Quolls2019 wrote: ↑Sat Aug 27, 2022 5:37 pmAhh terrybull,Terry wrote: ↑Sat Aug 27, 2022 4:48 pmAs I was reading this article I though it sounded as dodgy as a two bob watch. Then I read the comments. The first says, "Is this a serious journalism piece or a re-pasting of a publicity output by SCA?".Quolls2019 wrote: ↑Sat Aug 27, 2022 7:45 am https://radiotoday.com.au/triple-m-foot ... -kick-off/
Triple M’s AFL coverage and expert commentary across Melbourne, Adelaide and Perth reported a cumulative audience of 626,000, while Triple M’s NRL coverage and commentary by the best has an audience of 471,000 across Sydney and Brisbane.
Incredibly the 2nd was from the Editor of the piece. You know, the person who is in charge of the content of the publication. And what did the editor reply, "Jon, fair point. We have made some edits to the SCA release."
So there ya have it. The editor agrees that it wasn't serious journalism. He agrees it was just a re-pasting of promo material. To the extent they were forced to make some edits to the piece. I.E. the original piece was full of BS.
Conclusion: You can safely tear up this Goebbels like propaganda and throw it in the bin where it belongs.
As there is crap flying all around this site, from all directions, it was a suitable post.
But again I do not listen to footy on the radio…..before live tv broadcasts….all the time, but sometimes technology is a wonderful thing…
That's great ineQUOLLity. So you decided to add a little more crap to the site. Seems a rather silly thing to do. But you are a fumble fan so anything is possible.