It is not, and that is why I have rightly labelled you racist. You also invalidated the Anglo-Saxon bigotry admission by claiming that there was more ethnicity in the NRL, which is also not true. I have in the past challenged you to name the 52 countries (at minimum) that is and has been represented in the NRL. The AFL is represented by 51 and that has been backed up already.King-Eliagh wrote:On evidence the AFL has a larger problem with racism, that's clear as day.
You have not agreed to the rightful terms I have laid down. The failure to do so is proof that I am right.
There is no shame in an Aborigine being IDed as full blood. You are engaging in reverse racism by claiming otherwise.