Re: 2017 - AFL / AFLW - Australian Football TV Ratings

[NlolRL]

But but but
Caught out again
Can't wait to highlight the storms ratings in MELB .
Then crow about the Swans ratings in all of NSW ...regional ...metro & STV .

show me where I compared them directly fuckwit

[AFLcrap1]

Easy
In this post .


Re: 2017 - Australian Football TV Ratings - AFL, AFL Womens etc (Rolling updates in OP)
Report this post Quote
Post by NlolRL » Sat Jul 01, 2017 12:55 pm

Fri TV #NRL #NRLBroncosStorm Nine 409k (Syd 211k Bri 198k)
Fri STV #NRL #FoxLeague #NRLBroncosStorm National 260k: Metro 175k (Syd 84k Mel 30k Bri 54k Ade 2k Per 5k)
Plus around 60k for gem, plus around 313k for regionals (est) = 1.04m

Fri TV #AFL #AFLDeesSwans Seven 419k (Mel 311k Ade 108k) 7mate 187k (Syd 76k Bri 25k Per 85k)
Fri STV #AFL #FoxFooty #AFLDeesSwans National 306k: Metro 246k (Syd 50k Mel 113k Bri 17kAde 36k Per 30k)
Plus around 200k for regionals (est) = 1.11m

Both games were one-sided. NRL was 1st v 3rd, AFL was 6th v 10th. NRL involved their biggest club who are 3rd, AFL involved one of their smaller clubs who are 6th.

That's 14 v 4 in the one v one game comparison. Bring on the but but buts


You then went in to spruik the whole of NSW ratings for AFL
Yet when it come to the NRL only talked about IN MELB .

Sad sad sad pathetic attempt .

1 point for trying.

[NlolRL]

Easy
In this post .


Re: 2017 - Australian Football TV Ratings - AFL, AFL Womens etc (Rolling updates in OP)
Report this post Quote
Post by NlolRL » Sat Jul 01, 2017 12:55 pm

Fri TV #NRL #NRLBroncosStorm Nine 409k (Syd 211k Bri 198k)
Fri STV #NRL #FoxLeague #NRLBroncosStorm National 260k: Metro 175k (Syd 84k Mel 30k Bri 54k Ade 2k Per 5k)
Plus around 60k for gem, plus around 313k for regionals (est) = 1.04m

Fri TV #AFL #AFLDeesSwans Seven 419k (Mel 311k Ade 108k) 7mate 187k (Syd 76k Bri 25k Per 85k)
Fri STV #AFL #FoxFooty #AFLDeesSwans National 306k: Metro 246k (Syd 50k Mel 113k Bri 17kAde 36k Per 30k)
Plus around 200k for regionals (est) = 1.11m

Both games were one-sided. NRL was 1st v 3rd, AFL was 6th v 10th. NRL involved their biggest club who are 3rd, AFL involved one of their smaller clubs who are 6th.

That's 14 v 4 in the one v one game comparison. Bring on the but but buts


You then went in to spruik the whole of NSW ratings for AFL
Yet when it come to the NRL only talked about IN MELB .

Sad sad sad pathetic attempt .

1 point for trying.

haha, you're such a moron. That's TOTAL national ratings, something I compare every week.

I mentioned the poor FTA ratings for the Storm in Melbourne, and in the same post, but a different point, quoted the Swans total ratings in NSW, but I never compared one to the other.

Idiot

[SportFan]

I've always seen it as obvious...

When you have a code like the AFL, who are older (VFL), more iconic - the ball, the moments & most of all NOT HAVING NRL PRESENCE IN TWO MAJOR STATES...

There's no competition.

NRL will continue to be daylight 2nd.

[AFLcrap1]

I've always seen it as obvious...

When you have a code like the AFL, who are older (VFL), more iconic - the ball, the moments & most of all NOT HAVING NRL PRESENCE IN TWO MAJOR STATES...

There's no competition.

NRL will continue to be daylight 2nd.

Really
What fantasy land do you live in ?
More people watch RL in Aust each year than watch AFL .
Spin it how you want to make you feel better .
It doesn't change that fact .

& your brainwashed ravings are your opinion
The BALL
the moments
Jesus Christ you cultists are on a different planet .

[AFLcrap1]

Easy
In this post .


Re: 2017 - Australian Football TV Ratings - AFL, AFL Womens etc (Rolling updates in OP)
Report this post Quote
Post by NlolRL » Sat Jul 01, 2017 12:55 pm

Fri TV #NRL #NRLBroncosStorm Nine 409k (Syd 211k Bri 198k)
Fri STV #NRL #FoxLeague #NRLBroncosStorm National 260k: Metro 175k (Syd 84k Mel 30k Bri 54k Ade 2k Per 5k)
Plus around 60k for gem, plus around 313k for regionals (est) = 1.04m

Fri TV #AFL #AFLDeesSwans Seven 419k (Mel 311k Ade 108k) 7mate 187k (Syd 76k Bri 25k Per 85k)
Fri STV #AFL #FoxFooty #AFLDeesSwans National 306k: Metro 246k (Syd 50k Mel 113k Bri 17kAde 36k Per 30k)
Plus around 200k for regionals (est) = 1.11m

Both games were one-sided. NRL was 1st v 3rd, AFL was 6th v 10th. NRL involved their biggest club who are 3rd, AFL involved one of their smaller clubs who are 6th.

That's 14 v 4 in the one v one game comparison. Bring on the but but buts


You then went in to spruik the whole of NSW ratings for AFL
Yet when it come to the NRL only talked about IN MELB .

Sad sad sad pathetic attempt .

1 point for trying.

haha, you're such a moron. That's TOTAL national ratings, something I compare every week.

I mentioned the poor FTA ratings for the Storm in Melbourne, and in the same post, but a different point, quoted the Swans total ratings in NSW, but I never compared one to the other.

Idiot

Lol you posted both lots of ratings ...comparing the games
A few posts later you post the WHOLe NSw ratings for fumbles ....even quoted STV & Regional .
Yet you didn't do the same for the storm .
You only quoted MELB FTA figures

Now why would a dishonest bullshitting fumbler do that

So of course you are making a comparison .
One sided ..not a fair comparison ..but what we expect from most fumblers on here .
& very laughable from our local fruiterer who loves the apples v apples mantra when it suits
Apparently it didn't suit you this time .

[NlolRL]

Lol you posted both lots of ratings ...comparing the games
A few posts later you post the WHOLe NSw ratings for fumbles ....even quoted STV & Regional .
Yet you didn't do the same for the storm .
You only quoted MELB FTA figures

Now why would a dishonest bullshitting fumbler do that

So of course you are making a comparison .
One sided ..not a fair comparison ..but what we expect from most fumblers on here .
& very laughable from our local fruiterer who loves the apples v apples mantra when it suits
Apparently it didn't suit you this time .

I compared the total national ratings because I had the figures. I never directly compared NSW total to Melbourne FTA despite what your pea brain tells you. I never said "ooohhh looks 34k v 190k". Them's the facts, and anyone with half a brain cell can tell exactly what I posted and meant.

[AFLcrap1]

So I imagined your comments about the storms ratings .
Lol
You're not very good at this
Especially when I can requote your posts

[NlolRL]

quote where I directly compared the storm's FTA ratings in Melbourne to the Swans total ratings in NSW...............

[AFLcrap1]

Re read what you posted .

[NlolRL]

Re read what you posted .

I know exactly what I posted and why. My post had 2 points, to comment on Melbourne's FTA ratings for the storm, and quote a tweet that had appeared about the swans total ratings in NSW. They were never mentioned as a direct comparison, and were never intended to be.

But it's classical you though, ignore the facts of the post and make your own BS interpretation up

[AFLcrap1]

Lol
You go to the trouble of finding Regional & STv ratings for the swans for all of NSW
After having a rant comparing the games
Yet you couldn't post the same reg or STv ratings for the STORM .
Only posted the MELB FTA ratings
Lol
Pathetic .
It's clear as day what you did .

[NlolRL]

Lol
You go to the trouble of finding Regional & STv ratings for the swans for all of NSW
After having a rant comparing the games
Yet you couldn't post the same reg or STv ratings for the STORM .
Only posted the MELB FTA ratings
Lol
Pathetic .
It's clear as day what you did .

I copied and pasted a tweet, hardly an effort.

If you think its as clear as day youre having a bad day

[AFLcrap1]

Lol
Sure you did .
Go out of your way to post ALL THE NSW RATINGS for Fumbles
Only post the MELB FTA ratings for the NRL
Lol no agenda there ..
Can see through your bullshit ...like I usually do .

[NlolRL]

The swans ratings were conveniently posted on one tweet on twitter. The storm ratings were not