Roy Morgan poll shows AFL GF slaughters NRL GF for viewers

[leagueiscrap]

It's not just the question my friend. It also depends on who commissions the poll - there could be an agenda involved. And most importantly in this case who and how many people did they "snap SMS". They claim they got answers from around 1,600 ppl but how many did they actually SMS? 10,000, 20,000, 30,000? I mean who actually replies to a 'snap SMS survey'?

Too many variables my friend to take seriously.

If they interviewed 30k people it’s still 25k more than rating boxes that you fruit loops hinge your life around

[Terry]

It's not just the question my friend. It also depends on who commissions the poll - there could be an agenda involved. And most importantly in this case who and how many people did they "snap SMS". They claim they got answers from around 1,600 ppl but how many did they actually SMS? 10,000, 20,000, 30,000? I mean who actually replies to a 'snap SMS survey'?

Too many variables my friend to take seriously.

If they interviewed 30k people it’s still 25k more than rating boxes that you fruit loops hinge your life around

As strange as this may sound link......you missed my point entirely Lolololololololololololol. You've probably had a hard day chasing sabre tooth tigers and sharpening spears. Lololololololol.

[Terry]

And by the way fumblers: I've been waiting for some of you to comment on the Ratings Wookie posted. But nothing. You must be somewhat deflated I spose.

[NlolRL]

It's not just the question my friend. It also depends on who commissions the poll - there could be an agenda involved. And most importantly in this case who and how many people did they "snap SMS". They claim they got answers from around 1,600 ppl but how many did they actually SMS? 10,000, 20,000, 30,000? I mean who actually replies to a 'snap SMS survey'?

Too many variables my friend to take seriously.

I can see why you dont take it seriously

They received 44% responses saying they watched the AFL

[Terry]

It's not just the question my friend. It also depends on who commissions the poll - there could be an agenda involved. And most importantly in this case who and how many people did they "snap SMS". They claim they got answers from around 1,600 ppl but how many did they actually SMS? 10,000, 20,000, 30,000? I mean who actually replies to a 'snap SMS survey'?

Too many variables my friend to take seriously.

I can see why you dont take it seriously

They received 44% responses saying they watched the AFL

That's not actually correct. I would suggest the biggest response they got was no reply to the 'snap SMS'. That's part of the problem. Who could be bothered to answer and why?

[pussycat]

http://www.roymorgan.com/findings/7362- ... 1710032246

A Roy Morgan Snap SMS survey taken on Sunday showed 8.4 million Australians aged 18+ (44.5%) watched the AFL Grand Final much higher than suggested by the official Channel 7 ‘5 City Metro’ ratings of 2.7 million.

A further Roy Morgan Snap SMS survey taken on Monday showed 6.5 million Australians aged 18+ (34.5%) watched the NRL Grand Final again much higher than suggested by the official Channel 9 ‘5 City Metro’ ratings of 2.3 million.

“The different time slots for the games also skewed the method used to watch the games. The Saturday afternoon ‘timeslot’ of the AFL Grand Final drew bigger audiences at pubs and hotels and watching at friend’s houses compared to the NRL Grand Final held in the evening.

“Streaming the Saturday afternoon AFL Grand Final via an app or website was more likely for Metro area viewers (81,000) than those in the rest of Australia (18,000). The situation was reversed for the night-time NRL decider with more rural and regional viewers (57,000) of the NRL Grand Final streaming via an app or website compared to their ‘5 City Metro’ area counterparts (37,000).

“Interestingly, despite the larger audience of the AFL Grand Final than the NRL Grand Final – this difference was entirely a result of larger audiences in Australia’s five largest ‘Capital Cities’. There was little difference in the total viewers in the rest of Australia between the two matches with Roy Morgan showing the NRL Grand Final had a higher number of TV viewers outside the ‘5 City Metro’ area than the AFL Grand Final.”

“Interestingly, despite the larger audience of the AFL Grand Final than the NRL Grand Final – this difference was entirely a result of larger audiences in Australia’s five largest ‘Capital Cities’. There was little difference in the total viewers in the rest of Australia between the two matches with Roy Morgan showing the NRL Grand Final had a higher number of TV viewers outside the ‘5 City Metro’ area than the AFL Grand Final.” So what did the survey tell us?

[NlolRL]

http://www.roymorgan.com/findings/7362- ... 1710032246

A Roy Morgan Snap SMS survey taken on Sunday showed 8.4 million Australians aged 18+ (44.5%) watched the AFL Grand Final much higher than suggested by the official Channel 7 ‘5 City Metro’ ratings of 2.7 million.

A further Roy Morgan Snap SMS survey taken on Monday showed 6.5 million Australians aged 18+ (34.5%) watched the NRL Grand Final again much higher than suggested by the official Channel 9 ‘5 City Metro’ ratings of 2.3 million.

“The different time slots for the games also skewed the method used to watch the games. The Saturday afternoon ‘timeslot’ of the AFL Grand Final drew bigger audiences at pubs and hotels and watching at friend’s houses compared to the NRL Grand Final held in the evening.

“Streaming the Saturday afternoon AFL Grand Final via an app or website was more likely for Metro area viewers (81,000) than those in the rest of Australia (18,000). The situation was reversed for the night-time NRL decider with more rural and regional viewers (57,000) of the NRL Grand Final streaming via an app or website compared to their ‘5 City Metro’ area counterparts (37,000).

“Interestingly, despite the larger audience of the AFL Grand Final than the NRL Grand Final – this difference was entirely a result of larger audiences in Australia’s five largest ‘Capital Cities’. There was little difference in the total viewers in the rest of Australia between the two matches with Roy Morgan showing the NRL Grand Final had a higher number of TV viewers outside the ‘5 City Metro’ area than the AFL Grand Final.”

“Interestingly, despite the larger audience of the AFL Grand Final than the NRL Grand Final – this difference was entirely a result of larger audiences in Australia’s five largest ‘Capital Cities’. There was little difference in the total viewers in the rest of Australia between the two matches with Roy Morgan showing the NRL Grand Final had a higher number of TV viewers outside the ‘5 City Metro’ area than the AFL Grand Final.” So what did the survey tell us?

err more people watched the AFL and a greater proportion were in cities

[AFLcrap1]

It's not just the question my friend. It also depends on who commissions the poll - there could be an agenda involved. And most importantly in this case who and how many people did they "snap SMS". They claim they got answers from around 1,600 ppl but how many did they actually SMS? 10,000, 20,000, 30,000? I mean who actually replies to a 'snap SMS survey'?

Too many variables my friend to take seriously.

If they interviewed 30k people it’s still 25k more than rating boxes that you fruit loops hinge your life around

Jesus h fuck
This nutter takes stupidity to new levels

Terry posts they got answers from about 1600
This nutter then starts talking about 30,000

There we have it folks
The dumbest post of the day

[pussycat]

Not the cities - the 5 cities (metro). When he surveyed all of Australia eg. Wollongong, Newcastle. Canberra, Illawarra etc. He found pretty much what Oztam found.. There was very little difference.

[NlolRL]

Not the cities - the 5 cities (metro). When he surveyed all of Australia eg. Wollongong, Newcastle. Canberra, Illawarra etc. He found pretty much what Oztam found.. There was very little difference.

wrong. He said the AFL smashed it in the cities, but the regional markets were better for the NRL
“Interestingly, despite the larger audience of the AFL Grand Final than the NRL Grand Final – this difference was entirely a result of larger audiences in Australia’s five largest ‘Capital Cities’. There was little difference in the total viewers in the rest of Australia between the two matches with Roy Morgan showing the NRL Grand Final had a higher number of TV viewers outside the ‘5 City Metro’ area than the AFL Grand Final.”

[AFLcrap1]

Lol
Roy Morgan

[pussycat]

Not the cities - the 5 cities (metro). When he surveyed all of Australia eg. Wollongong, Newcastle. Canberra, Illawarra etc. He found pretty much what Oztam found.. There was very little difference.

wrong. He said the AFL smashed it in the cities, but the regional markets were better for the NRL
“Interestingly, despite the larger audience of the AFL Grand Final than the NRL Grand Final – this difference was entirely a result of larger audiences in Australia’s five largest ‘Capital Cities’. There was little difference in the total viewers in the rest of Australia between the two matches with Roy Morgan showing the NRL Grand Final had a higher number of TV viewers outside the ‘5 City Metro’ area than the AFL Grand Final.”

So your back to cherry picking the results . Typical of you fumblers only want to include the 5 capital cities not all Australia.


If your going to post something at least be aware of what it says!


“Interestingly, despite the larger audience of the AFL Grand Final than the NRL Grand Final – this difference was entirely a result of larger audiences in Australia’s five largest ‘Capital Cities’

[NlolRL]

Not the cities - the 5 cities (metro). When he surveyed all of Australia eg. Wollongong, Newcastle. Canberra, Illawarra etc. He found pretty much what Oztam found.. There was very little difference.

wrong. He said the AFL smashed it in the cities, but the regional markets were better for the NRL
“Interestingly, despite the larger audience of the AFL Grand Final than the NRL Grand Final – this difference was entirely a result of larger audiences in Australia’s five largest ‘Capital Cities’. There was little difference in the total viewers in the rest of Australia between the two matches with Roy Morgan showing the NRL Grand Final had a higher number of TV viewers outside the ‘5 City Metro’ area than the AFL Grand Final.”

So your back to cherry picking the results . Typical of you fumblers only want to include the 5 capital cities not all Australia.


If your going to post something at least be aware of what it says!


“Interestingly, despite the larger audience of the AFL Grand Final than the NRL Grand Final – this difference was entirely a result of larger audiences in Australia’s five largest ‘Capital Cities’

Wtf are you on about. The total favours the AFL which is primarily due to larger metro audiences. The total still allowed for regional audiences idiot

[leeroy*NRL*]

LOL LOL

POLLS I WILL NEVER BELIEVE POLLS

LET ALONE A TXT SURVEY

ANYONE REMEMBER TRUMP

EVERY POLL RATED HIM A 10% CHANCE

[NlolRL]

LOL LOL

POLLS I WILL NEVER BELIEVE POLLS

LET ALONE A TXT SURVEY

ANYONE REMEMBER TRUMP

EVERY POLL RATED HIM A 10% CHANCE

Tv Ratings are basically polls