BS file claim#20: (AR's was) invented by two New South Welsh

[King-Eliagh]

KE, If I stabbed you in the neck and blood splattered "across" the floor would it need to cover every part of the floor for the word to be used in context?

No dikkhead. It would have to cover a significant range of the floor to be described as "splattered 'across' the floor" though, wouldnt it.

So Xman tell me, if 'someone' were to pop over into your neck of the woods and decapitate each of your family members, leavng their bodies slumped in the south eastern corner of the kitchen before taking the axe to your legs leaving you bleeding to death amongst your headless kin and there was 6 pools of blood forming in this south eastern corner, would you say the blood was pooled 'across' the room? Or would you say it was pooled in the south eastern corner?

If my family lived predominantly in one area of the house, with a member or two isolated in other rooms, and each were brutally murdered, leaving blood spills in their particular areas, I would say the blood splatter and murder scene was spread across the house.

Cant answer the question? You're a pussy.

[Xman]

I think the examples I used show you do not have to completely traverse something for the word "across" to be used in context.

[King-Eliagh]

Cant answer the question, your just clutching at straws here Xman. You're a pussy.

[Xman]

Cant answer the question, your just clutching at straws here Xman. You're a pussy.

The use of the word "across" can be used in a number of different circumstances and contexts. Whether your specific examples use the word in a similar way isn't really relevant.

[King-Eliagh]

nsw used the word in its correct context. he was referring to the game being played all across the country. his efforts to try and prove the sport of pultja is the same as Marngrook shows how he was referring to the word across in the first instance. he has not proved his claim and i've proved his claim to be false. you are too much of a pussy to give him a bs point xman.

[Xman]

nsw used the word in its correct context. he was referring to the game being played all across the country. his efforts to try and prove the sport of pultja is the same as Marngrook shows how he was referring to the word across in the first instance. he has not proved his claim and i've proved his claim to be false. you are too much of a pussy to give him a bs point xman.

He never said "all" across. He said across. Just like the example I gave, something doesn't need to cover every area of something to be spread or spilled across it. If it is found in a smattering of different locations I think that is what he meant by across. In this context I believe he is correct.

[NSWAFL]

And you are correct, Xman. Dunce has proven nothing except that he is just that. A dunce!

[King-Eliagh]

As I highlighted earlier, in nsw's opening post he clearly indicated that he was using the word "across" to describe the sport being played across a significant range of the Australian nation.

The fact that the game, or a version thereof, was played in two distinct areas miles from each other, it follows that it is possible that it was played in many other places as well. Dunce and anyone else are in no position to deny that possibility on the available evidence. Note that in the Origins link that it mentioned Marn Grook as just one of the many Aboriginal pastimes. Purlja (the name of the game in Central Australia) could well have been one of them.

Xman in your quote below you changed the context of NSW's use of the term for him.

Doesn't this say "and other tribes in the Wimmera, The Mallee and Millewa regions of western Victoria, Australia...the range extended to the Wurundjeri in the Yarra Valley, the Gunai people of Gippsland region in Victoria and the Riverina in south western New South Wales"?

I would say that is across Australia.

And you think you're not biased Xman?

You're a fukking joke. A prize clown. The village idiot. Your corrupting of the process can't be any clearer above.

Go on, give nsw his best and smartest point. He's clearly proved Marngrook was played across Australia

[Xman]

As I highlighted earlier, in nsw's opening post he clearly indicated that he was using the word "across" to describe the sport being played across a significant range of the Australian nation.

The fact that the game, or a version thereof, was played in two distinct areas miles from each other, it follows that it is possible that it was played in many other places as well. Dunce and anyone else are in no position to deny that possibility on the available evidence. Note that in the Origins link that it mentioned Marn Grook as just one of the many Aboriginal pastimes. Purlja (the name of the game in Central Australia) could well have been one of them.

Xman in your quote below you changed the context of NSW's use of the term for him.

Doesn't this say "and other tribes in the Wimmera, The Mallee and Millewa regions of western Victoria, Australia...the range extended to the Wurundjeri in the Yarra Valley, the Gunai people of Gippsland region in Victoria and the Riverina in south western New South Wales"?

I would say that is across Australia.

And you think you're not biased Xman?

You're a ******* joke. A prize clown. The village idiot. Your corrupting of the process can't be any clearer above.

Go on, give nsw his best and smartest point. He's clearly proved Marngrook was played across Australia

Have a tantrum I don't care. His original statement never said completely across or all across or every area. He said it was played across. This comment could easily mean in a number of areas spread out by some distance. He has shown this to be the case. Remember, like all other bs file cases, it is the claimant's context that is taken into account, especially where the interpretation of the claim has some ambiguity. You of all people should appreciate this since you were awarded the first victory under similar ambiguous circumstances!

If you wanted to challenge using an interpretation where across means every area you should have qualified this before challenging. A question such as"are you saying it was played in all states and territories?" would have clarified this ambiguity and you would have been better placed to challenge correctly.

[King-Eliagh]

You are such a dumb fukk Xman.

Remember, like all other bs file cases, it is the claimant's context that is taken into account

You havent taken the context nsw used, you've set your own and gone with that. Get yourself a brain transplant and reread nsw's first post in here.

[Xman]

You are such a dumb fukk Xman.

Remember, like all other bs file cases, it is the claimant's context that is taken into account

You havent taken the context nsw used, you've set your own and gone with that. Get yourself a brain transplant and reread nsw's first post in here.

He knows his context. He obviously knew the available proof because he was all over it. He has subsequently agreed that the context used was similar to how I suggested.

[King-Eliagh]

He sure did prove Marngrook was played across 1/15th of Australia. Give im a best point Xman, "he was all over it"

The BS files, a farce run by a dumb fukk.

[Xman]

He sure did prove Marngrook was played across 1/15th of Australia. Give im a best point Xman, "he was all over it"

The BS files, a farce run by a dumb fukk.

You had your chance. Your bias knew no limits.

[King-Eliagh]

You talking shmack again Xman? Get over yourself wanker and hurry up and give nsw his best point, this file was decided before it began.

[Xman]

Someone needs a hug.

Sounds like I need to give you a few tissues first.