NRL Fudged Membership Numbers

[NSWAFL]

"Prove the Leagues clubs include football memberships in their leagues clubs tally's "

Hello, imbecile! Look at what cooee said! There's your proof of that statement right there!

[cooee]

"Prove the Leagues clubs include football memberships in their leagues clubs tally's "

Hello, imbecile! Look at what cooee said! There's your proof of that statement right there!

HAHA Dunce. It was Football clubs were using leagues club memberships in there membership numbers.

[NSWAFL]

Double dunce! I was calling Dave out on an obvious faux pas!

[Raiderdave]

"Prove the Leagues clubs include football memberships in their leagues clubs tally's "

Hello, imbecile! Look at what cooee said! There's your proof of that statement right there!

HAHA Dunce. It was Football clubs were using leagues club memberships in there membership numbers.

exactly .. telling its football club members to join their Leagues club so as to add another form of support

no where
no where
does it say its the other way around

come on Fu.cktard
prove it

hurry up

[Raiderdave]

Double dunce! I was calling Dave out on an obvious faux pas!

what faux pas you moronic dimwitted *********** ?

[NSWAFL]

What faux pas???

Prove the Leagues clubs include football memberships in their leagues clubs tally's

You are a mixed up little boy, Dave! Get the question right if you want an answer!

[Raiderdave]

What faux pas???

Prove the Leagues clubs include football memberships in their club tally's

You are a mixed up little boy, Dave! Get the question right if you want an answer!

am I ?

[Raiderdave]

What faux pas???

Prove the Leagues clubs include football memberships in their clubs tally's

You are a mixed up little boy, Dave! Get the question right if you want an answer!

[Raiderdave]

What faux pas???

Prove the Leagues clubs include football memberships in their clubs tally's

You are a mixed up little boy, Dave! Get the question right if you want an answer!

[NSWAFL]

Aha! I found Topper's explanation! And it's also speculation the way I'm reading it;

viewtopic.php?f=8&t=2636&p=29363#p29303
(Third paragraph)

I have already stated my case about the Leagues Club situation in my signature. It's a part of their elaborate lie that is proven by the recorded instances of their altering crowd numbers at games. In addition, it is wedged in RL history that the clubs rely on the LC's for their revenue stream. That's their traditional community base since God knows when, and nothing has changed. Why do you think RL people got all upset and angry at the government cap threat on pokies? Because they knew that their sole revenue stream outside of the gates at games was under threat. If they had club memberships they wouldn't be so antsy. I think that's a perfectly reasonable view to hold on the evidence I have presented and therefore not defamatory.

I think that's enough to say, prove him wrong! And with more than just what you've already put because that as I have already said myself is suspect.

It's up to you lot to allay all suspicions.

[Raiderdave]

Aha! I found Topper's explanation! And it's also speculation the way I'm reading it;

viewtopic.php?f=8&t=2636&p=29363#p29303
(Third paragraph)

I have already stated my case about the Leagues Club situation in my signature. It's a part of their elaborate lie that is proven by the recorded instances of their altering crowd numbers at games. In addition, it is wedged in RL history that the clubs rely on the LC's for their revenue stream. That's their traditional community base since God knows when, and nothing has changed. Why do you think RL people got all upset and angry at the government cap threat on pokies? Because they knew that their sole revenue stream outside of the gates at games was under threat. If they had club memberships they wouldn't be so antsy. I think that's a perfectly reasonable view to hold on the evidence I have presented and therefore not defamatory.

I think that's enough to say, prove him wrong! And with more than just what you've already put because that as I have already said myself is suspect.

It's up to you lot to allay all suspicions.

he made the statement .. you repeated it
prove it
or it goes


or its on again
Xman...........you choose

[NSWAFL]

No, its now up to you to prove the speculation wrong. Speculation is fine, and that's what that is. Are you trying to deny that the Nine commentators didn't abuse the government for example? Are you trying to say that the Leagues Clubs have nothing whatsoever to do with the clubs themselves? That is fair comment there and you have no right to deny it without proving it wrong with evidence.

[cooee]

It's innocent till proven guilty not guilty till proven innocent.

[NSWAFL]

And I'm innocent (as is Topper) until proven guilty. So prove it.

[cooee]

You're the ones making the allegations.