oh .. my mistakeXman wrote:BS, againRaiderdave wrote:Xman wrote:Massive difference in the comps. The AFL again got double the crowds, far more viewers on TV, and over double the revenue.
less then double the crowds for the first time ever
31500 V 16430
20 years ago it was triple to the fumblers .... its obvious who's growing .. & who's not
the NRL still is watched by more TV veiwers as no one is copping the double counted pay ratings seriously
twice the revenue
but
3 times the costs ........
NRL> VFL
in 1992 the NRL averaged 11.7k per game and the AFL 26k, so just over double.
Since then the NRL have increased 5k average and so have the AFL, despite increasing the interstate games by 4 times. =D>
The NRL hasnt increased TV audience at all wwhile the AFL have increased by 30%. Keep your "double counting" crackpot theory to yourself.![]()
The AFL spends their riches on better stadiums, better facilities, expansion and grass roots development. We've got the cash and we're spending it, while the NRL struggles to keep clubs afloat.
Bigger, richer, better
it wasn't 20 years ago ..... it was only 14

1998 when the VFL average was more then 3 times the NRL's
the VFL fall from grace has been more dramatic then even I realised

bigger eh ?
22 extra games & 260,000 less spectators
richer eh ?
the VFL is about to announce another loss in 2012 with more of its clubs in financial trouble then ever
better eh ?
the largest amount of blow out margins in living memory with the gap between top & bottom further apart then its ever been.
marcus .. keep polishing that turd
it'll shine one day I'm sure of it



