NRL to reap $1.2b from TV rights
-
- Coach
- Posts: 2306
- Joined: Fri Apr 27, 2012 9:52 am
- Team: Collingwood
- Location:
Re: NRL to reap $1.2b from TV rights
http://www.couriermail.com.au/news/the- ... 6458479191
The 10 biggest NRL flops of season 2012
JOHN GRANT
It's not hard to do a $1 billion television deal when Kerry Stokes, Kim Williams, Lachlan Murdoch and David Gyngell are throwing their cash at you. The NRL and new commission have failed to fix the big problem areas in the game - refereeing, mid-season transfers and an inconsistent judiciary.
They also ignored fans in the TV deal by providing no extra free-to-air coverage and switching back to a night grand final.
They eat their own in the RL world.
The 10 biggest NRL flops of season 2012
JOHN GRANT
It's not hard to do a $1 billion television deal when Kerry Stokes, Kim Williams, Lachlan Murdoch and David Gyngell are throwing their cash at you. The NRL and new commission have failed to fix the big problem areas in the game - refereeing, mid-season transfers and an inconsistent judiciary.
They also ignored fans in the TV deal by providing no extra free-to-air coverage and switching back to a night grand final.
They eat their own in the RL world.
Re: NRL to reap $1.2b from TV rights
Sorry where did the claim of equal dollars come from? Perhaps equal value given the NRL did not pay to establish two extra clubs and thus an extra game.
- Raiderdave
- Coach
- Posts: 16683
- Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2011 1:10 pm
- Team: Canberra
- Location:
Re: NRL to reap $1.2b from TV rights
piesman2011 wrote:http://www.couriermail.com.au/news/the- ... 6458479191
The 10 biggest NRL flops of season 2012
JOHN GRANT
It's not hard to do a $1 billion television deal when Kerry Stokes, Kim Williams, Lachlan Murdoch and David Gyngell are throwing their cash at you. The NRL and new commission have failed to fix the big problem areas in the game - refereeing, mid-season transfers and an inconsistent judiciary.
They also ignored fans in the TV deal by providing no extra free-to-air coverage and switching back to a night grand final.
They eat their own in the RL world.



so we've gone from .. its impossible .. to .... its pretty easy
hmmmm lets see

destroying a comps quality but with all games live & having to fund 2 useless sides for god knows how long .. V.. keeping the same good quality .. more then doubling your money .. & keeping the same coverage
its a toughy

the second one .... the second one


RL SOO II 4.194 Million veiwers
RL SOO I 4.068 Million
NRL GF 3.968 Million
VFL Grand Final 3.620 Million
SOO III 3.364 Million
NRL Prelim 2.219 Million
Kangaroos V NZ 1.214 Million
Sookerwhos V Japan 238K
RL SOO I 4.068 Million
NRL GF 3.968 Million
VFL Grand Final 3.620 Million
SOO III 3.364 Million
NRL Prelim 2.219 Million
Kangaroos V NZ 1.214 Million
Sookerwhos V Japan 238K

- Raiderdave
- Coach
- Posts: 16683
- Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2011 1:10 pm
- Team: Canberra
- Location:
Re: NRL to reap $1.2b from TV rights
because our deal isn't 1.025 Bill you D head ...Xman wrote:Please explain how 1.025b is a better deal than 1.253beelofwest wrote:The gyngal wizard.......pookus wrote:Show me how 225 million in cash less is equal.Dont you find it strange that they couldnt find a buyer for internet rights oh thats right theyve already sold 70 percent and left out telstra.Only in the land of the League.A strange place where numbers are fudged,lies are told and egos take center stage.Where men follow the yellow brick road to the Gyngall wizard who will tell you when to play your game.who will play and when you will watch it.Now if he could only give you a brain.lol![]()
Mate all i can say for you is smoking weed it hurts your brain cells :D , time to give up i think...
AFL 18 1.250million minus the 220million minimum for GWS and Suns to survive, minus the 6million dollar marketing tools Khunt and Falou = 1.018million now lets take into account that the AFL average crowd has dropped nearly 4 k this year and it is clear to anyone that the 4FTA games are loosing your clubs huge amount of money through the gate.
NRL 16 1.025million + 100-150million for internet rights and add our broadcast rights for the NZ warriors of 100million = 1.275million
This thread is about TV deals and who got the better deals, financially the NRL deals are far superior by close to 250million. Coverage the AFL is superior end of story.![]()
![]()
![]()
.

it will be considerably bigger then that
most likely bigger then Vicky Kicky's .. in fact its almost assured
take out the major $$ cost in your deal
2 new sides at 220 million .. off your 1.250 Billion ... you have 1.030 Billion left
take off the major $$ cost in our deal



VFL smashed .. by the NRL

and cue this






RL SOO II 4.194 Million veiwers
RL SOO I 4.068 Million
NRL GF 3.968 Million
VFL Grand Final 3.620 Million
SOO III 3.364 Million
NRL Prelim 2.219 Million
Kangaroos V NZ 1.214 Million
Sookerwhos V Japan 238K
RL SOO I 4.068 Million
NRL GF 3.968 Million
VFL Grand Final 3.620 Million
SOO III 3.364 Million
NRL Prelim 2.219 Million
Kangaroos V NZ 1.214 Million
Sookerwhos V Japan 238K

Re: NRL to reap $1.2b from TV rights
Most likely hey? Another of Dave's predictions. We got a far greater amount in the cash component so your placing enormous faith on Internet rights, especially since you've already sold some. 

King-Eliagh: ...I believe [RL] is popular in all the other states and territories, bar tasmania.
- Raiderdave
- Coach
- Posts: 16683
- Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2011 1:10 pm
- Team: Canberra
- Location:
Re: NRL to reap $1.2b from TV rights
Xman wrote:Most likely hey? Another of Dave's predictions. We got a far greater amount in the cash component so your placing enormous faith on Internet rights, especially since you've already sold some.
I've asked you for a prediction on our final rights total F wit
but you seem gun shy ?
a bit hesitent

some of your previous predictions were a little off weren't they ?

but man up
give us what you think our total will be marcus ... come on .. don't be a sheila

RL SOO II 4.194 Million veiwers
RL SOO I 4.068 Million
NRL GF 3.968 Million
VFL Grand Final 3.620 Million
SOO III 3.364 Million
NRL Prelim 2.219 Million
Kangaroos V NZ 1.214 Million
Sookerwhos V Japan 238K
RL SOO I 4.068 Million
NRL GF 3.968 Million
VFL Grand Final 3.620 Million
SOO III 3.364 Million
NRL Prelim 2.219 Million
Kangaroos V NZ 1.214 Million
Sookerwhos V Japan 238K

Re: NRL to reap $1.2b from TV rights
I've answered it before. Less than the AFLs Australian deal, and you know it will be. Your 200m behind and only have a portion of Internet rights to sell.Raiderdave wrote:Xman wrote:Most likely hey? Another of Dave's predictions. We got a far greater amount in the cash component so your placing enormous faith on Internet rights, especially since you've already sold some.
I've asked you for a prediction on our final rights total F wit
but you seem gun shy ?
a bit hesitent![]()
some of your previous predictions were a little off weren't they ?![]()
but man up
give us what you think our total will be marcus ... come on .. don't be a sheila
It's over Dave, over! :D
King-Eliagh: ...I believe [RL] is popular in all the other states and territories, bar tasmania.
- Raiderdave
- Coach
- Posts: 16683
- Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2011 1:10 pm
- Team: Canberra
- Location:
Re: NRL to reap $1.2b from TV rights
Xman wrote:I've answered it before. Less than the AFLs Australian deal, and you know it will be. Your 200m behind and only have a portion of Internet rights to sell.Raiderdave wrote:Xman wrote:Most likely hey? Another of Dave's predictions. We got a far greater amount in the cash component so your placing enormous faith on Internet rights, especially since you've already sold some.
I've asked you for a prediction on our final rights total F wit
but you seem gun shy ?
a bit hesitent![]()
some of your previous predictions were a little off weren't they ?![]()
but man up
give us what you think our total will be marcus ... come on .. don't be a sheila
It's over Dave, over! :D
why would we exclude 100M from NZ ?
what do you think we can't spend it ?

happy for the VFL to include all those nations OS paying heaps to cover it ?





but what ... 50m for online rights ?.... 60M ?
I'll just add our NZ deal ... & we'll see what you think our TOTAL amount will be
& then of course
in the next few months ... we'll get the real total

RL SOO II 4.194 Million veiwers
RL SOO I 4.068 Million
NRL GF 3.968 Million
VFL Grand Final 3.620 Million
SOO III 3.364 Million
NRL Prelim 2.219 Million
Kangaroos V NZ 1.214 Million
Sookerwhos V Japan 238K
RL SOO I 4.068 Million
NRL GF 3.968 Million
VFL Grand Final 3.620 Million
SOO III 3.364 Million
NRL Prelim 2.219 Million
Kangaroos V NZ 1.214 Million
Sookerwhos V Japan 238K

Re: NRL to reap $1.2b from TV rights
Quick geography lesson for Dave: NZ isn't part of Australia!
The Australian component of each deal shows the value of each code to the Australian TV networks. We're in front and will remain so, because we're Australia's number one sport on TV.
The Australian component of each deal shows the value of each code to the Australian TV networks. We're in front and will remain so, because we're Australia's number one sport on TV.
King-Eliagh: ...I believe [RL] is popular in all the other states and territories, bar tasmania.
- Raiderdave
- Coach
- Posts: 16683
- Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2011 1:10 pm
- Team: Canberra
- Location:
Re: NRL to reap $1.2b from TV rights
Xman wrote:NZ isn't part of Australia!
.
their dough is ....
& we
have more
then you
cue these lil fellas








Last edited by Raiderdave on Fri Sep 07, 2012 2:08 pm, edited 1 time in total.
RL SOO II 4.194 Million veiwers
RL SOO I 4.068 Million
NRL GF 3.968 Million
VFL Grand Final 3.620 Million
SOO III 3.364 Million
NRL Prelim 2.219 Million
Kangaroos V NZ 1.214 Million
Sookerwhos V Japan 238K
RL SOO I 4.068 Million
NRL GF 3.968 Million
VFL Grand Final 3.620 Million
SOO III 3.364 Million
NRL Prelim 2.219 Million
Kangaroos V NZ 1.214 Million
Sookerwhos V Japan 238K

-
- Coach
- Posts: 2306
- Joined: Fri Apr 27, 2012 9:52 am
- Team: Collingwood
- Location:
Re: NRL to reap $1.2b from TV rights
This is NRL V AFL broadcast revenue. Why shouldn't the NRL include their NZ rights, its part of their broadcast revenue. Does it really matter if they end up with a bigger deal overall?
Re: NRL to reap $1.2b from TV rights
They may get a bigger amount overall when NZ is included, time will tell. But the NZ component isn't part of Australia and doesn't indicate the popularity or value of RL in Australia. International yes, but not here. It's like saying basketball is Australia's number one sport because of the nba rights.piesman2011 wrote:This is NRL V AFL broadcast revenue. Why shouldn't the NRL include their NZ rights, its part of their broadcast revenue. Does it really matter if they end up with a bigger deal overall?
King-Eliagh: ...I believe [RL] is popular in all the other states and territories, bar tasmania.
-
- Coach
- Posts: 2306
- Joined: Fri Apr 27, 2012 9:52 am
- Team: Collingwood
- Location:
Re: NRL to reap $1.2b from TV rights
I think we are comparing the NRL with the AFL and if the NRL get the bigger broadcast deal overall it doesn't matter if some of that deal comes from outside of Australia. Just my opinion.
Re: NRL to reap $1.2b from TV rights
I'm comparing the value of each code to Australian tv. It's like last years GF when the NRL claimed they won after including NZ ratings. What's that got to do with Australia?piesman2011 wrote:I think we are comparing the NRL with the AFL and if the NRL get the bigger broadcast deal overall it doesn't matter if some of that deal comes from outside of Australia. Just my opinion.
King-Eliagh: ...I believe [RL] is popular in all the other states and territories, bar tasmania.
-
- Coach
- Posts: 6620
- Joined: Fri Jul 04, 2008 10:50 pm
- Team: The Shanghai Sharks
- Location: far away
Re: NRL to reap $1.2b from TV rights
Xman wrote:They may get a bigger amount overall when NZ is included, time will tell. But the NZ component isn't part of Australia and doesn't indicate the popularity or value of RL in Australia. International yes, but not here. It's like saying basketball is Australia's number one sport because of the nba rights.piesman2011 wrote:This is NRL V AFL broadcast revenue. Why shouldn't the NRL include their NZ rights, its part of their broadcast revenue. Does it really matter if they end up with a bigger deal overall?
The NZ Warriors are a team in the NRL. Because of that Sky Sports NZ will pay around 20m a year to watcn the NRL. It's No different to the TV money that comes from CH 7 /9 /Fox or formally Ch10.
Just because nobody else wants any part of the AFL, who exist, toally in there dingy little corner . Does not mean that the rest of the world should practice celibacy.
Rugby League, the dominant force in Australian sport!
"I do like annoying the Victorians; they are so easy to get, At times I've looked at them and had a giggle." Peter V'Landys

"I do like annoying the Victorians; they are so easy to get, At times I've looked at them and had a giggle." Peter V'Landys