2018 - NRL - Rugby League TV Ratings

[leeroy*NRL*]

excuses starting early....

Was the NRL's Monday game shown on FTA?

why do you say excuses starting early...

Its without a doubt the codes will be lower because of the Com Games..

(and no Mondays game between Parra v Tigers was a FOX Exclusive Game..)

if it had been on FTA would of rated around 800k I would say.

which mean you're lucky. The AFL rated over 1m

Easter Monday in AFL has build a following in mebourne >> hawks v Cats.

Tigers v Parra have been doing it for like 4 years only and has always been on FOX>

[pussycat]

Thur -Metro = 300k, Reg. = 207, PTV = 173

Tot. 680

Fri.
Cron v East 216k

Sts v Souths Metro (195, 11, 79, 0, 6) - = 291

Reg, 197

STV 216

Tot = 704k

[NlolRL]

Havent we already got a thread for this?

[Beaussie]

[AFLcrap1]

Fri night ..a win for RL

This year is going to be an absolute slaughter

[Terry]

As expected there has been a drop off in ratings due to the Comm games. And strangely enough the poor 'ol fumblers have had a bigger drop off than RL. Shocking numbers for Coll V Carl to continue the poor start to the year.

[NlolRL]

Hardly surprising given it was shown on 7 mate nationally. Melbourne didnt get over 200k which must be the first time ever, especially for two large Melbourne clubs

[Terry]

Hardly surprising given it was shown on 7 mate nationally. Melbourne didnt get over 200k which must be the first time ever, especially for two large Melbourne clubs

Yeah, I agree. Woeful stuff for the Australian Fumbling League. If this trend continues it'll be the worst ratings week for the fumblers ever.

And it's pretty sad those poor cognitively challenged southern hicks don't know how to change channels lololoololololoololol. Poor silly buggers.

[AFLcrap1]

That excuse is getting old
Secondary digital channels have been around for a decade .
I know they're slow down south .....but Jesus if it takes you 10 years to learn how to press a button on the remote you really are dumber than dog shit .

[Terry]

Yeah true. And probably some of the smarter hicks are sick of getting the fumbling mess jammed down their throats & are watching the more precise, skilled sports on offer at the Comm games.

[NlolRL]

That excuse is getting old
Secondary digital channels have been around for a decade .
I know they're slow down south .....but Jesus if it takes you 10 years to learn how to press a button on the remote you really are dumber than dog shit .

Whether its an old excuse or not, figures dont lie. Ratings for secondary channels are almost always well below the main channels

[pussycat]

Hardly surprising given it was shown on 7 mate nationally. Melbourne didnt get over 200k which must be the first time ever, especially for two large Melbourne clubs

But, But, But, But you are hilarious

[pussycat]

That excuse is getting old
Secondary digital channels have been around for a decade .
I know they're slow down south .....but Jesus if it takes you 10 years to learn how to press a button on the remote you really are dumber than dog shit .

Whether its an old excuse or not, figures dont lie. Ratings for secondary channels are almost always well below the main channels

That may be the case LOL's ,but did you bring that up when C9 were televising the WCC overseas or when they covered the Olympic/Comm. Games But, But, But, But. But But But, But, But, But, But, But, But, But, But, But. But But But, But, But, .

Mmh , I wonder why? - Try having a look at programing

[pussycat]

Wookie , Everyone knows that Collingwood and Carleton are two of the most supported clubs in the AFL. And cherry picking the results to get the AFL desired results shows how desperate you bubble dwellers are.

[NlolRL]

Wookie , Everyone knows that Collingwood and Carleton are two of the most supported clubs in the AFL. And cherry picking the results to get the AFL desired results shows how desperate you bubble dwellers are.

Whats this cherry picking youre talking about? He explained why sime games rate less