Who listens to the radio?

[Terry]

https://radiotoday.com.au/triple-m-foot ... -kick-off/

Triple M’s AFL coverage and expert commentary across Melbourne, Adelaide and Perth reported a cumulative audience of 626,000, while Triple M’s NRL coverage and commentary by the best has an audience of 471,000 across Sydney and Brisbane.

As I was reading this article I though it sounded as dodgy as a two bob watch. Then I read the comments. The first says, "Is this a serious journalism piece or a re-pasting of a publicity output by SCA?".

Incredibly the 2nd was from the Editor of the piece. You know, the person who is in charge of the content of the publication. And what did the editor reply, "Jon, fair point. We have made some edits to the SCA release."

So there ya have it. The editor agrees that it wasn't serious journalism. He agrees it was just a re-pasting of promo material. To the extent they were forced to make some edits to the piece. I.E. the original piece was full of BS.

Conclusion: You can safely tear up this Goebbels like propaganda and throw it in the bin where it belongs.

Ahh terrybull,
As there is crap flying all around this site, from all directions, it was a suitable post.
But again I do not listen to footy on the radio…..before live tv broadcasts….all the time, but sometimes technology is a wonderful thing…

That's great ineQUOLLity. So you decided to add a little more crap to the site. Seems a rather silly thing to do. But you are a fumble fan so anything is possible.

[Quolls2019]

As I was reading this article I though it sounded as dodgy as a two bob watch. Then I read the comments. The first says, "Is this a serious journalism piece or a re-pasting of a publicity output by SCA?".

Incredibly the 2nd was from the Editor of the piece. You know, the person who is in charge of the content of the publication. And what did the editor reply, "Jon, fair point. We have made some edits to the SCA release."

So there ya have it. The editor agrees that it wasn't serious journalism. He agrees it was just a re-pasting of promo material. To the extent they were forced to make some edits to the piece. I.E. the original piece was full of BS.

Conclusion: You can safely tear up this Goebbels like propaganda and throw it in the bin where it belongs.

Ahh terrybull,
As there is crap flying all around this site, from all directions, it was a suitable post.
But again I do not listen to footy on the radio…..before live tv broadcasts….all the time, but sometimes technology is a wonderful thing…

That's great ineQUOLLity. So you decided to add a little more crap to the site. Seems a rather silly thing to do. But you are a fumble fan so anything is possible.

Perhaps, but not my crap.

[Terry]

Ahh terrybull,
As there is crap flying all around this site, from all directions, it was a suitable post.
But again I do not listen to footy on the radio…..before live tv broadcasts….all the time, but sometimes technology is a wonderful thing…

That's great ineQUOLLity. So you decided to add a little more crap to the site. Seems a rather silly thing to do. But you are a fumble fan so anything is possible.

Perhaps, but not my crap.

No. But you knew it was crap. So on this site you own it.

[Quolls2019]

That's great ineQUOLLity. So you decided to add a little more crap to the site. Seems a rather silly thing to do. But you are a fumble fan so anything is possible.

Perhaps, but not my crap.

No. But you knew it was crap. So on this site you own it.

Terrybull
Speaking for everyone from your high tower of…
I don't know its crap.
I’m not all that interested if it is or isn't.
but your comments do not prove it is, or it isn't.

[Terry]

Perhaps, but not my crap.

No. But you knew it was crap. So on this site you own it.

Terrybull
Speaking for everyone from your high tower of…
I don't know its crap.
I’m not all that interested if it is or isn't.
but your comments do not prove it is, or it isn't.

I'm quite aware of that pal. Just as you should be aware the comments of the editor of the piece confirm it as such.

[Quolls2019]

Ahh terrybull
Enough said…chum…

[truthbomber]

https://radiotoday.com.au/triple-m-foot ... -kick-off/

Triple M’s AFL coverage and expert commentary across Melbourne, Adelaide and Perth reported a cumulative audience of 626,000, while Triple M’s NRL coverage and commentary by the best has an audience of 471,000 across Sydney and Brisbane.

As I was reading this article I though it sounded as dodgy as a two bob watch. Then I read the comments. The first says, "Is this a serious journalism piece or a re-pasting of a publicity output by SCA?".

Incredibly the 2nd was from the Editor of the piece. You know, the person who is in charge of the content of the publication. And what did the editor reply, "Jon, fair point. We have made some edits to the SCA release."

So there ya have it. The editor agrees that it wasn't serious journalism. He agrees it was just a re-pasting of promo material. To the extent they were forced to make some edits to the piece. I.E. the original piece was full of BS.

Conclusion: You can safely tear up this Goebbels like propaganda and throw it in the bin where it belongs.

tez tez tez

the 3 rules

the 3 rules

they ALWAYS apply in any thread started by a fumbler

end of