AFL V NRL Financial positioning

[Xman]

their revenue is superior to 16 or maybe even 17.. of the 18 VFL clubs at ova 60 Million dollars you half witted gimp
they have banked profits for the last 10 years ( 3.4 mill in 2011) , making them one of the richest cash on hand clubs ... & with 33 million in assets .. one of the wealthiest asset rich clubs .. in Aust sport.
its hurts you .. pains you ... tears you up in side
but try n deal with it
theres a lad.

No, their football revenue is the lowest of any AFL team by a LONG WAY. Its even lower than some A League teams, as are their crowds and member numbers....

so what
we're amongst the best run sporting franchises in the country away from our football operation ....so we don't rely on it & as a result have more money & assets then most VFL clubs & ALL A League clubs ... hell we'd have more half their comp combined.
a lil pocket dynamo .. are the Raiders

with every VFL club .. relying on their football operation , on very very thin margins .. any down turn in income .. or costs rising .. like they are for most VFL clubs ... sees them instantly in the red
& for some clubs .. they have this year after year .. like the ol wions .. or port crapelaide ... north .. etc etc
a cycle of debt , they can't get out of
a massive millstone around the VFL 's neck

dark days ahead
dark days

So well run they can't even get on the TV!

[Raiderdave]

No, their football revenue is the lowest of any AFL team by a LONG WAY. Its even lower than some A League teams, as are their crowds and member numbers....

so what
we're amongst the best run sporting franchises in the country away from our football operation ....so we don't rely on it & as a result have more money & assets then most VFL clubs & ALL A League clubs ... hell we'd have more half their comp combined.
a lil pocket dynamo .. are the Raiders

with every VFL club .. relying on their football operation , on very very thin margins .. any down turn in income .. or costs rising .. like they are for most VFL clubs ... sees them instantly in the red
& for some clubs .. they have this year after year .. like the ol wions .. or port crapelaide ... north .. etc etc
a cycle of debt , they can't get out of
a massive millstone around the VFL 's neck

dark days ahead
dark days

So well run they can't even get on the TV!

and .. yet still hammering most VFL sides for profits ... who get 22 FTA games

like I said .... best run side off field there is

[pussycat]

The AFL have have using the revenue argument for years as some sort of 'badge of honor'. 12 months ago the AFL 's yearly revenue was 330m, the NRL's 170m But with the new TV deal, that figure has jumped to 280m and I'm sure will see some sort of increase from Internet, marketing, radio, sponsorship etc. So the NRL has virtually caught up overnight

Another thing they seem to turn a blind eye to is that revenue matters little if you've got more going out than coming in each year.. They've been losing millions these past years, Making a profit in only 1 of the past 5 years. Last years $24 million dollar loss was the biggest yet - how much longer can Andrew D continue to put a positive spin on these nursery rhymes and fairy tales before one of these brainwashed mushrooms comes of trance like state and see's the light of day???

[Xman]

The AFL have have using the revenue argument for years as some sort of 'badge of honor'. 12 months ago the AFL 's yearly revenue was 330m, the NRL's 170m But with the new TV deal, that figure has jumped to 280m and I'm sure will see some sort of increase from Internet, marketing, radio, sponsorship etc. So the NRL has virtually caught up overnight

Another thing they seem to turn a blind eye to is that revenue matters little if you've got more going out than coming in each year.. They've been losing millions these past years, Making a profit in only 1 of the past 5 years. Last years $24 million dollar loss was the biggest yet - how much longer can Andrew D continue to put a positive spin on these nursery rhymes and fairy tales before one of these brainwashed mushrooms comes of trance like state and see's the light of day???

show us evidence theyve lost money 4 of the last 5 years. How many times does it need to be said? They had a decade of profits and saved money specifically for expansion. The majority of the revenue shortcomings in the last 2 years were for the establishment of 2 new teams, including their stadiums.

As far as revenue goes, more is always better than less. The AFL can cut expenditure. Thats far easier than the NRL coming up with new revenue streams.

[Raiderdave]

The AFL have have using the revenue argument for years as some sort of 'badge of honor'. 12 months ago the AFL 's yearly revenue was 330m, the NRL's 170m But with the new TV deal, that figure has jumped to 280m and I'm sure will see some sort of increase from Internet, marketing, radio, sponsorship etc. So the NRL has virtually caught up overnight

Another thing they seem to turn a blind eye to is that revenue matters little if you've got more going out than coming in each year.. They've been losing millions these past years, Making a profit in only 1 of the past 5 years. Last years $24 million dollar loss was the biggest yet - how much longer can Andrew D continue to put a positive spin on these nursery rhymes and fairy tales before one of these brainwashed mushrooms comes of trance like state and see's the light of day???

. Thats far easier than the NRL coming up with new revenue streams.

we have a new stream .... an extra 170m a year from TV for the next 5 years ..& we got it without raising a sweat
& we won't blow it all on useless expansion sides

NRL..... SWWWEEEEEEETTTTTT

[Xman]

The AFL have have using the revenue argument for years as some sort of 'badge of honor'. 12 months ago the AFL 's yearly revenue was 330m, the NRL's 170m But with the new TV deal, that figure has jumped to 280m and I'm sure will see some sort of increase from Internet, marketing, radio, sponsorship etc. So the NRL has virtually caught up overnight

Another thing they seem to turn a blind eye to is that revenue matters little if you've got more going out than coming in each year.. They've been losing millions these past years, Making a profit in only 1 of the past 5 years. Last years $24 million dollar loss was the biggest yet - how much longer can Andrew D continue to put a positive spin on these nursery rhymes and fairy tales before one of these brainwashed mushrooms comes of trance like state and see's the light of day???

. Thats far easier than the NRL coming up with new revenue streams.

we have a new stream .... an extra 170m a year from TV for the next 5 years ..& we got it without raising a sweat
& we won't blow it all on useless expansion sides

NRL..... SWWWEEEEEEETTTTTT

thats the same source, just an increase. Its locked in for another 5 years. It still leaves the nRL miles behind the AFL in terms of revenue. As I said, the AFL can cut costs. How are the NRL going to increase revenue given they are miles behind even with their new TV deal?

[pussycat]

The AFL have have using the revenue argument for years as some sort of 'badge of honor'. 12 months ago the AFL 's yearly revenue was 330m, the NRL's 170m But with the new TV deal, that figure has jumped to 280m and I'm sure will see some sort of increase from Internet, marketing, radio, sponsorship etc. So the NRL has virtually caught up overnight

Another thing they seem to turn a blind eye to is that revenue matters little if you've got more going out than coming in each year.. They've been losing millions these past years, Making a profit in only 1 of the past 5 years. Last years $24 million dollar loss was the biggest yet - how much longer can Andrew D continue to put a positive spin on these nursery rhymes and fairy tales before one of these brainwashed mushrooms comes of trance like state and see's the light of day???

show us evidence theyve lost money 4 of the last 5 years. How many times does it need to be said? They had a decade of profits and saved money specifically for expansion. The majority of the revenue shortcomings in the last 2 years were for the establishment of 2 new teams, including their stadiums.

As far as revenue goes, more is always better than less. The AFL can cut expenditure. Thats far easier than the NRL coming up with new revenue streams.

I posted it here only a few days back. It was an AFL yearly report.

Our revenue streams are pretty much on par nowadays.

More revenue is not always better either, just ask Alan Bond

[Xman]

The AFL have have using the revenue argument for years as some sort of 'badge of honor'. 12 months ago the AFL 's yearly revenue was 330m, the NRL's 170m But with the new TV deal, that figure has jumped to 280m and I'm sure will see some sort of increase from Internet, marketing, radio, sponsorship etc. So the NRL has virtually caught up overnight

Another thing they seem to turn a blind eye to is that revenue matters little if you've got more going out than coming in each year.. They've been losing millions these past years, Making a profit in only 1 of the past 5 years. Last years $24 million dollar loss was the biggest yet - how much longer can Andrew D continue to put a positive spin on these nursery rhymes and fairy tales before one of these brainwashed mushrooms comes of trance like state and see's the light of day???

show us evidence theyve lost money 4 of the last 5 years. How many times does it need to be said? They had a decade of profits and saved money specifically for expansion. The majority of the revenue shortcomings in the last 2 years were for the establishment of 2 new teams, including their stadiums.

As far as revenue goes, more is always better than less. The AFL can cut expenditure. Thats far easier than the NRL coming up with new revenue streams.

I posted it here only a few days back. It was an AFL yearly report.

Our revenue streams are pretty much on par nowadays.

More revenue is not always better either, just ask Alan Bond

that is utter BS. Our revenue streans arent even close to on par

The 2011 AFL annual report included revenue from the last TV rights. If your comparing the NRLs future yearly earnings to the AAFLs then dont use last years data

[piesman2011]

I thought I would just point out that the NRL has yet to recieve their first payment from their new TV deal. While the AFL is one year into their deal. Currently the AFL V NRL (no clubs) revenue is highly in favour of the AFL. The 2012 annual reports (if the NRL print theirs) will show this.

[Stewie]

The AFL have have using the revenue argument for years as some sort of 'badge of honor'. 12 months ago the AFL 's yearly revenue was 330m, the NRL's 170m But with the new TV deal, that figure has jumped to 280m and I'm sure will see some sort of increase from Internet, marketing, radio, sponsorship etc. So the NRL has virtually caught up overnight

Another thing they seem to turn a blind eye to is that revenue matters little if you've got more going out than coming in each year.. They've been losing millions these past years, Making a profit in only 1 of the past 5 years. Last years $24 million dollar loss was the biggest yet - how much longer can Andrew D continue to put a positive spin on these nursery rhymes and fairy tales before one of these brainwashed mushrooms comes of trance like state and see's the light of day???

show us evidence theyve lost money 4 of the last 5 years. How many times does it need to be said? They had a decade of profits and saved money specifically for expansion. The majority of the revenue shortcomings in the last 2 years were for the establishment of 2 new teams, including their stadiums.

As far as revenue goes, more is always better than less. The AFL can cut expenditure. Thats far easier than the NRL coming up with new revenue streams.

Our revenue streams are pretty much on par nowadays.

What the fuck do you have to be smoking to come up with utter shit like this?

[pussycat]

. Thats far easier than the NRL coming up with new revenue streams.

we have a new stream .... an extra 170m a year from TV for the next 5 years ..& we got it without raising a sweat
& we won't blow it all on useless expansion sides

NRL..... SWWWEEEEEEETTTTTT

thats the same source, just an increase. Its locked in for another 5 years. It still leaves the nRL miles behind the AFL in terms of revenue. As I said, the AFL can cut costs. How are the NRL going to increase revenue given they are miles behind even with their new TV deal?

The revenue figures(NRL/170m , AFL/330m) were pointed out prior to the NRL's TV contract. Formerly about $90m per year , now 200m per year . An increase of 110m. Meaning the NRL's yearly revenue has jumped from $170m to $280m .Still 50m a year short of the AFL, but that's just one area. It stands to reason that the NRL will also see increases in other areas such as radio, I.T., naming rights etc. Meaning the NRL have similar revenue and do not run at a loss each year.

[Xman]

we have a new stream .... an extra 170m a year from TV for the next 5 years ..& we got it without raising a sweat
& we won't blow it all on useless expansion sides

NRL..... SWWWEEEEEEETTTTTT

thats the same source, just an increase. Its locked in for another 5 years. It still leaves the nRL miles behind the AFL in terms of revenue. As I said, the AFL can cut costs. How are the NRL going to increase revenue given they are miles behind even with their new TV deal?

The revenue figures(NRL/170m , AFL/330m) were pointed out prior to the NRL's TV contract. Formerly about $90m per year , now 200m per year . An increase of 110m. Meaning the NRL's yearly revenue has jumped from $170m to $280m .Still 50m a year short of the AFL, but that's just one area. It stands to reason that the NRL will also see increases in other areas such as radio, I.T., naming rights etc. Meaning the NRL have similar revenue and do not run at a loss each year.

And where did you get the AFL figure from genius? Last year? Hmmmm, previous TV deal chump

[pussycat]

I thought I would just point out that the NRL has yet to recieve their first payment from their new TV deal. While the AFL is one year into their deal. Currently the AFL V NRL (no clubs) revenue is highly in favour of the AFL. The 2012 annual reports (if the NRL print theirs) will show this.

I think you will find they received there first payment. And as pointed out in the news, with there new restructuring they are now Australia's wealthiest TV company.

AFL clubs , half of them , are loss makers, relying on the AFL for handouts - A further burden of an organisation soon to be in receivership.

NRL clubs are not established to make money . They are contracted to the NRL but other than an annual grant have no real connection. These clubs have rich powerful backers - millionares , league's clubs and there results wont show up oln the NRL's annual profit and loss report.

[Xman]

I thought I would just point out that the NRL has yet to recieve their first payment from their new TV deal. While the AFL is one year into their deal. Currently the AFL V NRL (no clubs) revenue is highly in favour of the AFL. The 2012 annual reports (if the NRL print theirs) will show this.

I think you will find they received there first payment. And as pointed out in the news, with there new restructuring they are now Australia's wealthiest TV company.

AFL clubs , half of them , are loss makers, relying on the AFL for handouts - A further burden of an organisation soon to be in receivership.

NRL clubs are not established to make money . They are contracted to the NRL but other than an annual grant have no real connection. These clubs have rich powerful backers - millionares , league's clubs and there results wont show up oln the NRL's annual profit and loss report.

which clubs are established to make money
10 clubs made a profit last year Thats 9 more than the NRL
Given the AFL earn 150M a year more than the NRL they have the funds to support a 8 clubs that may make a 2M loss or more.

[Stewie]

NRL clubs are not established to make money . They are contracted to the NRL but other than an annual grant have no real connection.