AFL & NRL Footy TV Ratings - 2024

[azif]

dddooooooddddjjjjaaaayyyyyyy

[Fred]

I think most were expecting a ratings spike given the added spike from both Brisbane and Sydney - non traditional markets - which draws an extra audience than say two Melbourne teams who were going to watch no matter who was playing. It’s not rocket science.

any ratings spike was well & truly put to bed by the pathetic contest when 2/3 of the game was rubbish
even sookie said he expected it would have a significant adverse affect on the figures
then the fairy tale writers got involved .... no wonder the ratings didn't come out til 7.30pm

Are you sure you’re not Donald Trump ?? Lol

[azif]

I think most were expecting a ratings spike given the added spike from both Brisbane and Sydney - non traditional markets - which draws an extra audience than say two Melbourne teams who were going to watch no matter who was playing. It’s not rocket science.

any ratings spike was well & truly put to bed by the pathetic contest when 2/3 of the game was rubbish
even sookie said he expected it would have a significant adverse affect on the figures
then the fairy tale writers got involved .... no wonder the ratings didn't come out til 7.30pm

Are you sure you’re not Donald Trump ?? Lol

when it doesn't add up... it doesn't add up

[WookieReturns]

FInals TV Ratings

[WookieReturns]

[azif]

nice graph

30 million behind the NRL
deal with it

[WookieReturns]

nice graph

30 million behind the NRL
deal with it

Only in average ratings, which NRL fans fervently seem to believe is all that matters.

i want to point out that the ratings that league holds to be sacrosanct - when it suits them - are based on a survey of 12,000 people.
The graph is based on interviews with 50,000-65,000 people.

[azif]

nice graph

30 million behind the NRL
deal with it

Only in average ratings, which NRL fans fervently seem to believe is all that matters.

i want to point out that the ratings that league holds to be sacrosanct - when it suits them - are based on a survey of 12,000 people.
The graph is based on interviews with 50,000-65,000 people.

deluded biased fumbling spa^^stic

50 to 65K from the ta*rd sthn states probably
irrelevant ofc
just change it if you don't like it eh ? ..... fumblers to a tee

[azif]

wow
those fumbling women are setting new records eh
records for......... low ..... TV ratings



not even on the list & the lowest was 28,000

NRL women last week... 260,000

https://tvtonight.com.au/2024/10/wednes ... -2024.html

[azif]

But im sure sookie will create another graph showing they're about the same

[WookieReturns]

But im sure sookie will create another graph showing they're about the same

You know i dont create the data right? Cant help that you have such a narrow mind

[WookieReturns]

deluded biased fumbling spa^^stic

50 to 65K from the ta*rd sthn states probably
irrelevant ofc
just change it if you don't like it eh ? ..... fumblers to a tee

More bullshit without evidence

tv ratings are a survey of fucking 12,000 people and you fervently believe in an average derived from that.

[azif]

But im sure sookie will create another graph showing they're about the same

You know i dont create the data right? Cant help that you have such a narrow mind

but but but

[azif]

deluded biased fumbling spa^^stic

50 to 65K from the ta*rd sthn states probably
irrelevant ofc
just change it if you don't like it eh ? ..... fumblers to a tee

More bullshit without evidence

tv ratings are a survey of fucking 12,000 people and you fervently believe in an average derived from that.

but but but
couldn't get a bogus chart up quick enough so fumblers weren't as suicidal about the growing gap in the number of eyeballs between the most watched sport & their fumbling abortion

[WookieReturns]

sure I mean it had nothing to do with roy morgan giving me a 10 year data dump recently.

Next week im getting a 20 year one. Im sure you'll bitch and moan about that.