Moron! The fact is a longer game can fit in more 10second adds!pussycat wrote:Xman wrote:So the fact they have more games, more live games, more viewable games, rep games and shorter games is not relevant?King-Eliagh wrote:No I'm on with the sheer numbers of viewers recorded as a much more valid indicator of viewer support.
The poll results see through these disparities to reveal the true winner.
The fact that the Super bowl gets billions for a 10sec. add has sweet FA do do with the length of the game & everything to do with its popularity. Without including regional viewers, our numbers are pretty close, on an apples V apples and Oranges V's Oranges basis we are actuall slightly ahead. But when you include test & Origin football there no longer even a contest. Adds during major sporting events is wear the real money from advertising is & its here that we swamp you.
What brain dead moron would advertise during a Swans game, even if it went thee weeks?

Without The regionals the NRL are way behind. Even with the regionals they're behind given the AFL is 50% longer and therefore the rating hours are far longer.