dominating on the field but no one cares

Which is the best football code? Here you can have it out with other football fans.
User avatar
post_hoc
Coach
Coach
Reactions:
Posts: 2256
Joined: Fri Oct 17, 2014 1:09 pm
Team: Western Sydney Wanderers
Location:

Re: dominating on the field but no one cares

Post by post_hoc »

Swans4ever wrote:
post_hoc wrote:
GWS Membership by end of season 15,311, over 2 cities, with go knows how many non ticket members and there most successful season to date

Wanderers 16845, memberships been open a little more than 1 month, and still 6 weeks before the start of the season.

Playing out of the same ground as well. I hope we get the GWS attendance counter we will end up with 30,000 every game.
Well that's super.....the question isn't why are the WSW this successful it's why aren't they more?? 3 mil pop in WS, main migrants who come from countries where soccer is their 1st language yet only 16k. Why not 100k members and sell outs week in and week out at ANZ after all it only holds 84k with relatively little in the way of competition- yet Melb Victory has twice members, crowd revenue - me thinks your boasting is really highlighting the fact they should in reality be doing much better!!! AF in this part of Syd is as foreign as icebergs in the Sahara dessert!!!!
Rather simple, unlike the AFL who count members who have written an email to the club, the Wanderers membership consists of season ticket holders. The home ground for their entire existence had a capacity of 20,000 plus change, of which we had to reserve 15,000 or more for away fans (league rules) and reserve some for walk ups. so we could have a maximum of 16500. So how can we sell more memberships than we have seats?

oh thats right, we can sell pet memberships like your mob, so how could we sell more memberships bright spark
Football in NSW
- Football 200,868
- AFL NSW/ACT 28,468
- Rugby League 96,041
- Rugby Union 40,685
Football has 22% more players than the other football codes combined
AFLcrap1
Coach
Coach
Reactions:
Posts: 18893
Joined: Wed Oct 30, 2013 9:49 am
Team: The Scottish Puffins
Location:

Re: dominating on the field but no one cares

Post by AFLcrap1 »

Swans4ever wrote:
AFLcrap1 wrote:
Swans4ever wrote:
AFLcrap1 wrote:
Stop fucking deflecting .
I never said RL is the biggest sport anywhere ...that's just another deflection .


You stated that RL is losing ground to the midgets .
I asked how .
What do you do .
Go on a big deflective rant .

Stay on topic dickhead & try to debate your bullshit claims .
I better watch out he's most probable stamping his feet and going red in the face going " it's wyies it's wyies!" I did stay in topic....you went off topic....now your deflecting and yes your a tool!
So you post some bullshit
When asked for something to back it up
It's the usual off topic rant
Why post when you won't discuss anything you claim .

Your just clogging up thread after thread
Now stay on topic
& show where RL is losing ground to the midgets
Come on you can do it .
You must have something to show why you made that claim
Every thread has your usual BS your a hypocrite and a cockhead!
Lol off topic again .
Simple question
You claimed that RL is losing ground to the midgets .
I've asked 3 or 4 times for you to show where
You can't ....
Lol only bullshit I post is when I requote what you post .

Now do you think you can answer without deflecting
Where is some proof of RL losing ground .
TLPG 🤣liar extraordinaire
You should thank me for publishing your IP

and I never published any actual IP. That's it.
🤣
I was a mod at the time .
Xman wrote
I also gave them to TLPG believing he was still a mod.I admit I made a mistake.
:^o :^o
Fred
Coach
Coach
Reactions:
Posts: 10143
Joined: Mon Dec 05, 2011 9:13 am
Team: Collingwood
Location: Gold Coast

Re: dominating on the field but no one cares

Post by Fred »

post_hoc wrote:
Swans4ever wrote:
post_hoc wrote:
GWS Membership by end of season 15,311, over 2 cities, with go knows how many non ticket members and there most successful season to date

Wanderers 16845, memberships been open a little more than 1 month, and still 6 weeks before the start of the season.

Playing out of the same ground as well. I hope we get the GWS attendance counter we will end up with 30,000 every game.
Well that's super.....the question isn't why are the WSW this successful it's why aren't they more?? 3 mil pop in WS, main migrants who come from countries where soccer is their 1st language yet only 16k. Why not 100k members and sell outs week in and week out at ANZ after all it only holds 84k with relatively little in the way of competition- yet Melb Victory has twice members, crowd revenue - me thinks your boasting is really highlighting the fact they should in reality be doing much better!!! AF in this part of Syd is as foreign as icebergs in the Sahara dessert!!!!
Rather simple, unlike the AFL who count members who have written an email to the club, the Wanderers membership consists of season ticket holders. The home ground for their entire existence had a capacity of 20,000 plus change, of which we had to reserve 15,000 or more for away fans (league rules) and reserve some for walk ups. so we could have a maximum of 16500. So how can we sell more memberships than we have seats?

oh thats right, we can sell pet memberships like your mob, so how could we sell more memberships bright spark
Can i now go on for the next seven pages asking for proof of memberships being given for writing an email..?
Veni, vidi, vici
Fred
Coach
Coach
Reactions:
Posts: 10143
Joined: Mon Dec 05, 2011 9:13 am
Team: Collingwood
Location: Gold Coast

Re: dominating on the field but no one cares

Post by Fred »

Or where pet memberships are counted in official statistics lol. We could clog up the whole forum with me persuing this across threads ... even starting a new thread to persue............ but i want .....
Veni, vidi, vici
AFLcrap1
Coach
Coach
Reactions:
Posts: 18893
Joined: Wed Oct 30, 2013 9:49 am
Team: The Scottish Puffins
Location:

Re: dominating on the field but no one cares

Post by AFLcrap1 »

Fred wrote:
Or where pet memberships are counted in official statistics lol. We could clog up the whole forum with me persuing this across threads ... even starting a new thread to persue............ but i want .....
Lol
I have no problems for anyone asking for some proof of a claim .
The fact that threads are derailed because people won't post anything but rants or deflections seems to be the major problem on here .

It's not hard
Claim something then have something to back it up
TLPG 🤣liar extraordinaire
You should thank me for publishing your IP

and I never published any actual IP. That's it.
🤣
I was a mod at the time .
Xman wrote
I also gave them to TLPG believing he was still a mod.I admit I made a mistake.
:^o :^o
User avatar
leagueiscrap
Banned
Reactions:
Posts: 7862
Joined: Sat May 10, 2014 11:08 am
Team: Essendon
Location:

Re: dominating on the field but no one cares

Post by leagueiscrap »

post_hoc wrote:
Swans4ever wrote:
post_hoc wrote:
GWS Membership by end of season 15,311, over 2 cities, with go knows how many non ticket members and there most successful season to date

Wanderers 16845, memberships been open a little more than 1 month, and still 6 weeks before the start of the season.

Playing out of the same ground as well. I hope we get the GWS attendance counter we will end up with 30,000 every game.
Well that's super.....the question isn't why are the WSW this successful it's why aren't they more?? 3 mil pop in WS, main migrants who come from countries where soccer is their 1st language yet only 16k. Why not 100k members and sell outs week in and week out at ANZ after all it only holds 84k with relatively little in the way of competition- yet Melb Victory has twice members, crowd revenue - me thinks your boasting is really highlighting the fact they should in reality be doing much better!!! AF in this part of Syd is as foreign as icebergs in the Sahara dessert!!!!
Rather simple, unlike the AFL who count members who have written an email to the club, the Wanderers membership consists of season ticket holders. The home ground for their entire existence had a capacity of 20,000 plus change, of which we had to reserve 15,000 or more for away fans (league rules) and reserve some for walk ups. so we could have a maximum of 16500. So how can we sell more memberships than we have seats?

oh thats right, we can sell pet memberships like your mob, so how could we sell more memberships bright spark
lol your a jealous flog arent you? all the AFL's clubs revenue & financial statements are available to read. in the AFL's annual report it even lists the break down of the memberships! the little a league & NRLOL do not do this & the majority of clubs from both codes do not release their annual reports to the public

you pretty much summed up the popularity of the wanderers with your comment about the migrants. if the wanderers hadnt been so successful since their firs inception they would be nowhere near as popular. give it a few years of being on the bottom end of the ladder then see how their fans stick up
Australian sporting sponsorship
AFL excess of $50m
A league $30 million plus
ARU $27 million
NRLOL $25 million

Leagueiscrap
and she still changes your nappies as well!
pusseycat replys
Only when I have an accident.
User avatar
leagueiscrap
Banned
Reactions:
Posts: 7862
Joined: Sat May 10, 2014 11:08 am
Team: Essendon
Location:

Re: dominating on the field but no one cares

Post by leagueiscrap »

Fred wrote:
Or where pet memberships are counted in official statistics lol. We could clog up the whole forum with me persuing this across threads ... even starting a new thread to persue............ but i want .....
the membership numbers and revenue & the break down of the memberships are listed in the clubs and AFL's annual reports.
their claim about pet memberships is BS just because the NRLOL add theirs to boost their pathetic numbers
http://www.smh.com.au/rugby-league/leag ... 2fohp.html
Australian sporting sponsorship
AFL excess of $50m
A league $30 million plus
ARU $27 million
NRLOL $25 million

Leagueiscrap
and she still changes your nappies as well!
pusseycat replys
Only when I have an accident.
User avatar
post_hoc
Coach
Coach
Reactions:
Posts: 2256
Joined: Fri Oct 17, 2014 1:09 pm
Team: Western Sydney Wanderers
Location:

Re: dominating on the field but no one cares

Post by post_hoc »

Love you AFL guys continue moving the goal posts when you lose an argument. You lot were the ones asking why Wanderers dont have fucking 3 million members and when answered you make up so other bullshit, Yawn
Football in NSW
- Football 200,868
- AFL NSW/ACT 28,468
- Rugby League 96,041
- Rugby Union 40,685
Football has 22% more players than the other football codes combined
Thresher
Rookie
Rookie
Reactions:
Posts: 67
Joined: Thu Aug 11, 2016 1:16 am
Team: Western Sydney Wanderers
Location:

Re: dominating on the field but no one cares

Post by Thresher »

all sydney final and still western sydney is just waiting for the wanderers to start, its not buzzing like any of the sydney derbies or when the wanderers made the finals yes i know 2 weeks away but a lot of people are talking about the next real sydney derby and that is about 6 weeks away
Swans4ever
Coach
Coach
Reactions:
Posts: 5933
Joined: Thu Apr 04, 2013 8:52 pm
Team: Sydney Swans
Location:

Re: dominating on the field but no one cares

Post by Swans4ever »

post_hoc wrote:
Swans4ever wrote:
post_hoc wrote:
GWS Membership by end of season 15,311, over 2 cities, with go knows how many non ticket members and there most successful season to date

Wanderers 16845, memberships been open a little more than 1 month, and still 6 weeks before the start of the season.

Playing out of the same ground as well. I hope we get the GWS attendance counter we will end up with 30,000 every game.
Well that's super.....the question isn't why are the WSW this successful it's why aren't they more?? 3 mil pop in WS, main migrants who come from countries where soccer is their 1st language yet only 16k. Why not 100k members and sell outs week in and week out at ANZ after all it only holds 84k with relatively little in the way of competition- yet Melb Victory has twice members, crowd revenue - me thinks your boasting is really highlighting the fact they should in reality be doing much better!!! AF in this part of Syd is as foreign as icebergs in the Sahara dessert!!!!
Rather simple, unlike the AFL who count members who have written an email to the club, the Wanderers membership consists of season ticket holders. The home ground for their entire existence had a capacity of 20,000 plus change, of which we had to reserve 15,000 or more for away fans (league rules) and reserve some for walk ups. so we could have a maximum of 16500. So how can we sell more memberships than we have seats?

oh thats right, we can sell pet memberships like your mob, so how could we sell more memberships bright spark
Well perhaps you should actually research that before you comment
3 match package $100
5 match membership package for WSW $120
Baby membership $40
Out of town membership $80
Junior membership $50
Supporter membership $80

Seems your just an idiot with a big mouth! :)))
LARGEST MEMBERSHIP, LARGEST PROFIT, LARGEST HOME CROWD AVERAGE - THE BIGGEST CLUB IN SYDNEY - THE SYDNEY SWANS
User avatar
post_hoc
Coach
Coach
Reactions:
Posts: 2256
Joined: Fri Oct 17, 2014 1:09 pm
Team: Western Sydney Wanderers
Location:

Re: dominating on the field but no one cares

Post by post_hoc »

Swans4ever wrote:
post_hoc wrote:
Swans4ever wrote:
post_hoc wrote:
GWS Membership by end of season 15,311, over 2 cities, with go knows how many non ticket members and there most successful season to date

Wanderers 16845, memberships been open a little more than 1 month, and still 6 weeks before the start of the season.

Playing out of the same ground as well. I hope we get the GWS attendance counter we will end up with 30,000 every game.
Well that's super.....the question isn't why are the WSW this successful it's why aren't they more?? 3 mil pop in WS, main migrants who come from countries where soccer is their 1st language yet only 16k. Why not 100k members and sell outs week in and week out at ANZ after all it only holds 84k with relatively little in the way of competition- yet Melb Victory has twice members, crowd revenue - me thinks your boasting is really highlighting the fact they should in reality be doing much better!!! AF in this part of Syd is as foreign as icebergs in the Sahara dessert!!!!
Rather simple, unlike the AFL who count members who have written an email to the club, the Wanderers membership consists of season ticket holders. The home ground for their entire existence had a capacity of 20,000 plus change, of which we had to reserve 15,000 or more for away fans (league rules) and reserve some for walk ups. so we could have a maximum of 16500. So how can we sell more memberships than we have seats?

oh thats right, we can sell pet memberships like your mob, so how could we sell more memberships bright spark
Well perhaps you should actually research that before you comment
3 match package $100
5 match membership package for WSW $120
Baby membership $40
Out of town membership $80
Junior membership $50
Supporter membership $80

Seems your just an idiot with a big mouth! :)))
I know the memberships and the prices, the membership figures published by the club do not take into consideration, out of town members, nor baby members, nor junior members, nor supporter members. Thanks for playing
Football in NSW
- Football 200,868
- AFL NSW/ACT 28,468
- Rugby League 96,041
- Rugby Union 40,685
Football has 22% more players than the other football codes combined
Swans4ever
Coach
Coach
Reactions:
Posts: 5933
Joined: Thu Apr 04, 2013 8:52 pm
Team: Sydney Swans
Location:

Re: dominating on the field but no one cares

Post by Swans4ever »

post_hoc wrote:
Swans4ever wrote:
post_hoc wrote:
Swans4ever wrote:
post_hoc wrote:
GWS Membership by end of season 15,311, over 2 cities, with go knows how many non ticket members and there most successful season to date

Wanderers 16845, memberships been open a little more than 1 month, and still 6 weeks before the start of the season.

Playing out of the same ground as well. I hope we get the GWS attendance counter we will end up with 30,000 every game.
Well that's super.....the question isn't why are the WSW this successful it's why aren't they more?? 3 mil pop in WS, main migrants who come from countries where soccer is their 1st language yet only 16k. Why not 100k members and sell outs week in and week out at ANZ after all it only holds 84k with relatively little in the way of competition- yet Melb Victory has twice members, crowd revenue - me thinks your boasting is really highlighting the fact they should in reality be doing much better!!! AF in this part of Syd is as foreign as icebergs in the Sahara dessert!!!!
Rather simple, unlike the AFL who count members who have written an email to the club, the Wanderers membership consists of season ticket holders. The home ground for their entire existence had a capacity of 20,000 plus change, of which we had to reserve 15,000 or more for away fans (league rules) and reserve some for walk ups. so we could have a maximum of 16500. So how can we sell more memberships than we have seats?

oh thats right, we can sell pet memberships like your mob, so how could we sell more memberships bright spark
Well perhaps you should actually research that before you comment
3 match package $100
5 match membership package for WSW $120
Baby membership $40
Out of town membership $80
Junior membership $50
Supporter membership $80

Seems your just an idiot with a big mouth! :)))
I know the memberships and the prices, the membership figures published by the club do not take into consideration, out of town members, nor baby members, nor junior members, nor supporter members. Thanks for playing
Then perhaps you should post these so called full 13 game memberships as it doesn't pass the reasonable test! Full of BS!
LARGEST MEMBERSHIP, LARGEST PROFIT, LARGEST HOME CROWD AVERAGE - THE BIGGEST CLUB IN SYDNEY - THE SYDNEY SWANS
Swans4ever
Coach
Coach
Reactions:
Posts: 5933
Joined: Thu Apr 04, 2013 8:52 pm
Team: Sydney Swans
Location:

Re: dominating on the field but no one cares

Post by Swans4ever »

It seems that the full season ticket holders are limited to 16,000 therefore as their membership figure is in excess of this figure it is far to assume that their membership total DOES include 5 game and 3 game memberships which again makes you full of shit!

http://www.smh.com.au/sport/soccer/alea ... 0b2tb.html
LARGEST MEMBERSHIP, LARGEST PROFIT, LARGEST HOME CROWD AVERAGE - THE BIGGEST CLUB IN SYDNEY - THE SYDNEY SWANS
User avatar
post_hoc
Coach
Coach
Reactions:
Posts: 2256
Joined: Fri Oct 17, 2014 1:09 pm
Team: Western Sydney Wanderers
Location:

Re: dominating on the field but no one cares

Post by post_hoc »

An article form 2014? discussing memberships for a stadium we are not playing in this year? (yes we are playing in a bigger stadium) Current membership is at 17071. So can I suggest before you claim i am full of shit, and before you make an even bigger arse of yourself, do a little bit of research.
Football in NSW
- Football 200,868
- AFL NSW/ACT 28,468
- Rugby League 96,041
- Rugby Union 40,685
Football has 22% more players than the other football codes combined
Swans4ever
Coach
Coach
Reactions:
Posts: 5933
Joined: Thu Apr 04, 2013 8:52 pm
Team: Sydney Swans
Location:

Re: dominating on the field but no one cares

Post by Swans4ever »

post_hoc wrote:
An article form 2014? discussing memberships for a stadium we are not playing in this year? (yes we are playing in a bigger stadium) Current membership is at 17071. So can I suggest before you claim i am full of shit, and before you make an even bigger arse of yourself, do a little bit of research.
So far I have found NOTHINGto back up the claim YOU made that WSW membership numbers ONLY include full season memberships - you made the claim not me - put up or shut TFU - you have done NO reasearch I have again your full of shit until shown otherwise (which has been asked for!)
LARGEST MEMBERSHIP, LARGEST PROFIT, LARGEST HOME CROWD AVERAGE - THE BIGGEST CLUB IN SYDNEY - THE SYDNEY SWANS
Post Reply