Mungoball

Post by **Beaussie** » Wed Jan 11, 2012 8:55 am

enarelle wrote:
Come on you guys only keep finding one rugger bugger at a time who despises League for pushing union into the background.

Huh, last time I looked Rugby Union owned you lot even in this country. Canberra a prime example.

Topper · Post by **Topper** » Wed Jan 11, 2012 8:57 am

Precisely, Beaussie.

Raiderdave · Post by **Raiderdave** » Wed Jan 11, 2012 9:20 am

Beaussie wrote:
enarelle wrote:
Come on you guys only keep finding one rugger bugger at a time who despises League for pushing union into the background.
Huh, last time I looked Rugby Union owned you lot even in this country. Canberra a prime example.

the insolvent brumbies ......

Judge J · Post by **Judge J** » Wed Jan 11, 2012 10:26 am

Can you prove this, Raider Dave?

Raiderdave · Post by **Raiderdave** » Wed Jan 11, 2012 10:39 am

Judge J wrote:
Can you prove this, Raider Dave?

provide the insolvent brumbies ?

well ...

.. they might be training today ... I'll see what they're doing this arvo
I'm ringing Andrew Fagan now

will that do your honour ?

Judge J · Post by **Judge J** » Wed Jan 11, 2012 10:53 am

No it will not. You need visible written evidence of their insolvency.

Raiderdave · Post by **Raiderdave** » Wed Jan 11, 2012 11:09 am

Judge J wrote:
No it will not. You need visible written evidence of their insolvency.

I object

Xman · Post by **Xman** » Wed Jan 11, 2012 11:11 am

Raiderdave wrote:
Judge J wrote:
No it will not. You need visible written evidence of their insolvency.
I object

You object to backing any of your statements up with proof.

What a surprise!

Raiderdave · Post by **Raiderdave** » Wed Jan 11, 2012 11:20 am

Xman wrote:
Raiderdave wrote:
Judge J wrote:
No it will not. You need visible written evidence of their insolvency.
I object
You object to backing any of your statements up with proof.

What a surprise!

sustained

Judge J · Post by **Judge J** » Wed Jan 11, 2012 12:35 pm

Raiderdave wrote:
Judge J wrote:
No it will not. You need visible written evidence of their insolvency.
I object

On what grounds?

Xman · Post by **Xman** » Wed Jan 11, 2012 12:43 pm

Judge J wrote:
Raiderdave wrote:
Judge J wrote:
No it will not. You need visible written evidence of their insolvency.
I object
On what grounds?

Blatant stupidity

Raiderdave · Post by **Raiderdave** » Wed Jan 11, 2012 1:07 pm

Xman wrote:
Judge J wrote:
Raiderdave wrote:
I object
On what grounds?
Blatant stupidity

I objected .... not you

Judge J · Post by **Judge J** » Wed Jan 11, 2012 1:39 pm

Xman, I was asking Raider Dave for the grounds for his objection. His last complaint is justified.

So Raider Dave, what are the grounds for your objection to my statement?

Raiderdave · Post by **Raiderdave** » Wed Jan 11, 2012 2:12 pm

Judge J wrote:
Xman, I was asking Raider Dave for the grounds for his objection. His last complaint is justified.

So Raider Dave, what are the grounds for your objection to my statement?

yeah ... keep outta this Xman

on the grounds that I was to provide CEO of said penniless Brumbies
more then enough evidence one would of thought your honour

Judge J · Post by **Judge J** » Wed Jan 11, 2012 4:07 pm

Overruled. That is not written evidence. Heresay is not permissable.

Talking Footy

Talking Footy

Mungoball

Re: Mungoball

Re: Mungoball

Re: Mungoball

Re: Mungoball

Re: Mungoball

Re: Mungoball

Re: Mungoball

Re: Mungoball

Re: Mungoball

Re: Mungoball

Re: Mungoball

Re: Mungoball

Re: Mungoball

Re: Mungoball

Re: Mungoball

Who is online