King-Eliagh wrote:Nah in my case I cant be bothered supporting what is a biased process, just like dave. To me he's expressed his opinion in many of those claims which get rushed to the BS files by the AFL clowns. Often dave's opinions are correct but not always easily proven on an internet forum. I think that's why the AFL fans froth at the mouth in rage at his expert opinions, they cut to the bone and wound you poor folks. Good for you guys that you have the shoddy bandaid solution that is the BS files. Deep down though, this doesnt fix the issues the AFL has, and me thinks as ignorant as you appear, that you all know the score.
So, do you agree with his opinions on auskick, AFL tv ratings, NRL tv ratings in NZ, tennis commentators in Melbourne, etc?
Behaviour like Dave's is exactly why the BS file was introduced. He regularly makes statements as fact despite having no proof. Example: according to Dave almost all auskick programs in NSW and QLD are run through schools where kids are forced to participated and then counted as ARs players. He thinks that auskick participants never actually play games of ARs. How has he come to this conclusion? His daughter's experience.
Yet when confronted by proof he says the entire process is corrupt. What is corrupt? He has every chance to prove his case. He cannot because he has no case.
When will he learn to accompany his opinions with "IMO" and understand his comment, unless based on proof, are just his opinion, not fact?