Page 37 of 64

Re: GWS / SUNS >> How much more dollars

Posted: Mon Oct 21, 2019 11:48 am
by Fred
First Dibs is not exclusive - it is priority access. First choice is not exclusive - exclusive would mean them and them alone can pick the players. For someone who is a pendent for literal meanings of the word you sure got yourself in a hole here. Where you can show me exclusive - then I will stand corrected. Not first dibs - not priority - EXCLUSIVE.

You can't say on one hand Storm don't have exclusive - when it comes to their feeder club and the Suns do - surely you have a file on the whole Academy system of the AFL - articles, press releases - please comb through them and tell us where it says exclusive - if so fine - you are right - but if it says priority,...... hmmmmm

Re: GWS / SUNS >> How much more dollars

Posted: Mon Oct 21, 2019 12:02 pm
by Fred
https://www.afl.com.au/news/2019-02-16/ ... ming-footy

This may explain it but it is extremely complicated. ... again, people who are in a clubs academy can go to other clubs - the club gets priority however and there is a whole points thing as well. Very confusing but doesn't seem to me to be exclusive.

Re: GWS / SUNS >> How much more dollars

Posted: Sat Oct 26, 2019 3:14 am
by notaleaguefan
Looks like the usual tin foil hat brigad leagienfans have left the argument when they cannot think of any but buts

Re: GWS / SUNS >> How much more dollars

Posted: Sat Oct 26, 2019 6:38 am
by AFLcrap1
Sigh
No one left
You asked me a question .
I answered Now I'm waiting for your reply to my post
So how the fuck do you come up with we left .
Jesus you live in an alternate universe
I've no idea how you get that out of my post

Re: GWS / SUNS >> How much more dollars

Posted: Sat Oct 26, 2019 10:25 am
by Fred
I’m still wondering where AFLcrap got “exclusive” from in regard to Northern Territory picks ? The best he has come up with is “first dibs” which he means priority as I pointed out ... which is not exclusive. For someone who is a pendant for literal meanings of words i would have thought he would be more careful in his choice of words. Or does he standards only apply to others and not himself ??

Re: GWS / SUNS >> How much more dollars

Posted: Wed Jan 15, 2020 8:04 pm
by leeroy*NRL*
The AFL hasn't seen a list this big': Why size matters for the Suns

THE ASSISTANCE package gifted to Gold Coast by the AFL Commission in late September has already proved to be a home run of help for the Suns.

currently Gold Coast has 51 players on its books, plus international scholarship holder Hewago Paul Oea (better known as "Ace") who is permitted to play in the NEAFL in 2020.

Hard-nut midfielder Anthony Miles put it simply: "The AFL hasn't seen a list this big".

https://www.afl.com.au/news/364942/-the ... r-the-suns

Re: GWS / SUNS >> How much more dollars

Posted: Wed Jan 15, 2020 11:58 pm
by AFLcrap1
Lol

Re: GWS / SUNS >> How much more dollars

Posted: Thu Jan 16, 2020 5:47 pm
by Fred
Still wondering where this "exclusive" stuff AFLcrapper was banging on about - as usual wrong again.

Re: GWS / SUNS >> How much more dollars

Posted: Fri Jan 17, 2020 10:25 pm
by Beaussie
Fred wrote: Sat Oct 26, 2019 10:25 am
I’m still wondering where AFLcrap got “exclusive” from in regard to Northern Territory picks ? The best he has come up with is “first dibs” which he means priority as I pointed out ... which is not exclusive. For someone who is a pendant for literal meanings of words i would have thought he would be more careful in his choice of words. Or does he standards only apply to others and not himself ??
Yep, but we already knew that right. Of course he won’t acknowledge this double standard. Never has. :mrgreen:

Re: GWS / SUNS >> How much more dollars

Posted: Fri Jan 17, 2020 11:38 pm
by AFLcrap1
Beaussie wrote: Fri Jan 17, 2020 10:25 pm
Fred wrote: Sat Oct 26, 2019 10:25 am
I’m still wondering where AFLcrap got “exclusive” from in regard to Northern Territory picks ? The best he has come up with is “first dibs” which he means priority as I pointed out ... which is not exclusive. For someone who is a pendant for literal meanings of words i would have thought he would be more careful in his choice of words. Or does he standards only apply to others and not himself ??
Yep, but we already knew that right. Of course he won’t acknowledge this double standard. Never has. :mrgreen:
lol
graso at those straws Bea
They have first pick
No other club has that .
So yep that's exclusive .
If you're the only one then you're exclusive .
If that's not exclusive then you need to look up the meaning
.

Re: GWS / SUNS >> How much more dollars

Posted: Sat Jan 18, 2020 3:45 am
by Fred
No it’s not exclusive you idiot. If something is shown on channel 9 as an exclusive it means it not on any other channel .... not that they had first pick !!!!


Look up the word exclusive....


God knows we’ve put up with you trolling people and topics over literal meanings for years clogging up thread after thread .... banging on and refusing to answer a persons question until they can show where a literal meaning or word was used ...

Here’s a tip ... just say whooops I meant first not exclusive.

Re: GWS / SUNS >> How much more dollars

Posted: Sat Jan 18, 2020 3:48 am
by Fred
C1
limited to only one person or group of people:
This room is for the exclusive use of guests.
an exclusive interview

Re: GWS / SUNS >> How much more dollars

Posted: Sat Jan 25, 2020 2:43 pm
by Nah
Interesting fact.
Ever since it's inception the GWS has averaged higher attendances than any NRL club.

That's since inception everybody!!!!!!!

Re: GWS / SUNS >> How much more dollars

Posted: Sat Jan 25, 2020 3:18 pm
by AFLcrap1
Nah wrote: Sat Jan 25, 2020 2:43 pm
Interesting fact.
Ever since it's inception the GWS has averaged higher attendances than any NRL club.

That's since inception everybody!!!!!!!
Oh dear god
Someone help,him .
He's reached links level of bullshit

Re: GWS / SUNS >> How much more dollars

Posted: Sat Jan 25, 2020 3:23 pm
by Fred
Well f he is wrong show where / how ? This is a constant from you ... you make meaningless comments without actually addressing the points made in the post.