Topper wrote:He'll soil his pants most likely, NSWAFL! Good one!
you'd be in to have a sniff of that too wouldn't ya




Topper wrote:He'll soil his pants most likely, NSWAFL! Good one!
prove it or lose it!Raiderdave wrote:ah noXman wrote:You're the only one crapping on about GWS being a tsunami.Raiderdave wrote:beaussie said they had less members then GWS which is incorrect .. thats the only reason I said anything
& anyway
its 3K ahead a tsunami xman
a tsunami
thats impressive
How anyone expects them to be even moderately popular for the first decade is beyond me.
flogball merkins jumping out of the woodwork to say as much ... as I've said .. maybe they should shut the F up as there'll be egg all ova their faces
& don't ask me how anyone could expect them to be anything but a train wreck ... yr sport is full of arrogant knobs .. start there maybe![]()
have alreadyXman wrote:prove it or lose it!Raiderdave wrote:ah noXman wrote:You're the only one crapping on about GWS being a tsunami.
How anyone expects them to be even moderately popular for the first decade is beyond me.
flogball merkins jumping out of the woodwork to say as much ... as I've said .. maybe they should shut the F up as there'll be egg all ova their faces
& don't ask me how anyone could expect them to be anything but a train wreck ... yr sport is full of arrogant knobs .. start there maybe![]()
I saw one from Dermott who never said the GWS would be a tsunami. Most of the article is paraphrasing by the Sydney media who just love code war articles.Raiderdave wrote:have alreadyXman wrote:prove it or lose it!Raiderdave wrote:ah no
flogball merkins jumping out of the woodwork to say as much ... as I've said .. maybe they should shut the F up as there'll be egg all ova their faces
& don't ask me how anyone could expect them to be anything but a train wreck ... yr sport is full of arrogant knobs .. start there maybe![]()
you asked for articles ... I posted them in another thread
end of story.
& dipperia ... diuppa ... dooper .... that guyXman wrote:I saw one from Dermott who never said the GWS would be a tsunami. Most of the article is paraphrasing by the Sydney media who just love code war articles.Raiderdave wrote:have alreadyXman wrote:prove it or lose it!
you asked for articles ... I posted them in another thread
end of story.
Any others?
Show us the dipper article, and the "plenty more"......Raiderdave wrote:& dipperia ... diuppa ... dooper .... that guyXman wrote:I saw one from Dermott who never said the GWS would be a tsunami. Most of the article is paraphrasing by the Sydney media who just love code war articles.Raiderdave wrote:have already
you asked for articles ... I posted them in another thread
end of story.
Any others?
theres plenty more ... but thats enough for me to say they're talking them up .......don't really care if its not enough for you.
the sydney media get their quotes from loud mouthed flogballers & theres no shortage of them
the code wars are being flamed by the loud mouthed goats from your code
not the Sydney media
Show us the dipper article, and the "plenty more"......Xman wrote:& dipperia ... diuppa ... dooper .... that guyRaiderdave wrote:I saw one from Dermott who never said the GWS would be a tsunami. Most of the article is paraphrasing by the Sydney media who just love code war articles.Xman wrote:have already
you asked for articles ... I posted them in another thread
end of story.
Any others?
theres plenty more ... but thats enough for me to say they're talking them up .......don't really care if its not enough for you.
the sydney media get their quotes from loud mouthed flogballers & theres no shortage of them
the code wars are being flamed by the loud mouthed goats from your code
not the Sydney media
an opinion ... is a statement peanut.NSWAFL wrote:Opinion proved you mean.
Lunch time!
yep ... thats what one does in a forumXman wrote:All you've proved Dave is that you can imbellish dermotss statement. He nev said they'd take over like a tsunami! He said they would have an impact significant enough for the NRl to take notice.
Post dippers comments again please.
Any others?
So far your statement is looking very very thin!
Ok, so far you have dippers comments as proof. Dermott never said or inferred a tsunami.Raiderdave wrote:yep ... thats what one does in a forumXman wrote:All you've proved Dave is that you can imbellish dermotss statement. He nev said they'd take over like a tsunami! He said they would have an impact significant enough for the NRl to take notice.
Post dippers comments again please.
Any others?
So far your statement is looking very very thin!
take it one step further to encourage debate ....
& no
I won't post it again ... I've done that once ... you find it
K