Foxtel considers Rugby League a downmarket product
-
- Coach
- Posts: 9495
- Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2011 7:52 am
- Team: Parramatta
- Location: Rugby League Heartland
- Has thanked: 14 times
- Been liked: 9 times
Re: Foxtel considers Rugby League a downmarket product
Good luck Dave, just remember, when you smash them from pillar to post, they'll move the goal posts.
signature removed by Admin.
User has been banned for this and similar comments.
User has been banned for this and similar comments.
-
- Coach
- Posts: 2402
- Joined: Tue Jun 21, 2011 8:48 pm
- Team: Sydney Hills Eagles
- Location:
- Has thanked: 0
- Been liked: 0
Re: Foxtel considers Rugby League a downmarket product
Right!Raiderdave wrote:NSWAFL wrote:Dave I notice that you have covered a period SINCE the demise of the original Fox Footy. Now that they're back - up go the ratings!
Not that I believe you on saying they're dropping!
you mean the foxtel show that couldn't muster enough ratings ... so they closed it down
Provide evidence that the original Fox Footy was shut down because of poor ratings.
Or I'm calling BS on it!
- Beaussie
- Site Admin
- Posts: 9556
- Joined: Fri Nov 19, 2004 6:38 pm
- Team: Sydney Swans
- Location: Sydney
- Has thanked: 340 times
- Been liked: 74 times
Re: Foxtel considers Rugby League a downmarket product
Foxtel continues to tell it like it is. Good luck with your tv deal NRL.



Fox Sports is seeking to lower expectations of a combined free-to-air and pay TV billion-dollar deal.
Fox Sports' new boss, Patrick Delany, and media rights negotiator Ian Frykberg have been visiting NRL clubs and while the feedback has been positive on Fox's need to develop a closer relationship, the clubs don't like the money talk.
Foxtel paid $658 million over five years for AFL in order to lift subscription rates in the southern and western states.
Fox Sports' rationale for not increasing significantly its $220 million over five years for almost the same number of NRL games is that Foxtel subscriptions in NSW and Queensland are already in line with their AFL expectations
http://www.smh.com.au/rugby-league/leag ... z1pJrtsU44
-
- Seniors
- Posts: 359
- Joined: Fri Feb 10, 2012 7:50 am
- Team: Newcastle Knights
- Location:
- Has thanked: 0
- Been liked: 0
Re: Foxtel considers Rugby League a downmarket product
Fox Sports and Nine paid $500 million for the current NRL rights and expect to win the 2013-17 rights.
In the rugby league cities of Sydney and Brisbane, Foxtel has the right to broadcast five of eight regular season NRL matches. However, Seven chief executive David Leckie has indicated that he would like to acquire at least one NRL game, and Network Ten has also expressed interest in snaring some rights.
Mr Freudenstein suggested Foxtel would push hard in its negotiations with the NRL.
"A lot of the value in any rights deal now will be driven by the subscription television sector.
"So we just need to make sure in any rights negotiation what we get is a fair share of the rights if they want us to pay them a fair share of the money."
http://www.theaustralian.com.au/medi...-1226303283565
In the rugby league cities of Sydney and Brisbane, Foxtel has the right to broadcast five of eight regular season NRL matches. However, Seven chief executive David Leckie has indicated that he would like to acquire at least one NRL game, and Network Ten has also expressed interest in snaring some rights.
Mr Freudenstein suggested Foxtel would push hard in its negotiations with the NRL.
"A lot of the value in any rights deal now will be driven by the subscription television sector.
"So we just need to make sure in any rights negotiation what we get is a fair share of the rights if they want us to pay them a fair share of the money."
http://www.theaustralian.com.au/medi...-1226303283565
- Beaussie
- Site Admin
- Posts: 9556
- Joined: Fri Nov 19, 2004 6:38 pm
- Team: Sydney Swans
- Location: Sydney
- Has thanked: 340 times
- Been liked: 74 times
Re: Foxtel considers Rugby League a downmarket product
Sunday NRL didn't even make the Top 20 broadcasts again this week. Channel 9 and Foxtel would be absolutely nuts to pay much more than they already pay for the NRL. Absoultely nuts I tell ya.
Down, down, NRL tv ratings are down.
Down, down, NRL tv ratings are down.
- Beaussie
- Site Admin
- Posts: 9556
- Joined: Fri Nov 19, 2004 6:38 pm
- Team: Sydney Swans
- Location: Sydney
- Has thanked: 340 times
- Been liked: 74 times
Re: Foxtel considers Rugby League a downmarket product
What rubbish. First we were told Channel 10 wanted every game. Now it's "some rights".justanotherleaguefan wrote:Fox Sports and Nine paid $500 million for the current NRL rights and expect to win the 2013-17 rights.
In the rugby league cities of Sydney and Brisbane, Foxtel has the right to broadcast five of eight regular season NRL matches. However, Seven chief executive David Leckie has indicated that he would like to acquire at least one NRL game, and Network Ten has also expressed interest in snaring some rights.
Mr Freudenstein suggested Foxtel would push hard in its negotiations with the NRL.
"A lot of the value in any rights deal now will be driven by the subscription television sector.
"So we just need to make sure in any rights negotiation what we get is a fair share of the rights if they want us to pay them a fair share of the money."
http://www.theaustralian.com.au/medi...-1226303283565

Oh and nevermind the fact that Fox is headed up by Lachlan Murdoch along with Channel 10 who are broke.
- Raiderdave
- Coach
- Posts: 16683
- Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2011 1:10 pm
- Team: Canberra
- Location:
- Has thanked: 0
- Been liked: 0
Re: Foxtel considers Rugby League a downmarket product
586,000 veiwers for 2 pretty average games on Sat nite on Fox
yeah... gee Fox would be dissapointed with that wouldn't they ?
they're doing hand stands ............
big dosh coming
big dosh :D
yeah... gee Fox would be dissapointed with that wouldn't they ?




they're doing hand stands ............

big dosh coming
big dosh :D
RL SOO II 4.194 Million veiwers
RL SOO I 4.068 Million
NRL GF 3.968 Million
VFL Grand Final 3.620 Million
SOO III 3.364 Million
NRL Prelim 2.219 Million
Kangaroos V NZ 1.214 Million
Sookerwhos V Japan 238K
RL SOO I 4.068 Million
NRL GF 3.968 Million
VFL Grand Final 3.620 Million
SOO III 3.364 Million
NRL Prelim 2.219 Million
Kangaroos V NZ 1.214 Million
Sookerwhos V Japan 238K

- Xman
- Coach
- Posts: 13919
- Joined: Wed Dec 28, 2011 7:09 pm
- Team: Essendon
- Location:
- Has thanked: 0
- Been liked: 0
Re: Foxtel considers Rugby League a downmarket product
Foxtel care about subscriptions, not ratings for individual showsRaiderdave wrote:586,000 veiwers for 2 pretty average games on Sat nite on Fox
yeah... gee Fox would be dissapointed with that wouldn't they ?![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
they're doing hand stands ............![]()
big dosh coming
big dosh :D
King-Eliagh: ...I believe [RL] is popular in all the other states and territories, bar tasmania.
- Raiderdave
- Coach
- Posts: 16683
- Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2011 1:10 pm
- Team: Canberra
- Location:
- Has thanked: 0
- Been liked: 0
Re: Foxtel considers Rugby League a downmarket product
they're going to get a lesson in what they should care about from the ARLC .... KXman wrote:Foxtel care about subscriptions, not ratings for individual showsRaiderdave wrote:586,000 veiwers for 2 pretty average games on Sat nite on Fox
yeah... gee Fox would be dissapointed with that wouldn't they ?![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
they're doing hand stands ............![]()
big dosh coming
big dosh :D

RL SOO II 4.194 Million veiwers
RL SOO I 4.068 Million
NRL GF 3.968 Million
VFL Grand Final 3.620 Million
SOO III 3.364 Million
NRL Prelim 2.219 Million
Kangaroos V NZ 1.214 Million
Sookerwhos V Japan 238K
RL SOO I 4.068 Million
NRL GF 3.968 Million
VFL Grand Final 3.620 Million
SOO III 3.364 Million
NRL Prelim 2.219 Million
Kangaroos V NZ 1.214 Million
Sookerwhos V Japan 238K

Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Ahrefs [Bot], Bing [Bot], Semrush [Bot] and 10 guests