Can't or won't answer the question?AFLcrap1 wrote:Lol another fumbler re writing history .
When the TV rights are negotiated & news ltd are on both sides of the table ,how much do you think they saved .
Easy to do when you're selling a product to yourself.
AFL to benefit from backlash against NRL TV deal
Re: AFL to benefit from backlash against NRL TV deal
Re: AFL to benefit from backlash against NRL TV deal
Who knows you put a figure on it .
I would say that news undersold the NRL rights by about 200-300 million .
I would say that news undersold the NRL rights by about 200-300 million .
TLPG 
liar extraordinaire
You should thank me for publishing your IP
and I never published any actual IP. That's it.
I was a mod at the time .
Xman wrote
I also gave them to TLPG believing he was still a mod.I admit I made a mistake.
liar extraordinaire You should thank me for publishing your IP
and I never published any actual IP. That's it.
I was a mod at the time .
Xman wrote
I also gave them to TLPG believing he was still a mod.I admit I made a mistake.
Re: AFL to benefit from backlash against NRL TV deal
Wild guesses is it, why let the facts stand in the way of the perceived truth. How does it work with league fans, if you say it loud enough and often enough it must be true. Always good for a laugh.AFLcrap1 wrote:Who knows you put a figure on it .
I would say that news undersold the NRL rights by about 200-300 million .
Re: AFL to benefit from backlash against NRL TV deal
Slow you avoided putting a figure up .
Lol
My figure comes from the fact we went from 83 mill a yr when news sold the game to itself to over 200 mil a yr .
So yeh we were well undersold .
Lol
My figure comes from the fact we went from 83 mill a yr when news sold the game to itself to over 200 mil a yr .
So yeh we were well undersold .
TLPG liar extraordinaire
You should thank me for publishing your IP
and I never published any actual IP. That's it.
I was a mod at the time .
Xman wrote
I also gave them to TLPG believing he was still a mod.I admit I made a mistake.
liar extraordinaire You should thank me for publishing your IP
and I never published any actual IP. That's it.
I was a mod at the time .
Xman wrote
I also gave them to TLPG believing he was still a mod.I admit I made a mistake.
Re: AFL to benefit from backlash against NRL TV deal
I didn't avoid anything I asked the question and got nothing other than wild guess work and assumptions based on what you perceive to be the truth. How about something other than your opinion to support your story.AFLcrap1 wrote:Slow you avoided putting a figure up .
Lol
My figure comes from the fact we went from 83 mill a yr when news sold the game to itself to over 200 mil a yr .
So yeh we were well undersold .
Re: AFL to benefit from backlash against NRL TV deal
How about you put up a figure .
I posted what actually happened .feel free to show where my figures are wrong .
You just post shit
I posted what actually happened .feel free to show where my figures are wrong .
You just post shit
TLPG liar extraordinaire
You should thank me for publishing your IP
and I never published any actual IP. That's it.
I was a mod at the time .
Xman wrote
I also gave them to TLPG believing he was still a mod.I admit I made a mistake.
liar extraordinaire You should thank me for publishing your IP
and I never published any actual IP. That's it.
I was a mod at the time .
Xman wrote
I also gave them to TLPG believing he was still a mod.I admit I made a mistake.
Re: AFL to benefit from backlash against NRL TV deal
I'm sure I've been down this path with you before, you made a positive claim burden of proof is on you. You stated news ltd cost league 2-300 million prove it.AFLcrap1 wrote:How about you put up a figure .
I posted what actually happened .feel free to show where my figures are wrong .
You just post shit
-
Beaussie
- Site Admin
- Posts: 9660
- Joined: Fri Nov 19, 2004 6:38 pm
- Team: Sydney Swans
- Location: Sydney
Re: AFL to benefit from backlash against NRL TV deal
Who's laughing now dipshit?eelofwest wrote:Keep dreaming, more spin to try and work down the NRL's Pay tv deal....
Nothing new was said in that article and like clockworks the blind fumblers lap it up.... :_<> :_<>
:<> :<> :<>
-
Beaussie
- Site Admin
- Posts: 9660
- Joined: Fri Nov 19, 2004 6:38 pm
- Team: Sydney Swans
- Location: Sydney
Re: AFL to benefit from backlash against NRL TV deal
Hahaha, god love you pussycat.pussycat wrote:Beaussie wrote:Yep, just as I thought. Channel 7, 9, 10 and Foxtel all keen for a piece of the AFL. Let the bidding begin.
Nine, which bought the Nine stations in Perth and Adelaide two years ago as part of a deal under which it paid $450 million over five years for cricket rights, could be in the market for rights to live AFL matches featuring the teams from those two cities.
Live matches, whether home or away, of Port Adelaide and Adelaide, and Fremantle and West Coast, rate extremely well in their home cities and achieve solid figures in Melbourne.
http://www.brisbanetimes.com.au/busines ... iyya0.html
As I said in another thread Beau, there no shame in coming 2nd, you need to accept it a move on.
How's that silver medal looking. Always will be the little one when it comes to the football codes in Australia. Lap it up losers. :<> :<> :<>
Re: AFL to benefit from backlash against NRL TV deal
Lol .
We have only done our FTA side of our deal .
We have only done our FTA side of our deal .
TLPG liar extraordinaire
You should thank me for publishing your IP
and I never published any actual IP. That's it.
I was a mod at the time .
Xman wrote
I also gave them to TLPG believing he was still a mod.I admit I made a mistake.
liar extraordinaire You should thank me for publishing your IP
and I never published any actual IP. That's it.
I was a mod at the time .
Xman wrote
I also gave them to TLPG believing he was still a mod.I admit I made a mistake.