Streaming companies want to broadcast AFL

Discuss the footy industry, crowds, tv ratings, memberships, sponsorships and the finances of all Australian football codes and clubs
WookieReturns
Captain
Captain
Posts: 533
Joined: Wed Dec 12, 2012 7:22 am
Team: Carlton
Location:
Has thanked: 21 times
Been liked: 98 times
Contact:

Re: Streaming companies want to broadcast AFL

Post by WookieReturns »

Its literally the only tweet where i mention it I believe.

Unless you have another one? I couldnt find one in a search of my feed.
TLPG
Coach
Coach
Posts: 3478
Joined: Wed May 09, 2007 9:15 pm
Team: MYOB
Location: MYOB
Has thanked: 18 times
Been liked: 8 times

Re: Streaming companies want to broadcast AFL

Post by TLPG »

Don't ask him for a link. He's scared of that.
THIS FORUM IS RACIST
AFLcrap1
Coach
Coach
Posts: 18930
Joined: Wed Oct 30, 2013 9:49 am
Team: The Scottish Puffins
Location:
Has thanked: 107 times
Been liked: 75 times

Re: Streaming companies want to broadcast AFL

Post by AFLcrap1 »

TLPG wrote: Thu Aug 11, 2022 9:55 am
Don't ask him for a link. He's scared of that.
Pot meet kettle
TLPG 🤣liar extraordinaire
You should thank me for publishing your IP

and I never published any actual IP. That's it.
🤣
I was a mod at the time .
Xman wrote
I also gave them to TLPG believing he was still a mod.I admit I made a mistake.
:^o :^o
User avatar
leeroy*NRL*
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 6317
Joined: Mon Jan 19, 2015 2:54 pm
Team: St George Illawarra Dragons
Location: Gold Coast
Has thanked: 215 times
Been liked: 67 times

Re: Streaming companies want to broadcast AFL

Post by leeroy*NRL* »

Reports that Paramount had lowballed the AFL and offered less than even the current deal are not understood to be accurate, according to sources. But Paramount co-boss Beverley McGarvey told this masthead a reported $600 million figure was not correct.

More AFL games are likely to end up behind a paywall in the next broadcast deal, regardless of which party wins the bid for the AFL rights.

Sources familiar with discussions said that the AFL is being asked to consider some home team games behind a paywall in Western Australia and South Australia – there are none in the current deal – and potentially some in the developing markets of NSW and Queensland.

A further factor for the broadcast bidding is the potential entrance of a 19th team, in the form of Tasmania, should that be approved. Tasmania would provide a further 11 games for the broadcasters and the bidders have been asked to cover the possibility of a 19th team in their pitches.

https://www.theage.com.au/sport/afl/mor ... 5b8ul.html
WookieReturns
Captain
Captain
Posts: 533
Joined: Wed Dec 12, 2012 7:22 am
Team: Carlton
Location:
Has thanked: 21 times
Been liked: 98 times
Contact:

Re: Streaming companies want to broadcast AFL

Post by WookieReturns »

TLPG wrote: Thu Aug 11, 2022 9:55 am
Don't ask him for a link. He's scared of that.
people that ask for links are almost as bad. Its an internet forum, not a PHD. You disagree with something? Onus should be on you to find the proof that someone is wrong, not the other way around.
These users liked the author WookieReturns for the post:
leeroy*NRL* (Thu Aug 11, 2022 12:13 pm)
TLPG
Coach
Coach
Posts: 3478
Joined: Wed May 09, 2007 9:15 pm
Team: MYOB
Location: MYOB
Has thanked: 18 times
Been liked: 8 times

Re: Streaming companies want to broadcast AFL

Post by TLPG »

AFLcrap1 wrote: Thu Aug 11, 2022 10:42 am
TLPG wrote: Thu Aug 11, 2022 9:55 am
Don't ask him for a link. He's scared of that.
Pot meet kettle
You haven't asked me for anything in that regard so you're wrong.
THIS FORUM IS RACIST
TLPG
Coach
Coach
Posts: 3478
Joined: Wed May 09, 2007 9:15 pm
Team: MYOB
Location: MYOB
Has thanked: 18 times
Been liked: 8 times

Re: Streaming companies want to broadcast AFL

Post by TLPG »

Gone wrote: Thu Aug 11, 2022 11:47 am
TLPG wrote: Thu Aug 11, 2022 9:55 am
Don't ask him for a link. He's scared of that.
people that ask for links are almost as bad. Its an internet forum, not a PHD. You disagree with something? Onus should be on you to find the proof that someone is wrong, not the other way around.
Sorry but you're wrong. If someone makes a claim they should have the back up ready to go, and not expect the other person to go looking for it. The onus switches only when the proof of the original claim is given.
THIS FORUM IS RACIST
User avatar
leeroy*NRL*
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 6317
Joined: Mon Jan 19, 2015 2:54 pm
Team: St George Illawarra Dragons
Location: Gold Coast
Has thanked: 215 times
Been liked: 67 times

Re: Streaming companies want to broadcast AFL

Post by leeroy*NRL* »

TLPG wrote: Thu Aug 11, 2022 1:18 pm
Gone wrote: Thu Aug 11, 2022 11:47 am
TLPG wrote: Thu Aug 11, 2022 9:55 am
Don't ask him for a link. He's scared of that.
people that ask for links are almost as bad. Its an internet forum, not a PHD. You disagree with something? Onus should be on you to find the proof that someone is wrong, not the other way around.
Sorry but you're wrong. If someone makes a claim they should have the back up ready to go, and not expect the other person to go looking for it. The onus switches only when the proof of the original claim is given.
it can go both ways, making a statement, is always better when ya have proof..
otherwise you could be lying through ya teeth and things go around in circles.

i dont mind either way..
TLPG
Coach
Coach
Posts: 3478
Joined: Wed May 09, 2007 9:15 pm
Team: MYOB
Location: MYOB
Has thanked: 18 times
Been liked: 8 times

Re: Streaming companies want to broadcast AFL

Post by TLPG »

There is a starting point though and that's what I believe should be focused on. First claimant gives. If they don't, they are the problem. Or they can simply admit it's an opinion. THEN the onus switches.
These users liked the author TLPG for the post:
leeroy*NRL* (Thu Aug 11, 2022 1:52 pm)
THIS FORUM IS RACIST
WookieReturns
Captain
Captain
Posts: 533
Joined: Wed Dec 12, 2012 7:22 am
Team: Carlton
Location:
Has thanked: 21 times
Been liked: 98 times
Contact:

Re: Streaming companies want to broadcast AFL

Post by WookieReturns »

TLPG wrote: Thu Aug 11, 2022 1:18 pm
Sorry but you're wrong. If someone makes a claim they should have the back up ready to go, and not expect the other person to go looking for it. The onus switches only when the proof of the original claim is given.
You're the one disputing the original claim, you disprove it. Or you're as bad as everyone else.

And in this particular instance, you are wrong.
User avatar
Quolls2019
Coach
Coach
Posts: 1791
Joined: Mon Jul 01, 2019 1:20 pm
Team: North Melbourne
Location: Melbourne
Has thanked: 44 times
Been liked: 119 times

Re: Streaming companies want to broadcast AFL

Post by Quolls2019 »

TLPG wrote: Thu Aug 11, 2022 1:50 pm
There is a starting point though and that's what I believe should be focused on. First claimant gives. If they don't, they are the problem. Or they can simply admit it's an opinion. THEN the onus switches.
If someone makes a statement of what they say is fact, the onus should be on them to supply some factual support.
In the words of Julius Sumner Miller…..”why is it so”

I have no issues with that.
These users liked the author Quolls2019 for the post:
TLPG (Thu Aug 11, 2022 5:01 pm)
There are lies, damn lies and then there are ratings.
Rugby league, Australias most popular game in some of North Eastern Australia.
TLPG
Coach
Coach
Posts: 3478
Joined: Wed May 09, 2007 9:15 pm
Team: MYOB
Location: MYOB
Has thanked: 18 times
Been liked: 8 times

Re: Streaming companies want to broadcast AFL

Post by TLPG »

Gone wrote: Thu Aug 11, 2022 3:34 pm
TLPG wrote: Thu Aug 11, 2022 1:18 pm
Sorry but you're wrong. If someone makes a claim they should have the back up ready to go, and not expect the other person to go looking for it. The onus switches only when the proof of the original claim is given.
You're the one disputing the original claim, you disprove it. Or you're as bad as everyone else.

And in this particular instance, you are wrong.
I am disputing the original claim because there was no proof. I don't have to disprove it. Not my job. If they prove it with a link - THEN I have to disprove it. That is how it works. If you don't think so then you are part of the problem.
THIS FORUM IS RACIST
WookieReturns
Captain
Captain
Posts: 533
Joined: Wed Dec 12, 2012 7:22 am
Team: Carlton
Location:
Has thanked: 21 times
Been liked: 98 times
Contact:

Re: Streaming companies want to broadcast AFL

Post by WookieReturns »

TLPG wrote: Thu Aug 11, 2022 5:01 pm


I am disputing the original claim because there was no proof. I don't have to disprove it. Not my job. If they prove it with a link - THEN I have to disprove it. That is how it works. If you don't think so then you are part of the problem.
lol its no one job to do shit around here. We're all just digital ships passing in the night.
TLPG
Coach
Coach
Posts: 3478
Joined: Wed May 09, 2007 9:15 pm
Team: MYOB
Location: MYOB
Has thanked: 18 times
Been liked: 8 times

Re: Streaming companies want to broadcast AFL

Post by TLPG »

That's right - don't take responsibility for what you say.
THIS FORUM IS RACIST
WookieReturns
Captain
Captain
Posts: 533
Joined: Wed Dec 12, 2012 7:22 am
Team: Carlton
Location:
Has thanked: 21 times
Been liked: 98 times
Contact:

Re: Streaming companies want to broadcast AFL

Post by WookieReturns »

TLPG wrote: Thu Aug 11, 2022 5:15 pm
That's right - don't take responsibility for what you say.
I take responsibility for everything i can post. And it can usually be verified with links and data from my twitter feed, the one thats also shown on this site.

Im saying that its no ones job to answer to anyone else around here.
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests