Senate committee ask why the NRL took no action on drug cheats

[leagueiscrap]

We need of the oxygen bottles but but excuses to explain some of this?

[eelofwest]

The case of the Cronulla five was mentioned last week in a Senate committee hearing where ASADA chief executive, Ben McDevitt, was asked why the NRL had not acted against the players.

McDevitt said he had asked the same question.

The NRL's approach to doping matters is to provide the parties with the notices, together with a brief of evidence. This includes information from ASADA, together with any relevant detail from the defamation case.

While the Cronulla five were subject to the same 2011 doping regime as the players who were given a backdated suspension of only three matches, they did not admit guilt.

The lawyers for the five will presumably argue they should receive the same suspension but the NRL is mindful ASADA would argue otherwise and potentially appeal a light sentence to WADA.

Should the players contest the case, it will be headed to the NRL's Anti Doping Tribunal, chaired by Ian Callinan, QC.


http://m.theage.com.au/rugby-league/cro ... z42HoSZWkG


Well well well, looky what we have here.

The 2 Situations were handled differently, and the crimes were of different severity. I don't care to explain to you in detail but if you do not know by now then you are clearly living under a rock.

[leagueiscrap]

The case of the Cronulla five was mentioned last week in a Senate committee hearing where ASADA chief executive, Ben McDevitt, was asked why the NRL had not acted against the players.

McDevitt said he had asked the same question.

The NRL's approach to doping matters is to provide the parties with the notices, together with a brief of evidence. This includes information from ASADA, together with any relevant detail from the defamation case.

While the Cronulla five were subject to the same 2011 doping regime as the players who were given a backdated suspension of only three matches, they did not admit guilt.

The lawyers for the five will presumably argue they should receive the same suspension but the NRL is mindful ASADA would argue otherwise and potentially appeal a light sentence to WADA.

Should the players contest the case, it will be headed to the NRL's Anti Doping Tribunal, chaired by Ian Callinan, QC.


http://m.theage.com.au/rugby-league/cro ... z42HoSZWkG


Well well well, looky what we have here.

The 2 Situations were handled differently, and the crimes were of different severity. I don't care to explain to you in detail but if you do not know by now then you are clearly living under a rock.

Lol well originally the gummy sharks and the nrlol locked asada out. Then the nrlol commissioned being the toothless gutless tiger did nothing, while the AFL kicked essendon out of the finals, suspended the coach, fined the club millions & the club lost draft picks.

Yet you oxygen thieving basement dwellers take the moral high ground claiming the nrlol acted!

[AFLcrap1]

How can one moron get things so fucking wrong ...day after day after day .

Another day ..another lie .
You just keep churning them out .

I wish Sportsbet took odds on how many lies you tell a day .
There's money to be made .


Go read up on what happened you imba
Firstly ..no one locked ASADA out .

Then this says the exact opposite of what you claimed ..




Cronulla Sharks coach Shane Flanagan suspended for a year by NRL as club fined $1 million
Date
December 17, 2013
Comments 48Read later
Brad Walter
Brad Walter
Sports Reporter

The NRL's report is separate to ASADA's investigation, which was launched after the infamous "darkest day in sport" press conference in February this year.
Smith said no action would be taken against any players until the ASADA investigation was complete.
"Whilst at this stage ASADA has not given us any information warranting further infraction notices, that investigation remains ongoing," Smith said.




Read more: http://www.smh.com.au/rugby-league/leag ... z42LvpRZR6

[AFLcrap1]

Incest .
I could be wrong but these 5 players were put on the back burner because they had either retired or were in ESL & about to retire .

What use is persuing a player who will never play in the NRL again .
& is not a registered player anymore .

[leagueiscrap]

How can one moron get things so fucking wrong ...day after day after day .

Another day ..another lie .
You just keep churning them out .

I wish Sportsbet took odds on how many lies you tell a day .
There's money to be made .


Go read up on what happened you imba
Firstly ..no one locked ASADA out .

Then this says the exact opposite of what you claimed ..




Cronulla Sharks coach Shane Flanagan suspended for a year by NRL as club fined $1 million
Date
December 17, 2013
Comments 48Read later
Brad Walter
Brad Walter
Sports Reporter

The NRL's report is separate to ASADA's investigation, which was launched after the infamous "darkest day in sport" press conference in February this year.
Smith said no action would be taken against any players until the ASADA investigation was complete.
"Whilst at this stage ASADA has not given us any information warranting further infraction notices, that investigation remains ongoing," Smith said.




Read more: http://www.smh.com.au/rugby-league/leag ... z42LvpRZR6

I see its another day where I make a post and you magically just log in and reply with some bitter rant

http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/sport/ ... a07e18c7c8

Yet he still showed up to games

[AFLcrap1]

Stop deflecting .
You posted a few whoppers .
I showed you lied .
You said the NRL did nothing .

Why did you claim that .
It takes 5 seconds to google something .
Yet you just post a load of shit
Which makes it easy to show that you hate RL that much that you just tell lie after lie

Now deal with it .
You have problems

It's impossible to have a debate on here because threads just keep getting clogged up with absolute shit .
Lift your game boy .

[AFLcrap1]

Bullshit .
What can the NRL do to players who have already retired .

So if you work for a company & retire & they found out you broke company rules or policy when employed by them ......what can they do ..

Demand you come in on Mon morning so they can give you a written warning ...or sack you .


Lol

[Swans4ever]

I think the big question that should have been ask is why ASADA/WADA choose not to appeal the sentences which were VERY light! Having John Fahey as the head of WADA and ex-RL player and coach - creates certainly the appearance of a conflict of interest!

[ParraEelsNRL]

Cause he likes our game and hates yours.

Seriously, you think a fella of his standing is going to go easy, I think you need to take the foil off for a while, it's obviously too tight.

[Swans4ever]

I think the big question that should have been ask is why ASADA/WADA choose not to appeal the sentences which were VERY light! Having John Fahey as the head of WADA and ex-RL player and coach - creates certainly the appearance of a conflict of interest!

Essendon were offered the same deal iirc.

Don't about that - but why did ASADA appeal Ahmet Said's suspension when his was an energy drink - didn't he end up with 2 yrs??? Seems their penalty was very light yet no appeal?? Then straight afterwards John Fahey steps down. I just think if he was going to without conflict of interest he should have stood down before the decision not to appeal.

[AFLcrap1]

Yes essendrug were offered the same deal .
They very unwisely decided to say no .