NRL a distant second to the soaring Sydney Swans
Paul Kent
The Daily Telegraph
October 02, 201212:00AM
I HAVE watched the Swans live only four times, but any time soon I expect my life membership to arrive in the mail.
The Swans, it seems, can't afford to do without me.
The first time I watched was 1996, a preliminary final at the SCG which most of you will remember was the night Tony Lockett kicked that after-the-siren behind to steer the Swans into their first grand final since moving to Sydney.
It is still regarded as one of the greatest wins in the club's history.
I didn't go to the grand final the following week, expenses being what they were, and they lost.
The second time was in 2005, when confidence was everywhere that their time was now and so I was there to see them beat West Coast by four in the Grand Final.
Up to then it was the club's greatest win.
The third was 11 days ago, another preliminary final, when the boss heard of my once-a-decade good fortune visited upon them and absolutely insisted I go to the Collingwood final, which they naturally won.
The fourth was Saturday, against raging favourites Hawthorn, when what else could they do but keep the streak alive and win only their second grand final.
As good sporting streaks go, I'd prefer it to be the Melbourne Cup, but so long as they don't start rubbing me for luck before games then being the Swans' talisman isn't all bad news.
For one, Saturday's AFL Grand Final was one of the great contests seen on a football field, an absolute pleasure to watch.
It was a clear points winner over Sunday's NRL decider.
The NRL has serious problems in its game, which it took the Swans victory over Hawthorn to highlight.
The Swans looked gone at the end of the first quarter.
They played nervously the entire first 30 minutes and stayed in the game through a combination of dogged defence and poor accuracy from the Hawks, until Hawthorn kicked clear with three late goals to lead 4-5 (29) to 1-4 (10).
Then came quarter-time, and something special.
Raising their commitment to defence -- nothing but an effort play -- the Swans played their way back into the game by attacking when Hawthorn had the ball.
They went after the Hawks, and their commitment changed the game.
The Bulldogs tackled just as gamely in the NRL, but the rules are such now that once the momentum starts to swing against a team it is like batting back an avalanche with a tennis racquet.
Craig Bellamy acknowledged as much after the game, saying Canterbury used up so much juice during that period it dulled their attack when possession eventually turned their way.
The NRL's concern should be, though, that the Dogs did everything they could have been asked to do but got no reward for their effort.
Once a team establishes dominance under current NRL rules, they win the game.
Because the opposition can't get a crack with the ball, it is virtually impossible to fight your way back into the game.
In past days, defending teams could win the ball against the feed in a scrum, or steal it from a loose carry, or rake it back in the play-the-ball to even the share of possession.
They're either discouraged or illegal under modern rules.
Not so in the AFL, where turnovers are many, and the game benefits because of it.
Saturday's Grand Final ebbed and flowed, rising with the efforts of the players, until the bravery of the Swans won through.
The Bulldogs got no reward for their bravery. They had no option but to soak up tackle after tackle, and no opportunity to take back the ball and fight their way back.
When a team is near perfect, the game is over. And as the weekend proved, so is the spectacle.
Throughout this whole NRL finals series, an anticlimactic series despite the applause for teams one and two winning through to the decider, not a single team fought its way back to win once they lost the early grind.
NRL grand finals were always famous for two teams punching themselves to a standstill, the bravest left standing.
Now it is about completions.
The AFL is where it's at now.
http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/sport/ ... 6486173054
NRL a distant second to the soaring Sydney Swans
- Beaussie
- Site Admin
- Posts: 9561
- Joined: Fri Nov 19, 2004 6:38 pm
- Team: Sydney Swans
- Location: Sydney
- Has thanked: 341 times
- Been liked: 74 times
NRL a distant second to the soaring Sydney Swans
Explains why tv ratings continue to drop year after year in Sydney for the NRL. What ever happened to the specatcle in the NRL? The following from a RL journo sums it up.
- QueenslandISAFL
- Captain
- Posts: 584
- Joined: Mon Sep 17, 2012 2:43 pm
- Team: Brisbane Lions
- Location: AFL Heartland (Brisbane)
- Has thanked: 0
- Been liked: 0
Re: NRL a distant second to the soaring Sydney Swans
Great to see sydney siders embracing the great game of AFL =D> =D> =D>
NRL Fans = Basement Dwelling Virgins
-
- Coach
- Posts: 2771
- Joined: Tue Oct 02, 2012 1:03 pm
- Team: Port Adelaide Football Club
- Location:
- Has thanked: 0
- Been liked: 0
Re: NRL a distant second to the soaring Sydney Swans
I watched 5 minutes of the nRL grand final, couldn't believe how fucking boring and repetitive the sport is. Such a dull spectacle.
Raiderdave wrote:
7K is a tremendous turnout

- Raiderdave
- Coach
- Posts: 16683
- Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2011 1:10 pm
- Team: Canberra
- Location:
- Has thanked: 0
- Been liked: 0
Re: NRL a distant second to the soaring Sydney Swans
scanning scanning ............. News Ltd




RL SOO II 4.194 Million veiwers
RL SOO I 4.068 Million
NRL GF 3.968 Million
VFL Grand Final 3.620 Million
SOO III 3.364 Million
NRL Prelim 2.219 Million
Kangaroos V NZ 1.214 Million
Sookerwhos V Japan 238K
RL SOO I 4.068 Million
NRL GF 3.968 Million
VFL Grand Final 3.620 Million
SOO III 3.364 Million
NRL Prelim 2.219 Million
Kangaroos V NZ 1.214 Million
Sookerwhos V Japan 238K

-
- Coach
- Posts: 2771
- Joined: Tue Oct 02, 2012 1:03 pm
- Team: Port Adelaide Football Club
- Location:
- Has thanked: 0
- Been liked: 0
Re: NRL a distant second to the soaring Sydney Swans
Owners of the Melbourne Storm yeah?Raiderdave wrote:scanning scanning ............. News Ltd![]()
![]()
Raiderdave wrote:
7K is a tremendous turnout

- Raiderdave
- Coach
- Posts: 16683
- Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2011 1:10 pm
- Team: Canberra
- Location:
- Has thanked: 0
- Been liked: 0
Re: NRL a distant second to the soaring Sydney Swans
Stewie wrote:I watched 5 minutes of the nRL grand final, couldn't believe how ******* boring and repetitive the sport is. Such a dull spectacle.
I watched 2 of the Vicky kicky
in that time the ball was fumbled ..... 14 times ... bumbled .. another 5... 8 kicks were made .... all missed their mark


no wonder the least amount of Sydneysiders ever watched this GF with their side in it .... its an abortion that the cat ate ... & threw up



RL SOO II 4.194 Million veiwers
RL SOO I 4.068 Million
NRL GF 3.968 Million
VFL Grand Final 3.620 Million
SOO III 3.364 Million
NRL Prelim 2.219 Million
Kangaroos V NZ 1.214 Million
Sookerwhos V Japan 238K
RL SOO I 4.068 Million
NRL GF 3.968 Million
VFL Grand Final 3.620 Million
SOO III 3.364 Million
NRL Prelim 2.219 Million
Kangaroos V NZ 1.214 Million
Sookerwhos V Japan 238K

- Raiderdave
- Coach
- Posts: 16683
- Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2011 1:10 pm
- Team: Canberra
- Location:
- Has thanked: 0
- Been liked: 0
Re: NRL a distant second to the soaring Sydney Swans
not any more F witStewie wrote:Owners of the Melbourne Storm yeah?Raiderdave wrote:scanning scanning ............. News Ltd![]()
![]()



RL SOO II 4.194 Million veiwers
RL SOO I 4.068 Million
NRL GF 3.968 Million
VFL Grand Final 3.620 Million
SOO III 3.364 Million
NRL Prelim 2.219 Million
Kangaroos V NZ 1.214 Million
Sookerwhos V Japan 238K
RL SOO I 4.068 Million
NRL GF 3.968 Million
VFL Grand Final 3.620 Million
SOO III 3.364 Million
NRL Prelim 2.219 Million
Kangaroos V NZ 1.214 Million
Sookerwhos V Japan 238K

-
- Coach
- Posts: 2771
- Joined: Tue Oct 02, 2012 1:03 pm
- Team: Port Adelaide Football Club
- Location:
- Has thanked: 0
- Been liked: 0
Re: NRL a distant second to the soaring Sydney Swans
Really? Who owns them now? (surely they can't have a members ownership structure. 10k members can only get you so farRaiderdave wrote:not any more F witStewie wrote:Owners of the Melbourne Storm yeah?Raiderdave wrote:scanning scanning ............. News Ltd![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()

Raiderdave wrote:
7K is a tremendous turnout

-
- Seniors
- Posts: 460
- Joined: Tue Apr 10, 2012 4:24 pm
- Team: North Melbourne
- Location:
- Has thanked: 0
- Been liked: 0
Re: NRL a distant second to the soaring Sydney Swans
The owner himself popped in on friday for a chat.Raiderdave wrote:not any more F witStewie wrote:Owners of the Melbourne Storm yeah?Raiderdave wrote:scanning scanning ............. News Ltd![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()




- cos789
- Coach
- Posts: 3276
- Joined: Wed Dec 14, 2011 1:43 pm
- Team: Wookie is a failed pathetic ugly woman
- Location:
- Has thanked: 0
- Been liked: 0
Re: NRL a distant second to the soaring Sydney Swans
Actually this deserves to be in the NRL section.
Some serious analytical points there.
One of the beauties about Australian Football is that at anyone time both teams have equal chance at the ball.
Of course this can lead to blowouts but it does lead to some of the greatest sporting fightbacks known.
NRL needs to look at rl and see if can put some variation in there.
.
Some serious analytical points there.
One of the beauties about Australian Football is that at anyone time both teams have equal chance at the ball.
Of course this can lead to blowouts but it does lead to some of the greatest sporting fightbacks known.
NRL needs to look at rl and see if can put some variation in there.
.
Nice try Cos.
- Raiderdave
- Coach
- Posts: 16683
- Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2011 1:10 pm
- Team: Canberra
- Location:
- Has thanked: 0
- Been liked: 0
Re: NRL a distant second to the soaring Sydney Swans
cos789 wrote:NRL needs to look at rl and see if can put some variation in there.
.
hmmmmmm
so the NRL needs to look at ..... rl..... rugby league.... for some variation ?

ahhhhhhhhhh
are you ******** ?




RL SOO II 4.194 Million veiwers
RL SOO I 4.068 Million
NRL GF 3.968 Million
VFL Grand Final 3.620 Million
SOO III 3.364 Million
NRL Prelim 2.219 Million
Kangaroos V NZ 1.214 Million
Sookerwhos V Japan 238K
RL SOO I 4.068 Million
NRL GF 3.968 Million
VFL Grand Final 3.620 Million
SOO III 3.364 Million
NRL Prelim 2.219 Million
Kangaroos V NZ 1.214 Million
Sookerwhos V Japan 238K

Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Ahrefs [Bot], Bing [Bot] and 4 guests