a post written by a giggleball pud puller 5 years ago is your proof ?Beaussie wrote:As Daniel Green has pointed out regarding tv ratings for the AFL and NRL.
The above figures, of course, only take into account the capital cities, with Oztam ratings - being the currency by which television programs are bought and sold - only measuring the capitals. Most of the Rugby League persuassion would argue that the NRL has a far greater representation in the regional areas than the AFL. This is undoubtably true, with the decentralized states of NSW and Queensland encompassing large regional areas of Rugby League loving folk. But is this regional area, which, in Television terms makes up approximately 30% of the market, enough to claw back the 25 million viewer deficit (and a deficit in viewing time of 115 million hours?) Not by a long way.
http://www.talkingfooty.com/tv_ratings_2011.php

he says
. But is this regional area, which, in Television terms makes up approximately 30% of the market, enough to claw back the 25 million viewer deficit (and a deficit in viewing time of 115 million hours?) Not by a long way
but fails to put up the actual regional figures from that year to prove his point

he just says .. they don't
without any figures to back up his claim ..... what a w@nker



theres no dispute
Rugby League whopped AFL in 2011, as they did in 2010 & 2009
whopped em good
