


:P
NRLCrap1 wrote:I never stated I'm right.
NRLCrap1 wrote:call me a skirt lifting sheila.
If you are genuinely interested we would communicate about files by pm and make our own independant judgements and plead our case. If we agree the decision stands. If we disagree an undecided verdict results.MarkZZZ wrote:Sure I would I would first reopen a bs file that I am interested in and award a BS point. I wouldn't lower myself to do that.
Yes you would, and that's why it shouldn't be you.MarkZZZ wrote:Sure I would I would first reopen a bs file that I am interested in and award a BS point. I wouldn't lower myself to do that.
Xman wrote:If you are genuinely interested we would communicate about files by pm and make our own independant judgements and plead our case. If we agree the decision stands. If we disagree an undecided verdict results. And if we disagree twice, you're fired!MarkZZZ wrote:Sure I would I would first reopen a bs file that I am interested in and award a BS point. I wouldn't lower myself to do that.
Interested?
xman wrote:KE, why is an even comp important?
Mr pot, meet Mr Kettle.King-Eliagh wrote:Xman wrote:If you are genuinely interested we would communicate about files by pm and make our own independant judgements and plead our case. If we agree the decision stands. If we disagree an undecided verdict results. And if we disagree twice, you're fired!MarkZZZ wrote:Sure I would I would first reopen a bs file that I am interested in and award a BS point. I wouldn't lower myself to do that.
Interested?![]()
Quote altered for accuracy.
Beaussie the reason Xman gets trashed for being bias is because...he is bias. He cant help it. And he doesnt know he is, so there's no helping him.
xman wrote:KE, why is an even comp important?
King-Eliagh wrote:Oh I know I'm bias, this makes me a better judge. That's the difference between me and Xman :D
No no no, Xman, it goes like this;Xman wrote:King-Eliagh wrote:Oh I know I'm bias, this makes me a better judge. That's the difference between me and Xman :D>
I'm sorry, but I don't agree. Comon MarkZZZ, lets put to an end any further calls of AFL bias in the BS files.King-Eliagh wrote:Xman wrote:If you are genuinely interested we would communicate about files by pm and make our own independant judgements and plead our case. If we agree the decision stands. If we disagree an undecided verdict results. And if we disagree twice, you're fired!MarkZZZ wrote:Sure I would I would first reopen a bs file that I am interested in and award a BS point. I wouldn't lower myself to do that.
Interested?![]()
Quote altered for accuracy.
Beaussie the reason Xman gets trashed for being bias is because...he is bias. He cant help it. And he doesnt know he is, so there's no helping him.
xman wrote:KE, why is an even comp important?
You demonstrated when you had the chance that you couldn't help yourself when it comes to showing your bias towards the NRL. Boardered on the ridiculous hence your removal from the role. As TLPG would say... needed to be said.King-Eliagh wrote:Me I'll admit i've experienced less AFL, and that's why im a better judge![]()
I think Mark would be good also but I'll add in warning that working with Xman is like working with a one eyed turkey with his head stuck in the ground. Unless, he acknowledges his own bias.
xman wrote:KE, why is an even comp important?
Fair enough. Sounds reasonable to me.King-Eliagh wrote:If Mark is to be put forward as a mod i would suggest that he needs to have equal power and can not be "sacked" by Xman but rather sacked by the members if they so wish.