AFLcrap1 wrote:once again for the terminally stupid .
They played at the highest level .
**** the highest paid .
Lauded by media coaches etc ..
To me That's successful .
When this fumble reject can get maybe 2 of the. Above we could call him moderately successful .
But I can't see it happening
It was a hypothetical question big guy calm down, I've conceded that were both great off field success stories for the AFL generating millions in revenue and free advertising, it was a great point you raised and I whole heartedly agree with you as I've previously stated.
Ok so here's the question for you again, if I could write it slowly I would but here goes, how many games would Nat Fyfe have to play at NRL level for you to consider him to have had a successful career? I didn't ask for your opinion on if he would make it at NRL level I don't care, I'm trying to ascertain what the figure is you have in mind for future reference.
Of course none of this takes away from the fact that both league internationals were monumental on field failures, not the the AFL cared the money was in the bank as you keep pointing out.