So you're happy to add FTA metro to regional ratings because they are concurrent, and the NRLs FN FTA ratings from concurrent games, but not the AFLs concurrent payTV and FTA ratings.pussycat wrote:There posted above, 7 NRL games in the top 10 for FTA and 8/10 for PTV.
Xman wrote:So you're happy to add FTA metro to regional ratings because they are concurrent, and the NRLs FN FTA ratings from concurrent games, but not the AFLs concurrent payTV and FTA ratings.pussycat wrote:There posted above, 7 NRL games in the top 10 for FTA and 8/10 for PTV.
Why is that?
pussycat wrote:There posted above, 6 NRL games in the top 10 for FTA and 8/10 for PTV without rep games , but we have rep games-don't we] , so its not even a contest.
I get what you saying Pies but you cant leave out rep games because the AFL don't have any, who fault is that? Certainly not the NRL. If anything the NRL comp suffers some what from these rep games ie, SOO, Tests, Four Nations, RLWC. So these ratings should be counted as rugby leagues strength and not discarded like they don't matter.piesman2011 wrote:We could compare the ratings of non rep AFL matches with non rep NRL matches and there would barely be one ore two NRL matches in the top 20. You are just picking whatever criteria suits your sport better. At the end of the day most NRL fans are looking at the combined accumulated ratings. This year AFL will win at least in Australia and probabaly in Australia and NZ combined. Despite it being impossible to watch more then 6 AFL matches in most rounds.
I dont ignore ratings - completly the opposite. I just list them in the appropriate category.piesman2011 wrote:pussycat wrote:There posted above, 6 NRL games in the top 10 for FTA and 8/10 for PTV without rep games , but we have rep games-don't we
They are not games they are broadcasts. My point was that it is easy to ignore ratings just because they make my sport of choice look less relavent.
All FTA - prety staight forward.piesman2011 wrote:We could compare the ratings of non rep AFL matches with non rep NRL matches and there would barely be one ore two NRL matches in the top 20. You are just picking whatever criteria suits your sport better. At the end of the day most NRL fans are looking at the combined accumulated ratings. This year AFL will win at least in Australia and probabaly in Australia and NZ combined. Despite it being impossible to watch more then 6 AFL matches in most rounds.
another big win to the NRL on sunday. :D :Dpussycat wrote:All FTA - prety staight forward.piesman2011 wrote:We could compare the ratings of non rep AFL matches with non rep NRL matches and there would barely be one ore two NRL matches in the top 20. You are just picking whatever criteria suits your sport better. At the end of the day most NRL fans are looking at the combined accumulated ratings. This year AFL will win at least in Australia and probabaly in Australia and NZ combined. Despite it being impossible to watch more then 6 AFL matches in most rounds.
All PTV - once again, no trickery there!
BS! It's unfair to include it because it is NOT club sport! The game (whatever it is) relies on clubs to survive! To rely on rep games for wins in whatever manner you want is a massive fail. It also shows a lack of support for the club game, and that's a disaster just waiting to happen!pussycat wrote:Im not fully sure you understand what rep football is! Despite the stupidity factor, it is just plain unfair not to include it.
So you are happy to add the ratings together for your Friday night games but refuse to do the same for the AFLs games shown at the same time?pussycat wrote:Xman wrote:So you're happy to add FTA metro to regional ratings because they are concurrent, and the NRLs FN FTA ratings from concurrent games, but not the AFLs concurrent payTV and FTA ratings.pussycat wrote:There posted above, 7 NRL games in the top 10 for FTA and 8/10 for PTV.
Why is that?
They are the ratings (metro - regional) for the match that is mentoned.
I realize that you have a shithouse competiton , but your lame excuses are just that lame - and they wont cut it, this time
Xman wrote:So you are happy to add the ratings together for your Friday night games but refuse to do the same for the AFLs games shown at the same time?pussycat wrote:Xman wrote:So you're happy to add FTA metro to regional ratings because they are concurrent, and the NRLs FN FTA ratings from concurrent games, but not the AFLs concurrent payTV and FTA ratings.
Why is that?
They are the ratings (metro - regional) for the match that is mentoned.
I realize that you have a shithouse competiton , but your lame excuses are just that lame - and they wont cut it, this time
These ratings are just for 1 game , live/delayed ..... Time for another excuse
You're full of ****!
Users browsing this forum: Ahrefs [Bot], Amazon [Bot], Bing [Bot] and 4 guests
