BS file claim#17: The Bronco's currently have more members t

[Xman]

BS file claim#17: The Bronco's currently have more members than the Lions

Claimant: Raiderdave

Challenger: Beaussie

Challenged: 1800 13/2/12

[Beaussie]

In light of the fact Raider doesn't participate in BS files, can we get a decision on this one now. The evidence is in and overwhelmingly clear.

Another BS point to Raider.

Lions - 13,491
http://membership.lions.com.au/

Broncos - 13,416

http://www.broncos.com.au/default.aspx?s=home-old

[NSWAFL]

Unfortunately the Broncos have just this morning updated their numbers to 13,800 (or whatever it was). But we should take this as at the time of the challenge and the Lions were definitely in front then.

[Xman]

Unfortunately the Broncos have just this morning updated their numbers to 13,800 (or whatever it was). But we should take this as at the time of the challenge and the Lions were definitely in front then.

Agreed. The claim was BS when it was made. That's all that counts. The Lions could update theirs in a week and go ahead.

[cooee]

I think the claim should be given the week and the club with the most at the close of the claim wins.

[cooee]

Also the Broncos updated their numbers before the start of business day so that was their total as of yesterday when the claim was made.

[Xman]

Also the Broncos updated their numbers before the start of business day so that was their total as of yesterday when the claim was made.

Really? I saw a post on the same day on LU that had the figures Beaussie quoted. Which exact day did they update their figures?

[cooee]

The Broncos have updated the number some time over night or early this morning. So the number would be correct at the close of business yesterday.

[Xman]

The Broncos have updated the number some time over night or early this morning. So the number would be correct at the close of business yesterday.

Well Radier made his claim at 7.55am yesterdya and Beaussie challenged it at 9.38am.

Therefore Radierdave made a claim before the recent update, so it was BS

[NSWAFL]

I think the claim should be given the week and the club with the most at the close of the claim wins.

Nope, it goes for when the BS call was made. Anything that happens after that is irrelevent.

[Beaussie]

I think the claim should be given the week and the club with the most at the close of the claim wins.

Why don't you butt out. What you're suggesting is absolute BS. The BS claim was made prior to the Broncos update. At that time and all last week the Lions were in front. I note the Lions have yet to update their numbers for this week unlike the Broncos, but that is besides the point. The BS file is about Raiders claim and the time of that claim. At that time I've proven he was talking rubbish as usual. BS point for him.

[justanotherleaguefan]

Your just worried cause Broncos have overtaken the lions and it's gonna stay that way.

[King-Eliagh]

Interesting file once again and a tad disturbing at the same time. Beaussies rushed approach has me sceptical, as well as his claim that the evidence he provided was "overwhelmingly clear" Those numbers were not overwhelmingly clear, somethings fishy about this and although Raider doesnt participate i think his claim may be true, at the time of his claim. Some more thought is needed on this one, and on reading beaussies opening post its clear there's a real pong in the air...

[Beaussie]

Again showing your bias taken to the extreme. Stay out of things you have no understanding of. The numbers are there for all to see. Lions in front. Case closed. BS point to Raider.

[NSWAFL]

Your just worried cause Broncos have overtaken the lions and it's gonna stay that way.

You're dreaming as well, bub! You're as bad as Dave!