againPhelpsy wrote:Again rl in South Australia would be akin to Aussie rules in Fiji. If that.
you're a bubble dwelling fucktard

againPhelpsy wrote:Again rl in South Australia would be akin to Aussie rules in Fiji. If that.
Pathetic isn't it how RL tries to include touch footy in their participation numbers. Like you say, you may as well call Union, League.Phelpsy wrote:Yes but touch footy isn't rl. You may as well say union is league.
Beaussie wrote:Pathetic isn't it how RL tries to include touch footy in their participation numbers. Like you say, you may as well call Union, League.Phelpsy wrote:Yes but touch footy isn't rl. You may as well say union is league.
despite times, dwindling participation numbers, so the NRL heads out and signs up the touch comp to carry its logoAFLcrap1 wrote:Beaussie wrote:Pathetic isn't it how RL tries to include touch footy in their participation numbers. Like you say, you may as well call Union, League.Phelpsy wrote:Yes but touch footy isn't rl. You may as well say union is league.![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 7 guests