2018 - NRL - Rugby League TV Ratings

[NlolRL]

So suddenly it's your opinion .

Thanks for that .
Your opinion is worthless .

So there is nothing zilch ..etc to say that the AFL took less money for concurrent games .

& that was the basis of your argument when I had you cornered earlier in this thread .

So thank you

According to your theories Rl got te better deal .

I may not have proof from the AFL or the networks but it doesnt take Einstein to figure out the Networks would pay more for exclusive games

[AFLcrap1]

So still no proof

Thank you
Come again

[pussycat]

How many games do bottom 4 nrl sides get on friday night?

Stop with your excuses. Your best games are usually friday night and they get beaten

AFL: worst 4 = 0
NRL: worst 4 = 11matchews

ok, lets put this ridiculous excuse to rest once and for all.

I've averaged the final ladder positions (from last year) for all the teams playing Thursday night games for the NRL this year and the average is 7.17, so clearly slanted to the higher end of the ladder. Nothing new here.

The Friday average is even higher at 6.86

The AFL's Friday average is 7.21

So in actual fact, despite Pussy's constant whinging that the AFL taget Friday with higher performing teams, it's the NRL who are doing this to a greater degree on both Thursday, and especially Friday

Suck on that Pussy

Your Ladder theory is a load of crap , just like all your other theorys.

And you didn't even have any games on Friday night. So that's just more of your crap.

On our games that went head to head on Friday arvo, Souths and Canterbury were 11 and 12 so how would your theory work there?

LOL's theory 101

[NlolRL]

It isn't a theory, it's an evaluation of how both codes have scheduled their match ups on Friday nights. It shows, on average, the NRL have match ups between better performing teams than the AFL, despite your bleating about how the AFL don't show their 4 worst teams.

Individual rounds have nothing to do with it because the evaluation shows trends.

So your Friday excuse is busted. Maybe it's time to find another

[Terry]

It isn't a theory, it's an evaluation of how both codes have scheduled their match ups on Friday nights. It shows, on average, the NRL have match ups between better performing teams than the AFL, despite your bleating about how the AFL don't show their 4 worst teams.

Individual rounds have nothing to do with it because the evaluation shows trends.

So your Friday excuse is busted. Maybe it's time to find another

Pal, just give up these mad theories. They're usless, hopeless, good for nothing whining, squealing excuses why the Australian Fumbling League get smashed every year, I repeat every year, by the good 'ol girl RL!!!!

All you need to do is count the raw numbers. Add them up. Game by game, week by week, month by month. Then at the end of the year you look at the totals........and voila!!!!!! RL wins again.

It's just like companies do at the end of the financial year my friend. They don't look at hand picked comparisons, they look at the performance over the whole year. That's how you do it.

Now release yourself from your contorted theories and whining excuses pal. It's no good for you or anyone else.

Alas & alak......I suspect you will soon be diving head first back into the goldfish bowl for a few more meaningless laps!!!! Stroke, stroke, stroke lolololololololol!!!!!!!

[NlolRL]

Thanks again PT

[pussycat]

WORST TEAMS in regards to ratings! Its certainly not Collingwood, who even I know are the most supported club in the AFL ahead of teams like Carlton and Essendon. These theories/trends/gobbledegook , whatever you want to call them are a joke. They don't take into account in anyway 22% of your teams are ignored when it comes to the major timeslots.

You don't want to look at the full picture all 200+ matches, you know how that plays out. You only want to cherry pick through the matches and pick out the ones that best suit you. The ones with the poor rating sides missing. Victory for the AFL no matter how lame

[NlolRL]

WORST TEAMS in regards to ratings! Its certainly not Collingwood, who even I know are the most supported club in the AFL ahead of teams like Carlton and Essendon. These theories/trends/gobbledegook , whatever you want to call them are a joke. They don't take into account in anyway 22% of your teams are ignored when it comes to the major timeslots.

and your claim that the worst 4 teams are excluded doesnt take into account that the NRL only give these teams a single game or two at max, and for the rest of their Friday night games they play their best teams again and again. This is why we won last year's single v single games 35-4, even your best match ups get beaten by our.

Your excuse is busted buster

[NlolRL]

You don't want to look at the full picture all 200+ matches, you know how that plays out. You only want to cherry pick through the matches and pick out the ones that best suit you. The ones with the poor rating sides missing. Victory for the AFL no matter how lame

when all but about 50 of our games are shown at the same time as another AFL game, yet counted by you flogs as the same as your isolated games, you bloody bet I dont want to consider them the same. It's like me bragging about getting more ratings on Saturday when NRL isnt on FTA. I dont do that because I know the comparison is poor. Yet you guys seem to have no issue claiming we have the same conditions for 200+ games. It's BS

[Terry]

Looks like we're on track for stellar ratings this week when compared to last Easter. Anyone know how the fumblers are travelling? They've got some average to poor Fox ratings for a lot of their games.

[Beaussie]

[pussycat]

Looks like we're on track for stellar ratings this week when compared to last Easter. Anyone know how the fumblers are travelling? They've got some average to poor Fox ratings for a lot of their games.

Most of them seem to have given up. Counting there ratings may be a problem.

Maybe LOL's theory's though hold the key to the AFL's success

[Terry]

Yep. The old, crankiest man in the world Wookie, was at least good for up to date TV ratings numbers. Looks like he's run off to the jungle with all the other hang outs. Probably a good decision lolololololololololololol.

From what I can see RL have fantastic ratings this round. Not sure about the fumblers......but geez they've had some low rating fox games. Anyone know the totals for both codes???

[pussycat]

Yep. The old, crankiest man in the world Wookie, was at least good for up to date TV ratings numbers. Looks like he's run off to the jungle with all the other hang outs. Probably a good decision lolololololololololololol.

From what I can see RL have fantastic ratings this round. Not sure about the fumblers......but geez they've had some low rating fox games. Anyone know the totals for both codes???

No regionals or gem published on Sunday but they should get at least 250k . Giving us just under 4.4m for the round and giving us a 4.1m average after 4 rounds. Looks like another gold medal year.




And despite what Wookie is saying everything but our metro numbers are up! Probably even our crowds.

[leeroy*NRL*]

be interesting to see around SOO this year, with the weekend match

how much ratings and crowds take a hit