is not of any interest to Melbourne.King-Eliagh wrote:Ahh I said RL is building in melbourne. SOO is not RL?
You silly silly twat Xman!
Think --- Consider --- and then post Xman
when you get something that works in ours .... drop us a line
That'd be the Sydney Swans, Raiderdave. Been working well for 18 years now =D>Raiderdave wrote:at least we have something that works in your codes capitalXman wrote:SOO may be growing in popularity but the Storm are failing to win support despite huge success. That suggests SOO is a good concept but overall RL and the NRL is not of any interest to Melbourne.King-Eliagh wrote:Ahh I said RL is building in melbourne. SOO is not RL?
You silly silly twat Xman!
Think --- Consider --- and then post Xman
when you get something that works in ours .... drop us a line
Raiderdave wrote:
7K is a tremendous turnout
If you're referring to your team, it won't make a difference as you cannot sell out your small 20k stadium in the first place, unlike the Wanderers.ParraEelsNRL wrote:I'll think a few of you will be surprised in a couple of years when a certain team from the West renews it's stadium arrangement.
Raiderdave wrote:
7K is a tremendous turnout