Can the NRL match the AFL?

[King-Eliagh]

Oh my god. This is senseless. You clearly do not have a good understanding of the most appropriate definition of culture, which is the anthropological version I put forward. Otherwise you would recognise I was illustrating the complexity of culture. Instead you resort to gibbering on trying to sound as though you know what you are on about and referring to a law you have heard of. You are a lost blind kitten. Being disabled does not mean one is of a disability culture. In fact I'm quite certain people who have a disability would take offence to such a term. It is no different than for example if I had a lisp then I would have a lisp culture. Absolutely ridiculous. Now can you refer to this term "disability culture" which you seem to suggest is written into law? I very much doubt it exists. Shock me if you can topper

[ParraEelsNRL]

Wah wah wah, the little fumbleballer got his feelings hurt.

LOL.

Eat some concrete and harden the F%ck up sweetheart.

[Topper]

Oh my god. This is senseless. You clearly do not have a good understanding of the most appropriate definition of culture, which is the anthropological version I put forward. Otherwise you would recognise I was illustrating the complexity of culture. Instead you resort to gibbering on trying to sound as though you know what you are on about and referring to a law you have heard of. You are a lost blind kitten. Being disabled does not mean one is of a disability culture. In fact I'm quite certain people who have a disability would take offence to such a term. It is no different than for example if I had a lisp then I would have a lisp culture. Absolutely ridiculous. Now can you refer to this term "disability culture" which you seem to suggest is written into law? I very much doubt it exists. Shock me if you can topper

Now you're being delusional. Are you suggesting that those with the same disability or condition shouldn't pool their resources for the betterment of those who have the condition or disability? How much can one person with the condition do on their own? Not much. But if they were part of a group more can be done. The differences across the spectrum of disability mean that individual needs require special tactics, thought patterns and the like. These belief structures coming from one source (disability in general) create a culture of assistance and understanding. By denying such a culture exists, you deny an entire section of the community their rights to seek a better way of life despite their respective conditions. The law plays a crucial role by defining "disability" thereby showing the sorts of conditions and diseases that are covered by this structure.

[ParraEelsNRL]

What would you know about a disability that you can teach everyone else?

[King-Eliagh]

Oh my god. This is senseless. You clearly do not have a good understanding of the most appropriate definition of culture, which is the anthropological version I put forward. Otherwise you would recognise I was illustrating the complexity of culture. Instead you resort to gibbering on trying to sound as though you know what you are on about and referring to a law you have heard of. You are a lost blind kitten. Being disabled does not mean one is of a disability culture. In fact I'm quite certain people who have a disability would take offence to such a term. It is no different than for example if I had a lisp then I would have a lisp culture. Absolutely ridiculous. Now can you refer to this term "disability culture" which you seem to suggest is written into law? I very much doubt it exists. Shock me if you can topper

Now you're being delusional. Are you suggesting that those with the same disability or condition shouldn't pool their resources for the betterment of those who have the condition or disability? How much can one person with the condition do on their own? Not much. But if they were part of a group more can be done. The differences across the spectrum of disability mean that individual needs require special tactics, thought patterns and the like. These belief structures coming from one source (disability in general) create a culture of assistance and understanding. By denying such a culture exists, you deny an entire section of the community their rights to seek a better way of life despite their respective conditions. The law plays a crucial role by defining "disability" thereby showing the sorts of conditions and diseases that are covered by this structure.

Topper me boy you're not quite getting the point and are weasling your way out of this quite well. However the point stands and this is what I originally stated, disability and culture just dont go together. Sure we've all heard of rap culture etc etc but you have implied there is something called disability culture and there simply aint. not in law not anywhere and the term is not PC in any way as people with a disability do not like to be seen from the point of their disability but would prefer to be seen by their abilities, which is why this stupid term you put together will never exist. You have put a decent argument together above and from my ivory tower i can see you are trying but fundamentally you sir are a bumbling bobbly gobbldigook speaking know it all and I hope you have the spine to agree and tell us all that no disability culture is not appropriate.

[Topper]

I hope you have the spine to admit that you don't know what you are talking about, King-Eliagh. Given that you have provided nothing new other than insults I see no need to comment further.

Eels fan, anyone can teach about disability better than King-Eliagh.

[King-Eliagh]

Oh I know exactly what I'm talking about. It comes from years of research. Perhaps you could try reading a little of Clifforg Geertz and Max Weber to touch up on your knowledge of culture Topper? They have a long standing debate which has contributed considerably to the definition of the term. Then perhaps you might understand. In the mean time I'm still waiting on a reference to 'disability culture' in your silly law books or anywhere else on this planet ... ... ...

My insults are fair, accurate and intended to teach you a lesson, now learn it phlegm brain

[ParraEelsNRL]

Typical vico sook, no wonder they play and follow the soft option.

[Topper]

Insults never teach anything, King-Eliagh. If there wasn't a disability culture, there wouldn't be disability law nor would there be a UN declaration on rights for the disabled.

[ParraEelsNRL]

Oh look, the sook is still going on.

[Topper]

You're the one who's sooking if that's all you can say about it. =D>

[King-Eliagh]

Lawyers and those who make law are not the people we should be referring to when trying to understand culture Topper. The notion of culture is the centre of the study of anthropology. Have you looked up my references yet topper me lad?

[Topper]

I have no need. The lawmakers recognise the culture exists, and that's why the law exists to begin with.