Rugby Leagues quickest too fast for AFL.

[Fred]

You are currently converting speed units from kilometers per hour to second per 100 meters
36 kph = 10 sec/hm
kilometers per hour Open kilometers per hour information in new window
kph
exchange units
GO
second per 100 meters Open second per 100 meters information in new window
10 sec/hm
Conversion base : 1 kph = 360 sec/hm Conversion base : 1 sec/hm = 360 kph



Seems i was right.

[Fred]

No i have not lol. I gather it is not hard... lets see... off the top of my head.... 36 kph would be 36 klm every 60 minutes. Hmmm so we may have to turn klm into metres im gathering... is that 36000 metres and minutes into seconds ... is that 3600 seconds in an hour? So from there i think it would be maybe working that down to 1 metre. So what we do to one side we do to the other so 3600 divided by 36000 but that doesnt seem right although is rounded. Then obviously times by 100. I am guessing i am wrong or there is an easier way lol. My head hurts now....

not a clue!



Anything else we should know about you Freddie?

Please feel free to educate me. I am always up for learning and growing. But i did a check as you can see and it gave the same results. Now, if like me you just skip through the posts and throw most comnents in as a passing interest thats cool. I probably wouldnt have read my post either lol..... i mean ... seriously lol. But if you did read it, and it was just off the top of my head...and there is an error.. who knows i may have put it down wrong, but i ended up with the same as the conversion table i went to. I was more interested if i had worked it out right lol surprised myself but thought my reasoning was just but hey... that is just me thinking it through ...i am sure there is a much similer formula.

Anyway all good.

[King-Eliagh]

Check out 10.81 Harry Cunningham from the Swans and its only a heat.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=Qg_4etCXwLg

Thanks for your late contribution beaussie. But, well..., I'm afraid I gotta be honest wit you bro... it's actually completely fuckin useless. It contributes nuttin as, as the thread title tells us "rugby leagues quickest are" way too fast for this chump! :_<>

Way too quick and I've provided ample evidence which proves this.

Beaussie I'm happy for you to use your admin privileges, delete your post and give yourself a four day banning for contributing such a useless post at such a late time in the debate.
You've let your AFL members down here beaussie. You really let em down

[King-Eliagh]

You are currently converting speed units from kilometers per hour to second per 100 meters
36 kph = 10 sec/hm
kilometers per hour Open kilometers per hour information in new window
kph
exchange units
GO
second per 100 meters Open second per 100 meters information in new window
10 sec/hm
Conversion base : 1 kph = 360 sec/hm Conversion base : 1 sec/hm = 360 kph



Seems i was right.

Jesus Christ! You really need some mathematical knowledge Freddie me stalker. And as per usual I'm happy to provide you with the knowledge you so dearly need. I'm happy to do that and a big clue I'll give you free of charge is that Nic nats high speed 36km is NOT, I repeat NOT HIS AVERAGE SPEED :_<> you silly silly stalker you!

Now I can help you more Freddie, I can give you even more knowledge that you simply don't have BUT, you must now bow down and admit it, admit that rugby leagues quickest are too quick for AFL. If you wanta mya knowledge..ah then Admit it!

Also I do look kindly on those who admit I'm the giver of wisdom and knowledge round these parts. Admit that too and I'll teach you a lil more life lessons as well as ur standard literacy and numeracy and other educational needs

Yours sincerely,

KING

[Fred]

So my maths were right lol


And we still do not have a sub 11 for roberts.

[King-Eliagh]

So my maths were right lol


And we still do not have a sub 11 for roberts.

Ahh my stalker no. Your maths was absolutely fundamentally wrong.

[Fred]

Maths isn't your strong point KE I gather.

[King-Eliagh]

Maths isn't your strong point KE I gather.

as I said you're trying to determine nic nats 100metre time going solely off his top speed. You do know this is absolutely and fundamentally impossible don't you? It's mathematically incorrect.

Keep trying tho Freddie me stalker, it's funny to watch

[Fred]

No. Your wrong.

[King-Eliagh]

No. Your wrong.

And here we have, recorded for prosperity the precise moment Freddie reverts to a child

Utterly out smarted, completely out played for nigh on ten pages.

I feel for ya Freddie but turning your brain into the emotional and intellectual status of a six year old has been necessary. The truth is harsh for you here Freddie, but sometimes thats just the way it is.

It is so apt, so sososososo apt that you've reverted to six year old debating with a nic nat argument

Thanks Freddie, it's been a wonderful insight into the ignorance of an AFL fan you've given us.

Thanks me clown many a chuckle. My work here is done. I know, it's gunna be tough for me to leave this thread. It's brought many laughs. But Unless someone can come in with an argument intelligent enough to actually challenge the data, the times and the professional analysis of Matt shirvington that I've provided then I'm gunna have to say adios feeling comfy with my absolute domination.

Rugby league quickest - too fast for the AFL.

As proven by...moi.

[Fred]

No. Dont think so.