Don't think so stupid.leagueiscrap wrote:he certainly does swans4ever, he knows all about the penalties of stalking, as he has probably been done for it many times before & been caughtSwans4ever wrote:WTF - you have serious issue AFLCRAPPER!AFLcrap1 wrote:NRLCrap1 wrote:You're calling the ACT Health Directorate and the Canberra and Baillie Henderson Hospitals unreliable sources, meat puppet? Wow.![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
So let me get this straight .
You are admitting to Criminal activity.
Peoples medical records are not for anyone to see
So you are admitting searching for ,trading emails & info about Someone's(& it aint me you fuckhead)personal & Medical details.
.Stalkers always get caught.
GOT YA.
http://www.lawhandbook.org.au/handbook/ch19s01s04.php
Confidentiality in hospitals and other services
The law preserving confidentiality in public and private hospitals, day procedure centres and community health centres (called "relevant health services" in the Act) is to be found in section 141 of the Health Services Act 1988 (Vic) ("HSA 1988"). The section applies to the health service itself, the board of the service, or a person who is or was a member of the board, a delegate to a board, a proprietor of such a service, or engaged or employed in a service or performing work for it. These people are generally prohibited from disclosing information that could directly or indirectly identify a patient. If they do disclose such information, they have committed an offence under the HSA 1988 for which they may be fined up to $7,218 (this figure is based on 50 penalty units with a value of $144.36 each).
In addition, the HRA 2001 and the PA 1988 confer statutory privacy rights on patients, whether they are treated in a public or private facility. Both Acts set up complaint procedures for patients who believe confidential information about them has been unlawfully disclosed to a third party. For more information on this, see Chapter 21.5: Privacy Rights.
Note, however, there are some exceptions to the statutory privacy protection and doctors are sometimes required, or authorised, to disclose confidential information about patients. For example, if a breach of confidentiality is required to carry out a function under an Act, or the giving out of the information is authorised or required by an Act, then it is permissible to give out information.
Im not the one on here (your very much in need oh help mate cwapper is the one ),who sought out info about posters,gloated he had info ,then tried to use it .
He has now been caught out ,as I just showed there is no legal way you can get info about anyones medical records .
So now he has run away..
I will (in the spirit of his sport) give him 1 unco point for trying & missing badly.