Is the term "*******" unnacceptable for this board?
Re: Is the term "*******" unnacceptable for this board?
the poll isnt rigged. I dont even know how.
It may include occasional posters on this site, hence the greater numbers, but this is reasonable.
The decision stands.
It may include occasional posters on this site, hence the greater numbers, but this is reasonable.
The decision stands.
King-Eliagh: ...I believe [RL] is popular in all the other states and territories, bar tasmania.
- King-Eliagh
- Coach
- Posts: 12787
- Joined: Fri Nov 19, 2004 7:23 pm
- Team: Parramatta
- Location:
Re: Is the term "*******" unnacceptable for this board?
I noticed people incorrectly stated "********" was a "racist" term.NSWAFL wrote:So with that last bit in mind, let's see legal evidence that "native" is a racist term. Thanks, Cos! Well said!



xman wrote:KE, why is an even comp important?
- King-Eliagh
- Coach
- Posts: 12787
- Joined: Fri Nov 19, 2004 7:23 pm
- Team: Parramatta
- Location:
Re: Is the term "*******" unnacceptable for this board?
Apart from uneducated, you sir are a closet racist. Comon outta dat closet there cos and announce proudly to the world what you are. Xman, I expect you and NSWAFL to follow suit outta dat closet.cos789 wrote:Almost anything that references or distinguishes people is a racist term.NSWAFL wrote:So with that last bit in mind, let's see legal evidence that "native" is a racist term. Thanks, Cos! Well said!
But it is not a racial abuse term until used in a derogatory manner.
A "native" is a native of a country pure and simple.
"you're acting like a native" could be seen as a racist slur but observing that
some natives in a park appear to be drinking is not.
A word like "****" is unambiguously racial abuse since it referes to a group of people in a negative way.
Some words like "black" or "********" were borderline acceptable but are now clearly unacceptable.

xman wrote:KE, why is an even comp important?
- Raiderdave
- Coach
- Posts: 16683
- Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2011 1:10 pm
- Team: Canberra
- Location:
Re: Is the term "*******" unnacceptable for this board?
cos789 wrote:Almost anything that references or distinguishes people is a racist term.NSWAFL wrote:So with that last bit in mind, let's see legal evidence that "native" is a racist term. Thanks, Cos! Well said!
But it is not a racial abuse term until used in a derogatory manner.
A "native" is a native of a country pure and simple.
"you're acting like a native" could be seen as a racist slur but observing that
some natives in a park appear to be drinking is not.
A word like "****" is unambiguously racial abuse since it referes to a group of people in a negative way.
Some words like "black" or "********" were borderline acceptable but are now clearly unacceptable.
racist .........




RL SOO II 4.194 Million veiwers
RL SOO I 4.068 Million
NRL GF 3.968 Million
VFL Grand Final 3.620 Million
SOO III 3.364 Million
NRL Prelim 2.219 Million
Kangaroos V NZ 1.214 Million
Sookerwhos V Japan 238K
RL SOO I 4.068 Million
NRL GF 3.968 Million
VFL Grand Final 3.620 Million
SOO III 3.364 Million
NRL Prelim 2.219 Million
Kangaroos V NZ 1.214 Million
Sookerwhos V Japan 238K

- Raiderdave
- Coach
- Posts: 16683
- Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2011 1:10 pm
- Team: Canberra
- Location:
Re: Is the term "*******" unnacceptable for this board?
typical biasXman wrote:the poll isnt rigged. I dont even know how.
It may include occasional posters on this site, hence the greater numbers, but this is reasonable.
The decision stands.
disgraceful ...........seedy .. underhanded .. stench .. words to decribe anything to do boggerball & its fans




RL SOO II 4.194 Million veiwers
RL SOO I 4.068 Million
NRL GF 3.968 Million
VFL Grand Final 3.620 Million
SOO III 3.364 Million
NRL Prelim 2.219 Million
Kangaroos V NZ 1.214 Million
Sookerwhos V Japan 238K
RL SOO I 4.068 Million
NRL GF 3.968 Million
VFL Grand Final 3.620 Million
SOO III 3.364 Million
NRL Prelim 2.219 Million
Kangaroos V NZ 1.214 Million
Sookerwhos V Japan 238K

- King-Eliagh
- Coach
- Posts: 12787
- Joined: Fri Nov 19, 2004 7:23 pm
- Team: Parramatta
- Location:
Re: Is the term "*******" unnacceptable for this board?
cos789 wrote:Almost anything that references or distinguishes people is a racist term.NSWAFL wrote:So with that last bit in mind, let's see legal evidence that "native" is a racist term. Thanks, Cos! Well said!
But it is not a racial abuse term until used in a derogatory manner.
A "native" is a native of a country pure and simple.
"you're acting like a native" could be seen as a racist slur but observing that
some natives in a park appear to be drinking is not.
A word like "****" is unambiguously racial abuse since it referes to a group of people in a negative way.
Some words like "black" or "********" were borderline acceptable but are now clearly unacceptable.
This is not what AFL 'Warrior' said.
Cos lettuce = Racist


xman wrote:KE, why is an even comp important?
- King-Eliagh
- Coach
- Posts: 12787
- Joined: Fri Nov 19, 2004 7:23 pm
- Team: Parramatta
- Location:
Re: Is the term "*******" unnacceptable for this board?
A simple read between the lines says it all. The bias stench is vile and suffocating.Xman wrote:the poll isnt rigged. I dont even know how...but this is reasonable.
The decision stands.
Xman?......





xman wrote:KE, why is an even comp important?
Re: Is the term "*******" unnacceptable for this board?
I cant control which sides posters vote.King-Eliagh wrote:A simple read between the lines says it all. The bias stench is vile and suffocating.Xman wrote:the poll isnt rigged. I dont even know how...but this is reasonable.
The decision stands.
Xman?......![]()
![]()
![]()
If a heap of occasional RL fans voted the result may be the other way.
Fact is, of all the people who vote on the poll the far greater majority dont want the term used here.
Sorry guys. You may think its funny. The majority dont!
King-Eliagh: ...I believe [RL] is popular in all the other states and territories, bar tasmania.
- King-Eliagh
- Coach
- Posts: 12787
- Joined: Fri Nov 19, 2004 7:23 pm
- Team: Parramatta
- Location:
Re: Is the term "*******" unnacceptable for this board?
I dont find the term ******* funny. I'm just concerned about the process of polling going on here.

xman wrote:KE, why is an even comp important?
Re: Is the term "*******" unnacceptable for this board?
How would you suggest I control it?King-Eliagh wrote:I dont find the term ******* funny. I'm just concerned about the process of polling going on here.
King-Eliagh: ...I believe [RL] is popular in all the other states and territories, bar tasmania.
- King-Eliagh
- Coach
- Posts: 12787
- Joined: Fri Nov 19, 2004 7:23 pm
- Team: Parramatta
- Location:
Re: Is the term "*******" unnacceptable for this board?
And while im on this matter, lets speak once more about your moderating. As you suggested you would you are now welcome to delete AFL 'Warriors' racist post. It is within the recent thread "'AFL Warrior is back in sydney'". You should have clear details within the two reports I sent you so I find it strange you dont refer to these...

xman wrote:KE, why is an even comp important?
- King-Eliagh
- Coach
- Posts: 12787
- Joined: Fri Nov 19, 2004 7:23 pm
- Team: Parramatta
- Location:
Re: Is the term "*******" unnacceptable for this board?
I'd suggest as Raider suggests. That active members are involved in the process, so it is less easy for members to swamp the poll with 'ringins'. Those members can vote but it is awful strage. the other prob you'll have is members with several nicnames. This ones tougher but I know beaussie and mods can look into this.

xman wrote:KE, why is an even comp important?
Re: Is the term "*******" unnacceptable for this board?
I deleted the reports after investigating the issue and not finding it personally offensive and only slightly racial IMO.King-Eliagh wrote:And while im on this matter, lets speak once more about your moderating. As you suggested you would you are now welcome to delete AFL 'Warriors' racist post. It is within the recent thread "'AFL Warrior is back in sydney'". You should have clear details within the two reports I sent you so I find it strange you dont refer to these...
King-Eliagh: ...I believe [RL] is popular in all the other states and territories, bar tasmania.
Re: Is the term "*******" unnacceptable for this board?
Gotta say Im staggered you are fighting so hard just to use a term against me personally that I have said I find very offensive. It doesnt just target me, it targets all my kids, my wife, my family, my freinds, whether they are passionate AFL supporters or even hate the game.King-Eliagh wrote:And while im on this matter, lets speak once more about your moderating. As you suggested you would you are now welcome to delete AFL 'Warriors' racist post. It is within the recent thread "'AFL Warrior is back in sydney'". You should have clear details within the two reports I sent you so I find it strange you dont refer to these...
I find it disturbing you are so upset you are losing the right to be so abusive!
King-Eliagh: ...I believe [RL] is popular in all the other states and territories, bar tasmania.
- Raiderdave
- Coach
- Posts: 16683
- Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2011 1:10 pm
- Team: Canberra
- Location:
Re: Is the term "*******" unnacceptable for this board?
I don't think E has ever used the term , so you'd better retract that straight awayXman wrote:Gotta say Im staggered you are fighting so hard just to use a term against me personally that I have said I find very offensive. It doesnt just target me, it targets all my kids, my wife, my family, my freinds, whether they are passionate AFL supporters or even hate the game.King-Eliagh wrote:And while im on this matter, lets speak once more about your moderating. As you suggested you would you are now welcome to delete AFL 'Warriors' racist post. It is within the recent thread "'AFL Warrior is back in sydney'". You should have clear details within the two reports I sent you so I find it strange you dont refer to these...
I find it disturbing you are so upset you are losing the right to be so abusive!
its your methods , your abuse of power.. your obvious bias ... which concerns him & all of us
it would appear we've found another one not fit to moderate
to be a moderator
you must have a moderate approach to all posters ... not just to the AFL ones in here
you are flying in the face of the admins own veiw of this site
that it is NOT an AFL site .. it is a site for all followers of all codes
beaussie .... I think we need to chat




RL SOO II 4.194 Million veiwers
RL SOO I 4.068 Million
NRL GF 3.968 Million
VFL Grand Final 3.620 Million
SOO III 3.364 Million
NRL Prelim 2.219 Million
Kangaroos V NZ 1.214 Million
Sookerwhos V Japan 238K
RL SOO I 4.068 Million
NRL GF 3.968 Million
VFL Grand Final 3.620 Million
SOO III 3.364 Million
NRL Prelim 2.219 Million
Kangaroos V NZ 1.214 Million
Sookerwhos V Japan 238K
