LOL @ Parramatta Bigger than Collingwood Predictions

[214Four]

"In 2009, the club recorded an $11.7 million loss."
the panthers would prob make one of the lowest revenues from mercandise, sponsers and members in the NRL, but it has the largest revenue in australia from its leagues clubs. the 11.7 million would of been covered in the cash grant the panthers leagues club gives penrith panthers rugby league club every year. The club will never fold or run out of money.



Collingwood reported their revenue at $75 million in 2011, which included the gaming revenue. the actual football clubs revenue was $50 million. with a $1/2 million profit

Canterbury reported their revenue at $16 million in 2011, which was the actual football clubs revenue, and $101 million with the gaming revenue added, and a 1/2 million profit.

Its funny how collingwood likes to release figures with the gamming revenue added to their total amount, whereas the bulldogs didnt, just to make it seem the 'gap' is wider than it really is (a Typical AFL stint really)... It seems it doesnt matter where abouts the person is in the AFL, they will still have an undenying need to fudge figures for their own benefit...

[214Four]

"In 2009, the club recorded an $11.7 million loss."
the panthers would prob make one of the lowest revenues from mercandise, sponsers and members in the NRL, but it has the largest revenue in australia from its leagues clubs. the 11.7 million would of been covered in the cash grant the panthers leagues club gives penrith panthers rugby league club every year. The club will never fold or run out of money.



Collingwood reported their revenue at $75 million in 2011, which included the gaming revenue. the actual football clubs revenue was $50 million. with a $1-2 million profit

Canterbury reported their revenue at $16 million in 2011, which was the actual football clubs revenue, and $101 million with the gaming revenue added, and a $1-2 million profit.

Its funny how collingwood likes to release figures with the gamming revenue added to their total amount, whereas the bulldogs didnt, just to make it seem the 'gap' is wider than it really is (a Typical AFL stint really)... It seems it doesnt matter where abouts the person is in the AFL, they will still have an undenying need to fudge figures for their own benefit...

[Xman]

"In 2009, the club recorded an $11.7 million loss."
the panthers would prob make one of the lowest revenues from mercandise, sponsers and members in the NRL, but it has the largest revenue in australia from its leagues clubs. the 11.7 million would of been covered in the cash grant the panthers leagues club gives penrith panthers rugby league club every year. The club will never fold or run out of money.



Collingwood reported their revenue at $75 million in 2011, which included the gaming revenue. the actual football clubs revenue was $50 million. with a $1/2 million profit

Canterbury reported their revenue at $16 million in 2011, which was the actual football clubs revenue, and $101 million with the gaming revenue added, and a 1/2 million profit.

Its funny how collingwood likes to release figures with the gamming revenue added to their total amount, whereas the bulldogs didnt, just to make it seem the 'gap' is wider than it really is (a Typical AFL stint really)... It seems it doesnt matter where abouts the person is in the AFL, they will still have an undenying need to fudge figures for their own benefit...

Rubbish. The Bulldogs dont release their figures, it appears none of the nRL teams do. Every AFL team releases an annual financial statement. They include their gaming revenue because often their gaming facilities are part of their club, not a seperate club.

SO its no stunt. Whats there to compare to? The nRL financial details arent widely available or reported.

Either way though, the revenue available for AFL clubs to spend on football is substantially higher than nRL clubs, hence the difference in facilities etc for both codes. But what do expect when the AFL have double the crowds and almost 2.5 times the members?

[ParraEelsNRL]

I see my pretty pictures with graphs showing how Parramatta absolutely destroy collinston on TV have been removed.

lol, what a bunch of softcocks.

[ParraEelsNRL]

Aye footlicker?

[Striker]

Because the venue treated us like $hit.

How so?

You realise most AFL teams and fans prefer the MCG. The costs at Etihad are far higher. yet you think theyd have higher crowds there....

MCG capacity 100,000. Etihad 56,000. There's your reason right there. The surface at Etihad has always been sus for AFL.

[ParraEelsNRL]

Because the venue treated us like $hit.

How so?

You realise most AFL teams and fans prefer the MCG. The costs at Etihad are far higher. yet you think theyd have higher crowds there....

MCG capacity 100,000. Etihad 56,000. There's your reason right there. The surface at Etihad has always been sus for AFL.

Too slippery on the tiles in the boggers huh?

[Xman]

Because the venue treated us like $hit.

How so?

You realise most AFL teams and fans prefer the MCG. The costs at Etihad are far higher. yet you think theyd have higher crowds there....

MCG capacity 100,000. Etihad 56,000. There's your reason right there. The surface at Etihad has always been sus for AFL.

How were the storm treated poorly by etihad?

[Striker]

They just didn't really want us in there, so they did everything they could to keep fans from coming. Security being Nazis, that sort of thing.

[ParraEelsNRL]

Tis a wonder the vfl fans haven't cut down the goal posts again where RL is played in Victoria..

[Striker]

PMSL!

[Xman]

They just didn't really want us in there, so they did everything they could to keep fans from coming. Security being Nazis, that sort of thing.

OMG! The security are the same for every sport. There have been media reports of poor Chub security treatment at AFL games too.

Seriously, thats it? Fans stayed away because of security. Now Ive just about heard everything!

[ParraEelsNRL]

Hmmm, same thing was being said about Cricket over the last few years where the fun police have been out in force.

I also see the fun police have stopped the rah rahs from having a Mexican wave during the goal kicks.

But xman thinks it doesn't happen and that these fun police do not impact crowds

[Xman]

Hmmm, same thing was being said about Cricket over the last few years where the fun police have been out in force.

I also see the fun police have stopped the rah rahs from having a Mexican wave during the goal kicks.

But xman thinks it doesn't happen and that these fun police do not impact crowds

Wrong, again.

I said they are the same for every sport. TO suggest the storms poor crowds were because of security is farcicle. To suggest the NRL were treated poorly compared to other sports is farcicle.

[ParraEelsNRL]

I wasn't talking about the storm Xman, I was backing up what Striker said but in regards to all sports and the fun police.