Is the term "*******" unnacceptable for this board?

Xman · Post by **Xman** » Sun Jan 15, 2012 9:38 am

This result will determine if the term is officially banned on this board. Once the poll is over in 7 days the result will be reinforced.

Vote wisely.

Xman · Post by **Xman** » Sun Jan 15, 2012 9:49 am

Not looking good for the term *******.

Get your votes in while you can

Xman · Post by **Xman** » Sun Jan 15, 2012 11:50 am

Here's a bump for those who may miss the official poll.

NSWAFL · Post by **NSWAFL** » Sun Jan 15, 2012 1:10 pm

Another bump for the same purpose. Just helping out, Xman.

NSWAFL · Post by **NSWAFL** » Sun Jan 15, 2012 1:36 pm

And another bump

Xman · Post by **Xman** » Sun Jan 15, 2012 3:27 pm

11 - 5

"*******" looks like its a dead insult walking on TFC.

cos789 · Post by **cos789** » Sun Jan 15, 2012 5:22 pm

The word is a play on "******' which should be an automatic exclusion.
Just by the bye, it's better to frame questions in the affirmative rather than the double negative.

ParraEelsNRL · Post by **ParraEelsNRL** » Sun Jan 15, 2012 6:25 pm

I'll never stop calling you guys ********.

Never.

NSWAFL · Post by **NSWAFL** » Sun Jan 15, 2012 6:29 pm

Well once it's banned you won't have a choice!

ParraEelsNRL · Post by **ParraEelsNRL** » Sun Jan 15, 2012 6:35 pm

Well I noticed someone put my name up for the RL mod.

I'll say this, I'll do it as long as I and everyone else can refer to you blouses as ********

How's that eh, and you think we are stupid

ParraEelsNRL · Post by **ParraEelsNRL** » Sun Jan 15, 2012 6:36 pm

Some might even call that a low blow huh?

Xman · Post by **Xman** » Sun Jan 15, 2012 6:41 pm

ParraEelsNRL wrote:
Well I noticed someone put my name up for the RL mod.

I'll say this, I'll do it as long as I and everyone else can refer to you blouses as ********

How's that eh, and you think we are stupid

What a shame you won't take it on!

What the hell would you do as a mod anyway? Delete the mods that don't contain abuse?

ParraEelsNRL · Post by **ParraEelsNRL** » Sun Jan 15, 2012 6:45 pm

I'd let the blood run free and treat TFC as it should be treated.

It's a Zoo, thus it should be ran like a Zoo.

People would only get deleted or warned for obvious racism and sickening posts, the rest would be fair game.

ParraEelsNRL · Post by **ParraEelsNRL** » Sun Jan 15, 2012 6:47 pm

Sticks and stones make break my bones but ******** will never hurt me.

Xman · Post by **Xman** » Sun Jan 15, 2012 6:49 pm

ParraEelsNRL wrote:
I'd let the blood run free and treat TFC as it should be treated.

It's a Zoo, thus it should be ran like a Zoo.

People would only get deleted or warned for obvious racism and sickening posts, the rest would be fair game.

Well the voting so far suggests the majority do not want a LU style free for all where abuse takes precedent over debate.

I'd suggest with the numbers we've seen so far the motion should be carried tonight. Especially since the term seems to be used more than ever today.

Do you think there's likely to be more "no" votes?

Talking Footy

Talking Footy