Swans4ever wrote:KE an Internet warrior! Very funny


Oh my .
What a fucking hypocritical tool.
You were the one on here wanting to fight people.
Waaa waaa get in the ring get in the ring .

Waaa waaa .







Swans4ever wrote:KE an Internet warrior! Very funny
You called out jack diddly squat. Imagine claiming prior forum events are infactual when you have just joined a forum and admitted you are clueless to the sites history.Foolproof wrote:Each event that I called out is not factual. Like I said, they are right out of a Hollywood script and did not happen. If they did happen then I suggest you show me.....no I order you to show me (seeing as you like to give orders). Yet again, you snip my comment over "clueless" just to try and look superior when you know I am indeed giving you a hiding.King-Eliagh wrote:the delusions are rampant in this one folks!
He comes in and
1. suggests I am loopy based on my and other members presentation of factual events on these boards
2. Announces to all he is, yes he said it, clueless as he is new.
3. Then announces based on his first assumption that he is giving me a hiding.
The degree of ignorance is astounding and hilarious. He's an AFL boy this one!
But I am learning very quickly that you are someone who deserves no respect at all. To use your own vernacular, pick up your game, son.
xman wrote:KE, why is an even comp important?
Well? Show that they happened. Educate me. Show me;King-Eliagh wrote:You called out jack diddly squat. Imagine claiming prior forum events are infactual when you have just joined a forum and admitted you are clueless to the sites history.Foolproof wrote:Each event that I called out is not factual. Like I said, they are right out of a Hollywood script and did not happen. If they did happen then I suggest you show me.....no I order you to show me (seeing as you like to give orders). Yet again, you snip my comment over "clueless" just to try and look superior when you know I am indeed giving you a hiding.King-Eliagh wrote:the delusions are rampant in this one folks!
He comes in and
1. suggests I am loopy based on my and other members presentation of factual events on these boards
2. Announces to all he is, yes he said it, clueless as he is new.
3. Then announces based on his first assumption that he is giving me a hiding.
The degree of ignorance is astounding and hilarious. He's an AFL boy this one!
But I am learning very quickly that you are someone who deserves no respect at all. To use your own vernacular, pick up your game, son.![]()
A clown walking around dressed in the wizard of oz tinman outfit is what you are.
xman wrote:KE, why is an even comp important?
You were here when they supposedly happened. I was not. Without any keywords to guide me there was no possible way I could search for any indication of them. Your expectations leave the obvious conclusion. You had the lobotomy and not me. And it failed because you are clearly crazed.King-Eliagh wrote:
Seriously, ahhhhh> foolproof? Prove to me that you have not had a labotomy performed by this guy http://m.smh.com.au/nsw/neurosurgeon-su ... 09ikt.html ...because until you do, it happened as it is so unbelievable that it didn't to the casual observer it is laughable.
I mean, only an adult wother the mental capacity of a second grader could rock up, tell everyone they're new and clueless as to what's happened before and then claim certain events didn't happen
Correct in the last sentence. And yet King-Eliagh expects me to take him at his word. I would be lying if I said I believed this nonsense. Can I help that? Why are you trying to force me to believe something I can not without proof? It's my choice and I choose not to believe.The_Wookie wrote:Ok then mr. i got here yesterday.Foolproof wrote:
Well? Show that they happened. Educate me. Show me;
*Who went into overdrive and tried to delete the entire site
*Who pretended they run a mining site
*Who confessed to wearing pink backpacks
*Who as administrator of a multi code forum site has employed AFL supporters as approx 97% of all his moderators
Until you do, they didn't happen as they are so unbelievable to the casual observer they are laughable.
1. Yes the mod prior to me lost his shit and deleted entire forums of content that the site owner then had to restore from the backup.
2. Who gives a fuck
3. Who gives a fuck
4. The site owner has for whatever reason opted to have first Xman (an AFL guy), then Cracker (an AFL guy), as well as Markzz (who i think is an AFL guy but who rarely posts). Oddly enough, Im an AFL guy who was actively pushed for mod by the league guys more than anyone.
None of the above are provable. And they dont fucking have to be.
Oh Lordy!Foolproof wrote:You were here when they supposedly happened. I was not. Without any keywords to guide me there was no possible way I could search for any indication of them. Your expectations leave the obvious conclusion. You had the lobotomy and not me. And it failed because you are clearly crazed.King-Eliagh wrote:
Seriously, ahhhhh> foolproof? Prove to me that you have not had a labotomy performed by this guy http://m.smh.com.au/nsw/neurosurgeon-su ... 09ikt.html ...because until you do, it happened as it is so unbelievable that it didn't to the casual observer it is laughable.
I mean, only an adult wother the mental capacity of a second grader could rock up, tell everyone they're new and clueless as to what's happened before and then claim certain events didn't happen
xman wrote:KE, why is an even comp important?
Foolproof wrote:When it comes to life in general, the person who is clueless is you. You were talking about people, correct? How can I find said people in a search when I don't know who they are? Just looking up "pink backpack" or "own mining site" will tell me nothing.
You carry on like you own the place, King-Eliagh. You are suffering very badly from the tall poppy syndrome. Could it be that you are one of the AFL supporters who used to moderate here?