Bs file claim #26: its generally agreed by the majority of..

Xman · Post by **Xman** » Thu Apr 05, 2012 4:46 pm

Bs file claim #26: its generally agreed by the majority of Australians that RL is better both live & on TV

Claimant: Raiderdave

Challenger: TLPG

Challenged: 5/4/12 1630

King-Eliagh · Post by **King-Eliagh** » Thu Apr 05, 2012 4:51 pm

Heyyy TLPG you're back so soon! :D Shall we dance?

TLPG · Post by **TLPG** » Thu Apr 05, 2012 7:20 pm

Shut up, troll.

This case is clear. Raider is claiming that more than 11 million Australians (that's half our population) believe that thugby is better than footy both live and on TV. Now if he'd just said TV I wouldn't have applied for this file, because thugby works on TV as it's action is concentrated on a small enough area. Footy works far better live because there's a lot going on that TV cameras can't always pick up. Higher attendances at AFL matches than NRL matches bears this out. The difference between the two is huge! TV ratings are a lot closer and can't be used really anyway given the issues with regional ratings. Footy is winning the metro, but thugby is closer there at least. That's the perfect reflection on matters than opposes Raider's BS view.

King-Eliagh · Post by **King-Eliagh** » Sun Apr 08, 2012 7:06 pm

TLPG wrote:
Shut up, troll.

This case is clear. Raider is claiming that more than 11 million Australians (that's half our population) believe that thugby is better than footy both live and on TV. Now if he'd just said TV I wouldn't have applied for this file, because thugby works on TV as it's action is concentrated on a small enough area. Footy works far better live because there's a lot going on that TV cameras can't always pick up. Higher attendances at AFL matches than NRL matches bears this out. The difference between the two is huge! TV ratings are a lot closer and can't be used really anyway given the issues with regional ratings. Footy is winning the metro, but thugby is closer there at least. That's the perfect reflection on matters than opposes Raider's BS view.

This would have to be the most inept attempt to explain a point I've ever come across.

TLPG · Post by **TLPG** » Mon Apr 16, 2012 11:21 pm

Decision please, Xman.

King-Eliagh · Post by **King-Eliagh** » Tue Apr 17, 2012 8:50 am

Yes Xman, lets hear it....here's your cue....

Xman · Post by **Xman** » Wed Apr 18, 2012 7:20 pm

Verdict: bs point to Raiderdave!

Post by **Beaussie** » Wed Apr 18, 2012 9:14 pm

Xman wrote:
Verdict: bs point to Raiderdave!

Good grief another one added to the tally.

TLPG · Post by **TLPG** » Wed Apr 18, 2012 10:36 pm

That surprises you, Beau??

justanotherleaguefan · Thu Apr 19, 2012 9:01 am

LOL at VFL fans awarding BS points

TLPG · Post by **TLPG** » Thu Apr 19, 2012 9:45 am

That's AFL to you, and BS points are awarded when they deserve it. In this case Raider deserves it because he was talking BS.

The end.

Talking Footy

Talking Footy

Bs file claim #26: its generally agreed by the majority of..

Bs file claim #26: its generally agreed by the majority of..

Re: Bs file claim #26: its generally agreed by the majority

Re: Bs file claim #26: its generally agreed by the majority

Re: Bs file claim #26: its generally agreed by the majority

Re: Bs file claim #26: its generally agreed by the majority

Re: Bs file claim #26: its generally agreed by the majority

Re: Bs file claim #26: its generally agreed by the majority

Re: Bs file claim #26: its generally agreed by the majority

Re: Bs file claim #26: its generally agreed by the majority

Re: Bs file claim #26: its generally agreed by the majority

Re: Bs file claim #26: its generally agreed by the majority