A 1/4 of NRL players consider a switch to AFL

Onions · Post by **Onions** » Wed Aug 03, 2011 12:30 pm

Hey you fucking idiot there are only three players on the bench at one fucking time! You do the fucking math if you can!

Raiderdave · Post by **Raiderdave** » Wed Aug 03, 2011 12:33 pm

Onions wrote:
Hey you ******* idiot there are only three players on the bench at one ******* time! You do the ******* math if you can!

hey you ?

who
me

who you

who

him

>

:_<>

:_<>

I mean what in gods name are you talking about
the number on the bench doesn't affect the number of interchanges

:_<>

:_<>

Onions · Post by **Onions** » Wed Aug 03, 2011 12:34 pm

It fucking restricts the amount of time a player sits on the fucking bench, dunderhead!!

Raiderdave · Post by **Raiderdave** » Wed Aug 03, 2011 12:38 pm

Onions wrote:
It ******* restricts the amount of time a player sits on the ******* bench, dunderhead!!

we have 4 then on ours
& are limited to 10 interchanges between the 17 players over 80 minutes

you have 3... & on average 100 interchanges between your 21 players
over 120 minutes

so tell me
based on that who's getting less time on the field ?

Onions · Post by **Onions** » Wed Aug 03, 2011 12:42 pm

NRL players because the game's only 80 fucking minutes!

Raiderdave · Post by **Raiderdave** » Wed Aug 03, 2011 1:02 pm

Onions wrote:
NRL players because the game's only 80 ******* minutes!

ahhh...

:_<>

oh good lord

:_<>

Onions · Post by **Onions** » Wed Aug 03, 2011 1:34 pm

No fucking reply? LOSER!

Raiderdave · Post by **Raiderdave** » Wed Aug 03, 2011 1:40 pm

Onions wrote:
No ******* reply? LOSER!

show me your method
on how you came to the conclusion , that 21 players playing for 120 minutes with 100 interchanges

spent more time on the field then

17 players .. playing for 80 minutes & restricted to 10 interchanges

thats some pretty fancy math there

:_<>

Onions · Post by **Onions** » Wed Aug 03, 2011 1:47 pm

80 minutes is fucking less than 120 minutes!!!

You call that fancy math? I'm calling the fucking white coats on you, crazy kid!

Raiderdave · Post by **Raiderdave** » Wed Aug 03, 2011 1:52 pm

Onions wrote:
80 minutes is ******* less than 120 minutes!!!

You call that fancy math? I'm calling the ******* white coats on you, crazy kid!

ah

& 100 interchanges is more then 10

I mean
what crazy F.ucked up maths do they teach in that backward little state hanging out of Australias bumhole like a sh.it dag ?

MarkZZZ · Post by **MarkZZZ** » Wed Aug 03, 2011 7:24 pm

I will have to admit I have rarely watched a full game of AFL (too boring mostly) but I have watched enough over the years to see that there is a lot of times I see players that are not involved in play who are pretty much just standing around or trotting up and down at a leisurely pace in the anticipation that the ball may come their way.

If I where to accept that they move around it still does not take into consideration the sheer physicality that the NRL players need to play the game compared to that which is required for the AFL player. It's like comparing a thoroughbred racehorse to a kids show pony.

Truthsayer · Post by **Truthsayer** » Wed Aug 03, 2011 7:41 pm

It has been some time since the game was like that, Mr Mark. On many occasions most players are in the half of the ground where the ball is and are either trying to get away from their opponent or trying to stay with their opponent. It is not a good idea to stop because of the nature of the game and how it can change in a moment several times over. Your analogy of the racehorse against the show pony is bordering on ridiculous. If we must speak of horses, perhaps you should substitute the show pony for the draught horse. Then perhaps you would be much closer to the correct analogy. The draught horse is NRL. The racehorse is the AFL.

Post by **Beaussie** » Wed Aug 03, 2011 9:07 pm

Raiderdave wrote:
Onions wrote:
**** off the both of you! Beaussie got it right! AFL players are much fitter than NRL players because they do a lot more ******* running! And Gary Ablett Senior would shatter Hindmarsh into a million ******* pieces! As would many others in the history of the great ******* game of Aussie Rules Football!!
NRL players are bulit for power
they have the physiques of sprinters .. powerfully built to run fast over shorter distances .. & carry heavier frames to asborb multiple impacts

Hahaha, you're serious too aren't you?

Raiderdave · Post by **Raiderdave** » Thu Aug 04, 2011 8:23 am

Beaussie wrote:
Raiderdave wrote:
Onions wrote:
**** off the both of you! Beaussie got it right! AFL players are much fitter than NRL players because they do a lot more ******* running! And Gary Ablett Senior would shatter Hindmarsh into a million ******* pieces! As would many others in the history of the great ******* game of Aussie Rules Football!!
NRL players are bulit for power
they have the physiques of sprinters .. powerfully built to run fast over shorter distances .. & carry heavier frames to asborb multiple impacts
Hahaha, you're serious too aren't you?

he weighs 112kgs
& can run 100m in 13 secs .. & can bench 140kgs

yeah ... I'm serious
he would snap most AFL players in half

Post by **Beaussie** » Thu Aug 04, 2011 8:57 am

Raiderdave wrote:
Beaussie wrote:
Raiderdave wrote:
NRL players are bulit for power
they have the physiques of sprinters .. powerfully built to run fast over shorter distances .. & carry heavier frames to asborb multiple impacts
Hahaha, you're serious too aren't you?

he weighs 112kgs
& can run 100m in 13 secs .. & can bench 140kgs

yeah ... I'm serious
he would snap most AFL players in half

Hahaha, that fat fuck would struggle to get off the bench and away from his Big Macs.

Talking Footy

Talking Footy

A 1/4 of NRL players consider a switch to AFL