Rugby League Participation rates about the same as Volleyball

[Raiderdave]

Poor little rugby league shown that their 1.8 million claims were huge lies, 104,000 that is all you get lol

More lies from our little battler
Pork chop
Lie after lie after lie
What a sad pathetic little wanker it is

[post_hoc]

You really don't like the fact that we have all shown that those lies you tell of all those rugby league players were just like unicorns, mythical. 104,000 the ABS shows is all you have

[King-Eliagh]

nice lies, rest of the quote please, I believe I said Football has 250 million world wide, the world wide was about football, stop your lies.

I have continued to say 104,000 was from ABS ie Australia lol.

Once again you have proven to be a liar, you can't handle the fact that 104,000 people want to play your game

now why did you laugh that it was for an estimate?

AFLCRAP_Liar, why did you try to lie on this post? was it because you were just shown to be a fool and needed to lie LOL, how pathetic are you

WHAT rest of the quote .
This is it your whole post




Re: wanderers to get new stadium built(35k)
Postby post_hoc » Mon Nov 17, 2014 5:23 pm

World wide, 104,000 that's all you guys have lol

You got caught out lying.
Then said you didn't say that.
You then claimed I didn't quote the whole post.

Yes I did Homie .
You are looking sadder & more desperate with each post.


Here's a clue ,
Don't fucking lie & you won't have to look like a fucking clown.

Your done pork chop.

Next.

What a pissweak liar.

[post_hoc]

Hey KE_liar, did you see the part where the 104,000 was backed up by Wookies website? How cool, oh sorry not so good for you rugby league boys, 104,000 the ABS doesn't lie lol

[King-Eliagh]

You lied bro. There's simply not 104k worldwide. And there's countless kids playing RL who are under 15 in this country.

You shouldn't lie and try and get away with it dude. It makes you look more lamo. I erred in a thread before and was shown it was untrue. What'd I do? Manned up and said "my bad". Why? Cos I'm a man.

[post_hoc]

Lol I have posted the source, never lied dude, lol dude. I have said time and time again the data source was ABS for Australia, not my fault you guys find that a problem

So KE_liar you just admitted you lied? We all knew that, you continue to do it today, man up and admit it 104,000 is the figure, I said it from the start.

[post_hoc]

Did you know, according to the ABS dataset of 2011-12 that Rugby League participation rates are so bad, that they don't even bother looking at them on an age breakdown. The Top 25 sports and recreation activities are looked at, so AFL is there, Outdoor and indoor Football are looked at separately they are so big, Ballet, Gold etc etc.

But Rugby League have so few people playing that it only exists in the top 55 list.

Total participation Australia wide is 104,100 people, long, long way behind squash with 162,000 a little while behind Hockey with 112,000 and Ice/snow sports with 138,000. Breathing down Rugby Leagues neck are the sports of Volleyball with 100,000 and Badminton with 99400.

The question must be asked will Volleyball overtake Rugby League?

104,000 players pathetic.

See right at the first post participation Australia Wide 104,000. No lie, just the facts

[King-Eliagh]

You said that there was 104k world wide bro. You got quoted as well

I'm just relying on the proof dude. Sorry but it's ur prob to deal with, you wrote it

[post_hoc]

So you going to admit ABS data is correct? Why do you boys lie? 1.8 million is mythical.

Clearly my quote right at the start Australia wide, so dude, you going to admit I was right?

[King-Eliagh]

No, abs is an estimate you clown. Estimates are correct once in a blue moon. Additionally you've stated

A) firstly that 104k is the national total player figure when that figure doesn't include 6-12 year olds

B) then you stated 104k is the worldwide figure.

C) then you reverted back to yet original fallacy.

You're just a liar dude. It's been pointed out for all to see.

Yet again you've failed hard.

[ParraEelsNRL]

Lol I have posted the source, never lied dude, lol dude. I have said time and time again the data source was ABS for Australia

World wide, 104,000 that's all you guys have lol

You really don't like the fact that we have all shown that those lies you tell of all those rugby league players were just like unicorns, mythical. 104,000 the ABS shows is all you have

World wide, 104,000 that's all you guys have lol

Lol I have posted the source, never lied dude

[post_hoc]

Explained the worldwide comment in context of 250 million for football.

Showed very first post on here Australia wide lol

So going to admit the 104,000 was correct? The 1.8 million were lies lol

[post_hoc]

No, abs is an estimate you clown. Estimates are correct once in a blue moon. Additionally you've stated
:

Love this bit, aren't TV ratings estimates? You bang on and on about TV ratings, but aren't they just estimates?

So in your words those TV ratings are correct once in a blue moon.

Your welcome

[ParraEelsNRL]

You said world wide, you said 104 thousand and that's it.

Tell us all how we are supposed to take that?

Either you are lying or there are more than 104,000 playing world wide, which is it?

[post_hoc]

As KE_liar has just admitted that TV ratings can't be believed because they are only estimates and are only right once in a blue moon, then NRL pretty much have nothing, crowds are dismal, especially compared to AFL, they banged on and on about ratings but KE_liar now bePieces they can't be trusted, and now we have proof that 104,000 is the ABS figures.

Wow bad day for the NRL