New ARLC Chairman

[Terry]

Don't deflect .just show where as you have claimed that the last few deals they were applying for bank loans .( excluding the loans in 2017)
Don't waffle on with shit .
Just post where .
That link does not back up your claim l.
One bank was concerned .
2 others were ok with lending l
That is not KNOCKED BACK .doesnt even say they applied
Try again .

Ffs you know that got rejected twice so they went begging to their broadcast partners for an advance!

You know this and still on denial about the whole saga and get triggered about this

Still living in the past pal???? Sad really!!! Got any new material?? You're like a broken down old comedian who tells the same jokes night after night and can't work out why no one is laughing lololololol!!!!!!

What about da loan? Da loan? It's da loan I tells ya lolololololol!!!!!!!!!!!!

[notaleaguefan]

Oh dear . So you can't post where they went for loans on other tv deals as you claimed
Lol
Caught out lying once again

Ffs you know they went for loans as it’s been covered many tines before twice they were knocked back!
First time for 50 million! Second time for 30 million then had to go begging groveling to the broadcast holders for an advance to pay running costs

[AFLcrap1]

Here we go again .a claim was made
I asked for proof .
I clearly stated that the 2017 loans are agreed they are not the issue .
Now the deflecting begins.repeated posts about 2017
That's not the issue

So
Stop posting about the 2 loans in 2017 .
Show where previous tv deals they had to go for loans as you claimed .
It's simple .
Just post it

Re: New ARLC Chairman
Report Quote Quote Liked!
Post by notaleaguefan » Sat Oct 19, 2019 3:06 am

Like the start of every new broadcast deal!
The nrlol makes a profit, it gets smaller then goes in to negative! Then the league is forced to apply for a bank loan and gets rejected!

Like that has been the case on the past few occasions

[NRL&NFLweLaughATafl]

He will be good for the NRL. The code needs someone with a sports business head like him.
Some of the guys they have had in the same position in past have been pretty useless.

[notaleaguefan]

Here we go again .a claim was made
I asked for proof .
I clearly stated that the 2017 loans are agreed they are not the issue .
Now the deflecting begins.repeated posts about 2017
That's not the issue

So
Stop posting about the 2 loans in 2017 .
Show where previous tv deals they had to go for loans as you claimed .
It's simple .
Just post it

Re: New ARLC Chairman
Report Quote Quote Liked!
Post by notaleaguefan » Sat Oct 19, 2019 3:06 am

Like the start of every new broadcast deal!
The nrlol makes a profit, it gets smaller then goes in to negative! Then the league is forced to apply for a bank loan and gets rejected!

Like that has been the case on the past few occasions

https://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/sport ... 94843a1dc3

See idiot this is why we keen going around and around in loops as keen doing this until people move on and you then beat your chest thinking you have won the argument

[AFLcrap1]

I win the argument because of 2 things .
A..you lie.
B.you can't back up the lies with any proof .

[Fred]

Oh dear . So you can't post where they went for loans on other tv deals as you claimed
Lol
Caught out lying once again

Ffs you know they went for loans as it’s been covered many tines before twice they were knocked back!
First time for 50 million! Second time for 30 million then had to go begging groveling to the broadcast holders for an advance to pay running costs

You know you have to fit in with crappers definition and parameters ... he narrows it done so far it’s impossible to prove anything. Just like only media outlets he approves of are legitimate .... unless they are pro nrl articles.

I’m still marvelling at him storing your posts lol.