Strength: hayne by a country mile
Speed: hayne strides ahead
Power: hayne by a country mile
Vertical leap: hayne by 6-10 inches
Agility: hayne would comfortably win agility tests
Long distance trotting: ablett

xman wrote:KE, why is an even comp important?
what about kicking, catching, ball retention, awareness and ball skills in general? how do you know hayne would win agility tests? have you seen him take them or does your judgement come from watching him play on tv while you sit on your couch with a can of beer?King-Eliagh wrote:Well it's about time we matchup two of the greatest athletes and players of their code. Note that many in AFL land say Ablett is the greatest ever.
Strength: hayne by a country mile
Speed: hayne strides ahead
Power: hayne by a country mile
Vertical leap: hayne by 6-10 inches
Agility: hayne would comfortably win agility tests
Long distance trotting: ablett
because it's true.
Nothing better than an AFL fan pretending to be a fan of something else.sydneyfc wrote:what about kicking, catching, ball retention, awareness and ball skills in general? how do you know hayne would win agility tests? have you seen him take them or does your judgement come from watching him play on tv while you sit on your couch with a can of beer?King-Eliagh wrote:Well it's about time we matchup two of the greatest athletes and players of their code. Note that many in AFL land say Ablett is the greatest ever.
Strength: hayne by a country mile
Speed: hayne strides ahead
Power: hayne by a country mile
Vertical leap: hayne by 6-10 inches
Agility: hayne would comfortably win agility tests
Long distance trotting: ablett
because it's true.
btw i thought greg inglis was the best player in rugby league, certainly from an athletic point of view hes the superior athlete to hayne
is this as good as it gets from you? parra tried that card already and it didn't workAFLcrap1 wrote:Nothing better than an AFL fan pretending to be a fan of something else.sydneyfc wrote:what about kicking, catching, ball retention, awareness and ball skills in general? how do you know hayne would win agility tests? have you seen him take them or does your judgement come from watching him play on tv while you sit on your couch with a can of beer?King-Eliagh wrote:Well it's about time we matchup two of the greatest athletes and players of their code. Note that many in AFL land say Ablett is the greatest ever.
Strength: hayne by a country mile
Speed: hayne strides ahead
Power: hayne by a country mile
Vertical leap: hayne by 6-10 inches
Agility: hayne would comfortably win agility tests
Long distance trotting: ablett
because it's true.
btw i thought greg inglis was the best player in rugby league, certainly from an athletic point of view hes the superior athlete to hayne
But true colours are shown as soon as a negative fumblepost is put up.
Garry AblettKing-Eliagh wrote:Well it's about time we matchup two of the greatest athletes and players of their code. Note that many in AFL land say Ablett is the greatest ever.
Strength: hayne by a country mile
Speed: hayne strides ahead
Power: hayne by a country mile
Vertical leap: hayne by 6-10 inches
Agility: hayne would comfortably win agility tests
Long distance trotting: ablett
because it's true.
I didn't realise either player was in the Rexona Challenge - so I guess ur option is about as reliable as the next RL propagandist!AFLcrap1 wrote:The Brownpole medal.
Bhaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa.
Did he beat all those players from overseas.
Just like Bert Dildo in the Rexona Challenge(he was talked up as a superstar & could match Usain Bolt over 100M),got flogged by a midget ex jockey.
So why would this twit be any different.
There is no one to try their so called skills against,so fumblefans have them as a superstar.
When they step out of the bubble they get shown up
Ok every RL player has the same physical attributes and every AF player like wise??? Very narrow minded even for you! =D> =D> =D>AFLcrap1 wrote:Well dumbo we can only go on what we have seen when the Great fumblers had a go against a midget & got smacked.
So tell why would this twit do any better.
:_<> :_<> :_<>Swans4ever wrote:Ok every RL player has the same physical attributes and every AF player like wise??? Very narrow minded even for you! =D> =D> =D>AFLcrap1 wrote:Well dumbo we can only go on what we have seen when the Great fumblers had a go against a midget & got smacked.
So tell why would this twit do any better.
Drugs? A dildo? A flogging? Interesting weekend you are having crapperAFLcrap1 wrote::_<> :_<> :_<>Swans4ever wrote:Ok every RL player has the same physical attributes and every AF player like wise??? Very narrow minded even for you! =D> =D> =D>AFLcrap1 wrote:Well dumbo we can only go on what we have seen when the Great fumblers had a go against a midget & got smacked.
So tell why would this twit do any better.
You sent your best & they got flogged.
Tell me what makes the druggo's son any better than Dildo?.
xman wrote:KE, why is an even comp important?
And it's time to wake up KE and stop fantasising about RL players - and Gary Ablett is better don't care what you say - everyone north of the Murray knows Ablett very few would know Hayne in the Southern States and chest marking is always easier - it takes skill to use your hands to mark - a skill that is hard learned!King-Eliagh wrote:In terms of athlete Haynes just all over Ablett the trotter.
In terms of skills well we are talking about two diff games so the comparisons re marking and kicking don't matchup and are therefore meaningless. I.e hayne could mark and kick a bomb better than Ablett. And vice versa for your standard drop punt.
Look guys we just have to face the truth. The best Rl players are much more supreme athletes than your best marngrookers. Faster, stronger, tougher, more powerful and more agile.
Oh and sydfc pansy? Of course hayne is more agile. Rl backs require a high degree of agility as they work in more confined spaces with the aim to beat their opponents through fancy footwork.
Guys I'm sorry if all this offends but it's just the truth. Let's just face it together and be unified on this one eh?? You'll all be looking rather silly if you don't folks
xman wrote:KE, why is an even comp important?
Ur kidding right - must have laid at least 10 tackles tonight - just because he looks slow doesn't mean he is - I was watching Goodes running on the wing bouncing and I could swear he was jogging until you looked at the player chasing him busting a boiler - that was at the MCG Friday I saw the Foxtel replay and he looked even slower. Because your watching one line attacking another line rather than AFL being all over the ground - when a RL player breaks the line he will look faster - a RL player DOESNT have to run as far or as often or as long - so again your wrong!King-Eliagh wrote:I'm talking about athleticism swines ya clown. Ablett's slower, weaker, less powerful, less agile, not as tough.
Comon mate, man up and admit the bleeding obvious